Literature DB >> 26372230

Course of recovery for whiplash associated disorders in a compensation setting.

Petrina P Casey1, Anne Marie Feyer2, Ian D Cameron3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The detailed course of recovery following compensable whiplash associated disorders (WAD) is not well understood. Some people recover within months and others report symptoms for extended periods. Recent research identified distinct recovery pathways. Identifying recovery pathways for people with this condition in compensable settings could assist clinical and claim management. STUDY
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify recovery trajectories based on disability, pain catastrophising and mental health and, secondly, to examine developmental linkages between the trajectories. STUDY
DESIGN: A cohort of 246 people with compensable WAD were followed for 24 months after a motor vehicle related injury. OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional Rating Index (FRI), Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS) and the SF36 Mental Component Score (SF 36 MCS).
METHOD: Group-based trajectory analytical techniques were used to identify distinct post-injury profiles. Multinominal logistic regression modelling identified factors associated with membership of different trajectories.
RESULTS: 246 people were enrolled a median of 72 days after injury. Three trajectories were identified for the measures used and their prevalences, respectively, were: for disability (FRI) they were mild (47%), moderate (31%), and severe (22%); for pain catastrophising (PCS) they were non-catastrophisers (55%), moderate-low catastrophisers (32%) and clinically significant catastrophisers (13%); and, for mental health (SF36 MCS) they were good mental health (40%), moderately low mental health (42%) and severely low mental health (18%). All groups showed no further recovery beyond 12 months after injury. The significant baseline predictors of the severe disability trajectory were: lower (that means worse) bodily pain scores (SF 36 BPS) (p≤0.01); high pain catastrophising (p≤0.01); and, self-reported fair or poor general health (p=0.03). Conditional probabilities for group membership showed that the three trajectories for both PCS and FRI were linked. Dual membership was high for the mild disability and mild pain catastrophising trajectories and, for the severe disability and clinically significant pain catastrophising trajectories.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong and plausible association between severe disability, clinical levels of pain catastrophising and low mental health. Claimants can be identified at claim notification based on three estimated recovery trajectories. Claim and clinical interventions can be targeted to the profile within each recovery trajectory.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Claimants; Compensation; Developmental trajectories; Disability; Mental health; Pain catastrophising; Recovery; WAD; Whiplash

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26372230     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

1.  An analysis of whiplash injury outcomes in an Irish population: a retrospective fifteen-year study of a spine surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Eva McCabe; Mutaz Jadaan; Dima Jadaan; John P McCabe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  The nosological classification of whiplash-associated disorder: a narrative review.

Authors:  Joe H Ghorayeb
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2021-04

3.  Evaluation and Treatment of Trigeminal Symptoms of Cervical Origin After a Motor-Vehicle Crash: A Case Report With 9-Month Follow-up.

Authors:  Jason P Moses; Steve Karas
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Do expectations of recovery improve risk assessment for people with whiplash-associated disorders? Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alexandra R Griffin; Michele Sterling; Carrie Ritchie; Annette Kifley; Jagnoor Jagnoor; Ian D Cameron; Trudy Rebbeck
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Stella Samoborec; Rasa Ruseckaite; Lorena Romero; Sue M Evans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Exploring patients' experiences of the whiplash injury-recovery process - a meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Anne Söderlund; Lena Nordgren; Michele Sterling; Britt-Marie Stålnacke
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Prognostic Role of Demographic, Injury and Claim Factors in Disabling Pain and Mental Health Conditions 12 Months after Compensable Injury.

Authors:  Thi L Nguyen; Katharine S Baker; Liane Ioannou; Behrooz Hassani-Mahmooei; Stephen J Gibson; Alex Collie; Jennie Ponsford; Peter A Cameron; Belinda J Gabbe; Melita J Giummarra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Psychological risk factors that characterize the trajectories of quality of life after a physical trauma: a longitudinal study using latent class analysis.

Authors:  Eva Visser; Brenda Leontine Den Oudsten; Taco Gosens; Paul Lodder; Jolanda De Vries
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Pregabalin versus placebo in targeting pro-nociceptive mechanisms to prevent chronic pain after whiplash injury in at-risk individuals - a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J Nikles; G Keijzers; G Mitchell; S Schug; R Ware; S A McLean; L Connelly; S Gibson; S F Farrell; M Sterling
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.