Literature DB >> 26371828

Sensory reweighting is altered in adolescent patients with scoliosis: Evidence from a neuromechanical model.

Jean-Philippe Pialasse1, Martin Descarreaux2, Pierre Mercier3, Martin Simoneau4.   

Abstract

Idiopathic scoliosis is the most frequent spinal deformity in adolescence. While its aetiology remains unclear, impairments in balance control suggest a dysfunction of the sensorimotor control mechanisms. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the ability of patients with idiopathic scoliosis to reweigh sensory information. Using a neuromechanical model, the relative sensory weighting of vestibular and proprioceptive information was assessed. Sixteen healthy adolescents and respectively 20 and 16 adolescents with mild or severe scoliosis were recruited. Binaural bipolar galvanic vestibular stimulation was delivered to elicit postural movement along the coronal plane. The kinematics of the upper body, using normalized horizontal displacement of the 7th cervical vertebra, was recorded 1s before, 2s during, and 1s following vestibular stimulation. The neuromechanical model included active feedback mechanisms that generated corrective torque from the vestibular and proprioceptive error signals. The model successfully predicted the normalized horizontal displacement of the 7th cervical vertebra. All groups showed similar balance control before vestibular stimulation; however, the amplitude (i.e., peak horizontal displacement) of the body sway during and immediately following vestibular stimulation was approximately 3 times larger in patients compared to control adolescents. The outcome of the model revealed that patients assigned a larger weight to vestibular information compared to controls; vestibular weight was 6.03% for controls, whereas it was 13.09% and 13.26% for the mild and severe scoliosis groups, respectively. These results suggest that despite the amplitude of spine deformation, the sensory reweighting mechanism is altered similarly in adolescent patients with scoliosis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Balance control; Galvanic vestibular stimulation; Mathematical modelling; Sensorimotor integration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26371828     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  6 in total

1.  Segmental trunk and head dynamics during frontal plane tilt stimuli in healthy sitting adults.

Authors:  Yen-Hsun Wu; Kerian Duncan; Sandra Saavedra; Adam Goodworth
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Clinical balance tests, proprioceptive system and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Morgane Le Berre; Marc-Alexandre Guyot; Olivier Agnani; Isabelle Bourdeauducq; Marie-Christine Versyp; Cécile Donze; André Thévenon; Jean-Francois Catanzariti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of Trunk Motion between Moderate AIS and Healthy Children.

Authors:  Lucas Struber; Vincent Nougier; Jacques Griffet; Olivier Daniel; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Philippe Cinquin; Aurélien Courvoisier
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Verticality perception reveals a vestibular deficit in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Nikoleta Antoniadou; Vassilia Hatzitaki; Stavros Ι Stavridis; Eythimios Samoladas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Comparison of segmental spinal movement control in adolescents with and without idiopathic scoliosis using modified pressure biofeedback unit.

Authors:  Hong-Ji Luo; Shi-Xiang Lin; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Mei-Wun Tsai; Shwn-Jen Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Postural control through force plate measurements in female AIS patients compared to their able-bodied peers.

Authors:  Elżbieta Piątek-Krzywicka; Dorota Borzucka; Michał Kuczyński
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.