OBJECTIVE: The benefits of HAART rely on continuous lifelong treatment retention. We used linked population-level health administrative data to characterize durations of HAART retention and nonretention. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We considered individuals initiating HAART in British Columbia (1996-2012). An HAART episode was considered discontinued if individuals had a gap of at least 30 days between days in which medication was prescribed. We considered durations of HAART retention and nonretention separately, and used Cox proportional hazards frailty models to identify demographic and treatment-related factors associated with durations of HAART retention and nonretention. RESULTS: Six thousand one hundred fifty-two individuals were included in the analysis; 81.2% were male, 40.6% were people who inject drugs, and 42.8% initiated treatment with CD4 cell count less than 200 cells/μl. Overall, 29% were continuously retained on HAART through the end of follow-up. HAART episodes were a median 6.8 months (25th, 75th percentile: 2.3, 19.5), whereas off-HAART episodes lasted a median 1.9 months (1.2, 4.5). In Cox proportional hazards frailty models, durations of HAART retention improved over time. Successive treatment episodes tended to decrease in duration among those with multiple attempts, whereas off-HAART episodes remained relatively stable. Younger age, earlier stages of disease progression, and injection drug use were all associated with shorter durations of HAART retention and longer off-HAART durations. CONCLUSION: Metrics to monitor HAART retention, dropout, and reentry should be prioritized for HIV surveillance. Clinical strategies and public health policies are urgently needed to improve HAART retention, particularly among those at earlier stages of disease progression, the young, and people who inject drugs.
OBJECTIVE: The benefits of HAART rely on continuous lifelong treatment retention. We used linked population-level health administrative data to characterize durations of HAART retention and nonretention. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We considered individuals initiating HAART in British Columbia (1996-2012). An HAART episode was considered discontinued if individuals had a gap of at least 30 days between days in which medication was prescribed. We considered durations of HAART retention and nonretention separately, and used Cox proportional hazards frailty models to identify demographic and treatment-related factors associated with durations of HAART retention and nonretention. RESULTS: Six thousand one hundred fifty-two individuals were included in the analysis; 81.2% were male, 40.6% were people who inject drugs, and 42.8% initiated treatment with CD4 cell count less than 200 cells/μl. Overall, 29% were continuously retained on HAART through the end of follow-up. HAART episodes were a median 6.8 months (25th, 75th percentile: 2.3, 19.5), whereas off-HAART episodes lasted a median 1.9 months (1.2, 4.5). In Cox proportional hazards frailty models, durations of HAART retention improved over time. Successive treatment episodes tended to decrease in duration among those with multiple attempts, whereas off-HAART episodes remained relatively stable. Younger age, earlier stages of disease progression, and injection drug use were all associated with shorter durations of HAART retention and longer off-HAART durations. CONCLUSION: Metrics to monitor HAART retention, dropout, and reentry should be prioritized for HIV surveillance. Clinical strategies and public health policies are urgently needed to improve HAART retention, particularly among those at earlier stages of disease progression, the young, and people who inject drugs.
Authors: Edward M Gardner; Margaret P McLees; John F Steiner; Carlos Del Rio; William J Burman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Becky L Genberg; Ira B Wilson; David R Bangsberg; Julia Arnsten; Kathy Goggin; Robert H Remien; Jane Simoni; Robert Gross; Nancy Reynolds; Marc Rosen; Honghu Liu Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Peter Rebeiro; Keri N Althoff; Kate Buchacz; John Gill; Michael Horberg; Hartmut Krentz; Richard Moore; Timothy R Sterling; John T Brooks; Kelly A Gebo; Robert Hogg; Marina Klein; Jeffrey Martin; Michael Mugavero; Sean Rourke; Michael J Silverberg; Jennifer Thorne; Stephen J Gange Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Bohdan Nosyk; M Douglas Anglin; Suzanne Brissette; Thomas Kerr; David C Marsh; Bruce R Schackman; Evan Wood; Julio S G Montaner Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jonathan Colasanti; Natalie Stahl; Eugene W Farber; Carlos Del Rio; Wendy S Armstrong Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Hannah Fraser; Christinah Mukandavire; Natasha K Martin; Matthew Hickman; Myron S Cohen; William C Miller; Peter Vickerman Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Hana Lee; Joseph W Hogan; Becky L Genberg; Xiaotian K Wu; Beverly S Musick; Ann Mwangi; Paula Braitstein Journal: Stat Med Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Bohdan Nosyk; Xiao Zang; Jeong E Min; Emanuel Krebs; Viviane D Lima; M-J Milloy; Jean Shoveller; Rolando Barrios; P Richard Harrigan; Thomas Kerr; Evan Wood; Julio S G Montaner Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Merhawi T Gebrezgi; Kristopher P Fennie; Diana M Sheehan; Boubakari Ibrahimou; Sandra G Jones; Petra Brock; Robert A Ladner; Mary Jo Trepka Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2020-02-09 Impact factor: 1.359