Literature DB >> 26372055

Learning to selectively attend from context-specific attentional histories: A demonstration and some constraints.

Matthew J C Crump1.   

Abstract

Multiple lines of evidence from the attention and performance literature show that attention filtering can be controlled by higher level voluntary processes and lower-level cue-driven processes (for recent reviews see Bugg, 2012; Bugg & Crump, 2012; Egner, 2008). The experiments were designed to test a general hypothesis that cue-driven control learns from context-specific histories of prior acts of selective attention. Several web-based flanker studies were conducted via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Attention filtering demands were induced by a secondary one-back memory task after each trial prompting recall of the last target or distractor letter. Blocking recall demands produced larger flanker effects for the distractor than target recall conditions. Mixing recall demands and associating them with particular stimulus-cues (location, colour, letter, and font) sometimes showed rapid, contextual control of flanker interference, and sometimes did not. The results show that subtle methodological parameters can influence whether or not contextual control is observed. More generally, the results show that contextual control phenomena can be influenced by other sources of control, including other cue-driven sources competing for control. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26372055     DOI: 10.1037/cep0000066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  4 in total

1.  What is cued by faces in the face-based context-specific proportion congruent manipulation?

Authors:  Thomas Hutcheon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.140

Review 3.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to context-control learning.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Binding Error-Induced Control States.

Authors:  Anna Foerster; Moritz Schiltenwolf; David Dignath; Roland Pfister
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-04-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.