Supansa Srichumchit1, Suchaya Luewan2, Theera Tongsong1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Electronic address: suleuwan@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes between women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and those with low-risk pregnancies during implementation of the GDM practice guideline. METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were compared between women with singleton pregnancies complicated by GDM and control women with singleton low-risk pregnancies who delivered at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand, between January 2002 and December 2012. All pregnant women were screened and managed for GDM as recommended by the National Diabetes Data Group. RESULTS: During the study period, 1350 pregnancies with GDM and 20421 low-risk pregnancies met the study criteria and were included in the GDM group and the control group, respectively. The incidence of fetal macrosomia-the main outcome-was significantly higher in the GDM group (n=270, 20.0%) than in the control group (n=2776, 3.6%; adjusted odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.71; P<0.001). The incidences of cesarean delivery, cephalopelvic disproportion, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and shoulder dystocia were also significantly higher in the GDM group (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite the practice guideline, adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal macrosomia, cesarean delivery, and pregnancy-induced hypertension, were significantly higher among women with GDM. The findings warrant an effective audit system or improved adherence to the guideline.
OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes between women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and those with low-risk pregnancies during implementation of the GDM practice guideline. METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were compared between women with singleton pregnancies complicated by GDM and control women with singleton low-risk pregnancies who delivered at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand, between January 2002 and December 2012. All pregnant women were screened and managed for GDM as recommended by the National Diabetes Data Group. RESULTS: During the study period, 1350 pregnancies with GDM and 20421 low-risk pregnancies met the study criteria and were included in the GDM group and the control group, respectively. The incidence of fetal macrosomia-the main outcome-was significantly higher in the GDM group (n=270, 20.0%) than in the control group (n=2776, 3.6%; adjusted odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.71; P<0.001). The incidences of cesarean delivery, cephalopelvic disproportion, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and shoulder dystocia were also significantly higher in the GDM group (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite the practice guideline, adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal macrosomia, cesarean delivery, and pregnancy-induced hypertension, were significantly higher among women with GDM. The findings warrant an effective audit system or improved adherence to the guideline.
Authors: Angela P H Burgess; Justin Katz; Joanna Pessolano; Jane Ponterio; Michael Moretti; Nisha A Lakhi Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Lisette T Jacobson; Tracie C Collins; Meredith Lucas; Rosey Zackula; Hayrettin Okut; Niaman Nazir; David Robbins; Judy E Stern; Michael Wolfe; David A Grainger Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2020-04-08
Authors: Zhi Guo Chen; Ya Ting Xu; Lu Lu Ji; Xiao Li Zhang; Xiao Xing Chen; Rui Liu; Chao Wu; Yan Ling Wang; Han Yang Hu; Lin Wang Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.007