Literature DB >> 26372357

Pregnancy outcomes in women with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Doris Prisca Yimgang1, Jay Robert Shapiro1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) type, mode of delivery and outcomes as self-reported by women in the International Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) Registry.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study using data from 274 women with OI who reported their experience with pregnancy practices, including mode of delivery, number of children, genetic counseling, assisted conception techniques, mean ages at menarche and at menopause, and pregnancy complications. Chi-square analyses were performed to compare pregnancy outcomes, number of children and OI type. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained to quantify exposure-outcome relationships.
RESULTS: The most common mode of delivery was the sole use of cesarean section (C-section) reported by 55% of the participants. Approximately two-thirds had at least two children. Twenty-nine percent (n = 80) reported pregnancy complications. There was a significant relationship between the mode of delivery and OI type (p < 0.001), genetic counseling (p = 0.010), and number of children (p < 0.0001). There was neither evidence of an association between pregnancy complications and number of children (p = 0.16), OI type (p = 0.27), nor mode of delivery (p = 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that clinical OI type, pre-natal genetic counseling, and number of children were strong predictors for choosing the mode of delivery. Severity of OI, multiparity, and vaginal delivery were not associated with increased pregnancy complications in this cohort of women with OI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mode of delivery; OI registry; OI type; pregnancy complications; prenatal genetic counseling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26372357     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1085965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  6 in total

Review 1.  Osteogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents-new developments in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  P Trejo; F Rauch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Experiences of Women of Short Stature During the Perinatal Period.

Authors:  Serah Nthenge; Lauren Smith; Sandy Ho; Monika Mitra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2022-05-09

3.  Pregnancy outcomes in women with osteogenesis imperfecta: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Ruiter-Ligeti; N Czuzoj-Shulman; A R Spence; T Tulandi; H A Abenhaim
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Pregnancy in women with osteogenesis imperfecta: pregnancy characteristics, maternal, and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Rashmi Rao; David Cuthbertson; Sandesh C S Nagamani; Vernon Reid Sutton; Brendan H Lee; Jeffrey Krischer; Deborah Krakow
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-03-26

5.  Assessing disease experience across the life span for individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: challenges and opportunities for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measurement: a pilot study.

Authors:  Laura L Tosi; Marianne K Floor; Christina M Dollar; Austin P Gillies; Tracy S Hart; David D Cuthbertson; V Reid Sutton; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  Osteogenesis Imperfecta: characterization of fractures during pregnancy and post-partum.

Authors:  Eugénie Koumakis; Valérie Cormier-Daire; Azeddine Dellal; Marc Debernardi; Bernard Cortet; Françoise Debiais; Rose-Marie Javier; Thierry Thomas; Nadia Mehsen-Cetre; Martine Cohen-Solal; Elisabeth Fontanges; Michel Laroche; Valérie Porquet-Bordes; Christian Marcelli; Alexandra Benachi; Karine Briot; Christian Roux; Catherine Cormier
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.123

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.