Literature DB >> 26371410

Risk factors of infected sternal wounds versus sterile wound dehiscence.

Rose H Fu1, Andrew L Weinstein1, Michelle M Chang1, Michael Argenziano2, Jeffrey A Ascherman1, Christine H Rohde3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sterile sternal dehiscence (SSD) and sternal wound infections (SWIs) are two complications of median sternotomy with high rates of morbidity. Sternal wound complications also carry significant economic burden, almost tripling patients' hospital costs and are considered a nonreimbursable "never event" for Medicare. Historically, SDD and SWI have been recognized as discrete entities, but nonetheless continue to be categorized as a singular complication in literature. The purpose of this study was to determine specific patient demographic and perioperative predictors of SSD and SWI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective study of 8098 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery at Columbia University Medical Center between January 2008 and December 2013 was conducted. Patients were categorized into three groups: no sternal wound complication, SSD, or SWI. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of 8098 patients, there were 73 patients (0.9%) with SSD and 40 (0.5%) with SWI who required plastic surgical consultation, debridement, and flap closure. In univariate analysis of SSD, positive predictors (i.e., "risk" factors) were age >42 years, prior surgery this admission, ≥2 arterial conduits, internal mammary artery (IMA) grafting with or without previous IMA grafting, body mass index (BMI) >30 (obese), CHF, diabetes requiring medication, respiratory failure, and unplanned cardiac reoperation; negative predictors (i.e., "protective" factors) were no arterial conduits and extubation within 24 h. In univariate analysis of SWI, positive predictors were IMA grafting with or without previous IMA grafting, postoperative hematocrit urgent/emergent surgical priority, BMI >30 (obese), cardiac ejection fraction <40%, and respiratory failure; negative predictors were no arterial conduits and elective surgical priority. In multivariate regression, BMI >30, diabetes requiring medication, and respiratory failure were determined to be significant positive predictors of SSD, and IMA grafting with or without prior IMA grafting and respiratory failure were significant positive predictors for SWI; no significant negative predictors were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that SSD and SWI have many common significant predictors consistent with findings that increased BMI, use of IMA grafts, poor cardiac reserve, and postoperative respiratory failure confer increased risk of sternal wound complications. Additionally, this study also found that there were predictors unique to each entity supporting that SSD and SWI may be related but are not a singular entity. Recognition and prevention of significant positive and negative predictors of SSD and SWI may be valuable in preoperative counseling, operative planning, and postoperative management. Although sternal wound complications can be successfully managed by plastic surgical intervention, preventing the development of median sternotomy complications may curb costs incurred by both patients and health care systems.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dehiscence; Infection; Mediastinitis; Reconstruction; Risk factors; Sternal wound; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26371410     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  8 in total

Review 1.  The contribution of interleukin-2 to effective wound healing.

Authors:  Karen M Doersch; Daniel J DelloStritto; M Karen Newell-Rogers
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-10-25

2.  Operative techniques for improving surgical exposure in basic cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dawn S Hui; Jason M Lizalek; Vikram S Chawa; Richard Lee
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-04-27

3.  The impact of surgical site occurrences and the role of closed incision negative pressure therapy.

Authors:  Christian Willy; Michael Engelhardt; Marcus Stichling; Onnen Grauhan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis.

Authors:  Pankaj Kaul
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Analysis of sternal healing after median sternotomy in low risk patients at midterm follow-up: retrospective cohort study from two centres.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Dapu He; Min Wang; Yongxiang Qian; Youran Lu; Xinping Shi; Yang Liu; Xianghong Zhan; Dongmei Di; Kai Zhu; Xiaoying Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Deep sternal wound infection - latissimus dorsi flap is a reliable option for reconstruction of the thoracic wall.

Authors:  Nick Spindler; Stefanie Kade; Ulrich Spiegl; Martin Misfeld; Christoph Josten; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Michael Borger; Stefan Langer
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  A nomogram prediction model for sternal incision problems.

Authors:  Pan You; Xin Zhou; Ping He; Jian Zhang; Tongchun Mao; Xiang Li; Wei Wang; Renguo Wen; Ruiyan Ma; Shaoliang Wang; Yiming Zhang; Yingbin Xiao
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Outcome of abdominal binder in midline abdominal wound Dehiscence in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure.

Authors:  Ahmed Siddique Ammar; Syed Asghar Naqi; Shehrbano Khattak; Ahmed Raza Noumani
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.