Literature DB >> 26372761

Midterm Follow-Up of Metal-Backed Glenoid Components in Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Thomas Obermeyer, Paul J Cagle1, Bradford O Parsons, Evan L Flatow.   

Abstract

Loosening of the glenoid remains one of the most common complications of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and is the most cited reason for performing revision arthroplasty. Ingrowth metal-backed glenoid components offer the theoretical advantage of bone growth directly into the prosthesis with a single host-prosthesis interface. In the study reported here, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had TSAs performed by 2 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons using glenoid components with porous tantalum anchors. Standard radiographs were analyzed for lucency surrounding the anchors. Before and after surgery, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and active forward elevation (AFE) and active external rotation (AER) measurements were recorded. Twelve shoulders (11 patients) were examined. Mean follow-up was 20 months. In all cases, radiographs showed no glenoid lucency. Mean AFE and mean AER both increased significantly (P < .01), as did postoperative ASES scores (P < .01). Porous tantalum ingrowth glenoid components show no radiographic or clinical evidence of loosening at midterm follow-up. Long-term studies are needed to determine if these midterm outcomes are maintained and provide benefit over conventional cemented polyethylene designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26372761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  4 in total

Review 1.  Do Modern Designs of Metal-Backed Glenoid Components Show Improved Clinical Results in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Fahad Alabdullatif; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Myung Jin Shin; Hyojune Kim; Dongjun Park; Erica Kholinne; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-28

2.  Articular surface failure in hybrid anatomic glenoid components: a unique failure mechanism.

Authors:  Joseph G Monir; William K Powers; Joseph J King; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 3.  Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Lazaros Kostretzis; Angelos Trellopoulos; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-09-25

4.  Loosening and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid and three modern designs of metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  Dong Min Kim; Mohammed Aldeghaither; Fahad Alabdullatif; Myung Jin Shin; Erica Kholinne; Hyojune Kim; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung-Hwan Koh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.