Literature DB >> 26372037

The role of MRI in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer.

Pedro Recabal1, Behfar Ehdaie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Active surveillance is the preferred management strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer. Challenges in this field include improving patient selection, optimizing follow-up strategies, and identifying appropriate triggers for intervention. Advances in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have lead to improved detection of prostate tumors, and MRI has emerged as a tool to monitor men on active surveillance. We aim to review the latest developments in mpMRI to monitor active surveillance patients and describe areas of future research. RECENT
FINDINGS: mpMRI targeted prostate biopsy results in a higher detection rate of significant prostate cancer, and a lower probability of detecting insignificant tumors, compared to systematic biopsy. mpMRI-targeted biopsies have improved diagnosis of significant anterior tumors. A small proportion of high-grade tumors is missed by mpMRI and targeted biopsy. However, the majority of these tumors are small-volume, Gleason grade 3 + 4 cancers, and their clinical significance is unknown.
SUMMARY: mpMRI and targeted prostate biopsy have emerged as tools to improve the accuracy of systematic biopsy to select patients for active surveillance. The role of mpMRI to monitor and trigger intervention in these patients is understudied, and integration of MRI data with clinical characteristics can help many men avoid routine confirmatory biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26372037     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  4 in total

1.  Ruling out clinically significant prostate cancer with negative multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  Julie Y An; Abhinav Sidana; Sarah A Holzman; Joseph A Baiocco; Sherif Mehralivand; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Diagnostic Value of Guided Biopsies: Fusion and Cognitive-registration Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Conventional Ultrasound Biopsy of the Prostate.

Authors:  Daniel T Oberlin; David D Casalino; Frank H Miller; Richard S Matulewicz; Kent T Perry; Robert B Nadler; Shilajit Kundu; William J Catalona; Joshua J Meeks
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  The performance of PI-RADSv2 and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting confirmatory prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Nicola Robertson; Jennifer Golia Pernicka; Nicolas Molinari; Andreas M Hötker; Behfar Ehdaie; Evis Sala; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-07

4.  Radiomic features on MRI enable risk categorization of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Ahmad Algohary; Satish Viswanath; Rakesh Shiradkar; Soumya Ghose; Shivani Pahwa; Daniel Moses; Ivan Jambor; Ronald Shnier; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Andrei S Purysko; Sadhna Verma; Lee Ponsky; Phillip Stricker; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.813

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.