OBJECTIVES: Long bone fractures that fail to heal or show a delay in healing can lead to increased morbidity. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) containing bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) has been suggested as an autologous biologic adjunct to aid long bone healing. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the basic science in vivo evidence for the use of BMAC with BMSCs in the treatment of segmental defects in animal long bones. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were screened in July 14-25, 2014. STUDY SELECTION: The following search criteria were used: [("bmac" OR "bone marrow aspirate concentrate" OR "bmc" OR "bone marrow concentrate" OR "mesenchymal stem cells") AND ("bone" OR "osteogenesis" OR "fracture healing" OR "nonunion" OR "delayed union")]. DATA EXTRACTION: Three authors extracted data and analyzed for trends. Quality of evidence score was given to each study. DATA SYNTHESIS: Results are presented as Hedge G standardized effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The search yielded 35 articles for inclusion. Of studies reporting statistics, 100% showed significant increase in bone formation in the BMAC group on radiograph. Ninety percent reported significant improvement in earlier bone healing on histologic/histomorphometric assessment. Eighty-one percent reported a significant increase in bone area on micro-computed tomography. Seventy-eight percent showed a higher torsional stiffness for the BMAC-treated defects. CONCLUSION: In the in vivo studies evaluated, BMAC confer beneficial effects on the healing of segmental defects in animal long bone models when compared with a control. Proof-of-concept has been established for BMAC in the treatment of animal segmental bone defects.
OBJECTIVES: Long bone fractures that fail to heal or show a delay in healing can lead to increased morbidity. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) containing bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) has been suggested as an autologous biologic adjunct to aid long bone healing. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the basic science in vivo evidence for the use of BMAC with BMSCs in the treatment of segmental defects in animal long bones. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were screened in July 14-25, 2014. STUDY SELECTION: The following search criteria were used: [("bmac" OR "bone marrow aspirate concentrate" OR "bmc" OR "bone marrow concentrate" OR "mesenchymal stem cells") AND ("bone" OR "osteogenesis" OR "fracture healing" OR "nonunion" OR "delayed union")]. DATA EXTRACTION: Three authors extracted data and analyzed for trends. Quality of evidence score was given to each study. DATA SYNTHESIS: Results are presented as Hedge G standardized effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The search yielded 35 articles for inclusion. Of studies reporting statistics, 100% showed significant increase in bone formation in the BMAC group on radiograph. Ninety percent reported significant improvement in earlier bone healing on histologic/histomorphometric assessment. Eighty-one percent reported a significant increase in bone area on micro-computed tomography. Seventy-eight percent showed a higher torsional stiffness for the BMAC-treated defects. CONCLUSION: In the in vivo studies evaluated, BMAC confer beneficial effects on the healing of segmental defects in animal long bone models when compared with a control. Proof-of-concept has been established for BMAC in the treatment of animal segmental bone defects.
Authors: Bach Quang Le; Victor Nurcombe; Simon McKenzie Cool; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Jan de Boer; Vanessa Lydia Simone LaPointe Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Richard Schäfer; Malcolm R DeBaun; Erika Fleck; Christopher J Centeno; Daniela Kraft; Johannes Leibacher; Karen Bieback; Erhard Seifried; Jason L Dragoo Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 5.531