| Literature DB >> 26372655 |
Maria Virgínia Alves Martins1, Noureddine Zaaboub2, Lotfi Aleya3, Fabrizio Frontalini4, Egberto Pereira5, Paulo Miranda6, Miguel Mane5, Fernando Rocha6, Lazaro Laut7, Monia El Bour2.
Abstract
This study investigated the environmental quality of the Bizerte Lagoon (Tunisia) through an integrated approach thatEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26372655 PMCID: PMC4570719 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1a) Study area in the Bizerte Lagoon (adapted from OTC, 1992, Map of Bizerte Lagoon office de la topographie et de la cartographie de Tunisie). The studied stations are labeled with numbers. The main towns and streams are indicated. b) Photo of the surface water column showing the cnidarian bloom. c) Photo showing suspended structures used in mollusks culture.
Fig 2Distribution maps of: a) pH; b) redox potential (Eh) (mV); c) dissolved oxygen (DO) content in surface sediments (mg/l); d) sediment mean grain size (SMGS; μm); e) phyllosilicates (%); f) ferrous berthierine (f.; %); g) kaolinite (%); h) magnetic susceptibility (SI unities).
Selected sedimentological data.
| Stations | SMGS | CaCO3 | TOC | TN | C/N | Chl | δ13C | AVS | SEM/AVS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LB-1 | 20 | 21 | 5.93 | 1.25 | 4.74 | 196.7 | -1.78 | 212.23 | 0.52 |
| LB-2 | 23.3 | 16 | 4.02 | 0.92 | 4.37 | 91.4 | -1.17 | 617.28 | 0.16 |
| LB-4 | 9.3 | 28 | 5.87 | 1.26 | 4.66 | 127.4 | -2.32 | 242.33 | 0.37 |
| LB-5 | 6.6 | 23 | 4.87 | 0.78 | 6.24 | 699 | -2.21 | 181.32 | 0.54 |
| LB-6 | 7.8 | 20 | 3.93 | 0.57 | 6.89 | 155.1 | -2.4 | 65.96 | 2.6 |
| LB-7 | 18.1 | 18 | 3.57 | 0.78 | 4.58 | 92.3 | -1.64 | 0.0 | |
| LB-8 | 6.6 | 12 | 2.54 | 0.88 | 2.89 | 244.7 | -1.51 | 212.4 | 0.42 |
| LB-9 | 7.9 | 18 | 3.29 | 2.25 | 1.46 | 69.3 | -2.52 | 35.56 | 3.56 |
| LB-10 | 7.7 | 21 | 4.02 | 1.09 | 3.69 | 241.9 | -1.77 | 193.67 | 0.59 |
| LB-11 | 9.7 | 19 | 3.77 | 1.05 | 3.59 | 122.8 | -2.36 | 695.19 | 0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMGS–sediment mean grain size (μm); CaCO3 (%); TOC (%), TN—total nitrogen (%); C/N ratio; Chlorophyll a (Chl a; mg/m3); δ13C (‰; VPDB); AVS (μg g-1); SEM/AVS ratio.
Fig 3Distribution maps of: a) total organic carbon (TOC; %); b) calcium carbonate content (CaCO3; %); c) acid volatile sulfides concentrations (AVS; μg/g); d) simultaneous extracted metals and AVS ratio (SEM/AVS).
Fig 4Distribution maps of: a) Cha—Chlorophyll a (Cha; mg/m3) and; b) δ13C (‰) values.
Selected biotic data.
| Stations | S | J | H' | FD | TC | FE | TMC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LB-1 | 17 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 557 | 4 | 240 | 3400 |
| LB-2 | 46 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 11096 | <3 | <3 | 1700 |
| LB-4 | 35 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 2326 | 7 | 90 | 800 |
| LB-5 | 28 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 3079 | 40 | 3 | 9200 |
| LB-6 | 37 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 4113 | 14 | 150 | 1600 |
| LB-7 | 39 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 5576 | 14 | 1100 | 4900 |
| LB-8 | 33 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 3830 | 15 | 3 | 1100 |
| LB-9 | 36 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 4299 | 15 | 21 | 1100 |
| LB-10 | 38 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 14862 | 4 | 23 | 3000 |
| LB-11 | 36 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 7132 | 9 | 20 | 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S—species richness; J–equitability; H’—Shannon Index; FD—foraminifera density (n° g-1); TC—Total Coliforms; FE—Faecal Enterococci (NPP/100mg) and; TMC—Total Mesophyllic Counts (CFU g-1).
Fig 5Distribution maps of bacterial counts: a) total coliforms (TC; net primary production per 100 mg or NPP/100 mg); b) fecal enterococci (FE; NPP/100 mg), and c) total mesophilic counts (TMC; colony-forming units per gram—cfu/g).
Fig 6Distribution maps of: a) FD: foraminiferal density (n°/g); b) H’: Shannon Index; c) Ammonia parkinsoniana (%); d) Hopkinsina atlantica (%); e) Bolivina striatula (%); and; f) Bolivina ordinaria (%).
Fig 7Principal components analysis based on the main benthic foraminifera species/taxa and: a) sedimentological data (grain size, mineralogical, geochemical and geophysical data); b) quantity and quality of organic matter and bacteria.
Legend: Sand–sand fraction (>63μm); Mud–fine fraction (<63μm); clay–clay fraction (<2μm); total organic carbon–TOC; Chl–chlorite; Kaol–kaolinite; Berth–berthierine; Phyl–phyllosilicates; MS–magnetic susceptibility; AVS–acid volatile sulfides; SEM/AVS–simultaneous extracted metals and AVS ratio; FE—fecal enterococci; TC–total coliforms; TMC–total mesophilic counts; TBP—total of biopolymers; LIP–lipids; PTN–proteins; CHO–carbohydrates; Chla–Chlorophyll a; FD–foraminiferal density (n°/g); b) SI–Shannon Index; S–species richness; J–equitability.
Fig 8Results of Q-mode cluster analysis.