PURPOSE: Scale-up and spread of evidence-based practices is one of the most important challenges facing health care. We tested whether a statewide initiative, Depression Improvement Across Minnesota-Offering a New Direction (DIAMOND), to implement the collaborative care model for depression in 75 primary care clinics resulted in patient outcome improvements corresponding to those reported in randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Health plans provided a new monthly payment to participating clinics after a 6-month intensive training program with ongoing data submission, networking, and consultation. Implementation was staggered, with 5 sequences of 10 to 40 clinics every 6 months. Payers provided weekly contact information for members from participating clinics who were filling antidepressant prescriptions, and we conducted baseline and 6-month surveys of 1,578 patients about their care and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 466 patients in DIAMOND clinics who received usual care before implementation (UCB), 559 who received usual care in DIAMOND clinics after implementation (UCA), 245 who received DIAMOND care after implementation (DCA), and 308 who receivedusual care in comparison clinics (UC). Patients who received DIAMOND care after implementation reported more collaborative care depression services than the 3 comparison groups (10.9 vs 6.4-6.7, on a scale of 0 of 14, where higher numbers indicate more services; P <.001) and more satisfaction with their care (4.0 vs 3.4 on a scale 1 to 5, in which higher scores indicate higher satisfaction; P ≤.001). Depression remission rates, however, were not significantly different among the 4 groups (36.4% DCA vs 35.8% UCB, 35.0% UCA, 33.9% UC; P = .94). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the incentive of a supporting payment change and intensive training and support for clinics volunteering to participate, no difference in depression outcomes was documented. Specific unmeasured actions present in trials but not present in these clinics may be critical for successful outcome improvement.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Scale-up and spread of evidence-based practices is one of the most important challenges facing health care. We tested whether a statewide initiative, Depression Improvement Across Minnesota-Offering a New Direction (DIAMOND), to implement the collaborative care model for depression in 75 primary care clinics resulted in patient outcome improvements corresponding to those reported in randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Health plans provided a new monthly payment to participating clinics after a 6-month intensive training program with ongoing data submission, networking, and consultation. Implementation was staggered, with 5 sequences of 10 to 40 clinics every 6 months. Payers provided weekly contact information for members from participating clinics who were filling antidepressant prescriptions, and we conducted baseline and 6-month surveys of 1,578 patients about their care and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 466 patients in DIAMOND clinics who received usual care before implementation (UCB), 559 who received usual care in DIAMOND clinics after implementation (UCA), 245 who received DIAMOND care after implementation (DCA), and 308 who received usual care in comparison clinics (UC). Patients who received DIAMOND care after implementation reported more collaborative care depression services than the 3 comparison groups (10.9 vs 6.4-6.7, on a scale of 0 of 14, where higher numbers indicate more services; P <.001) and more satisfaction with their care (4.0 vs 3.4 on a scale 1 to 5, in which higher scores indicate higher satisfaction; P ≤.001). Depression remission rates, however, were not significantly different among the 4 groups (36.4% DCA vs 35.8% UCB, 35.0% UCA, 33.9% UC; P = .94). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the incentive of a supporting payment change and intensive training and support for clinics volunteering to participate, no difference in depression outcomes was documented. Specific unmeasured actions present in trials but not present in these clinics may be critical for successful outcome improvement.
Authors: Emily Woltmann; Andrew Grogan-Kaylor; Brian Perron; Hebert Georges; Amy M Kilbourne; Mark S Bauer Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: John W Williams; Martha Gerrity; Tracey Holsinger; Steve Dobscha; Bradley Gaynes; Allen Dietrich Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Verughese Jacob; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Theresa Ann Sipe; Anilkrishna B Thota; Guthrie J Byard; Daniel P Chapman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kirsten M van Steenbergen-Weijenburg; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Eva K Horn; Harm W J van Marwijk; Aartjan T F Beekman; Frans F H Rutten; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Janine Archer; Peter Bower; Simon Gilbody; Karina Lovell; David Richards; Linda Gask; Chris Dickens; Peter Coventry Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-10-17
Authors: Elizabeth R Pfoh; Isabel Janmey; Amit Anand; Kathryn A Martinez; Irene Katzan; Michael B Rothberg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rebecca C Rossom; Leif I Solberg; Emily D Parker; A Lauren Crain; Robin Whitebird; Michael Maciosek; Beth Molitor; Michael Trangle; Jürgen Unützer Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Lisa Saldana; Ian Bennett; Diane Powers; Mindy Vredevoogd; Tess Grover; Holle Schaper; Mark Campbell Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2020-03
Authors: Jamile A Ashmore; Kirk W Ditterich; Claire C Conley; Melissa R Wright; Peggy S Howland; Kelly L Huggins; Jena Cooreman; Priscilla S Andrews; Donald R Nicholas; Lind Roberts; Larissa Hewitt; Joan N Scales; Jenny K Delap; Christine A Gray; Lynelle A Tyler; Charlotte Collins; Catherine M Whiting; Brittany M Brothers; Marlena M Ryba; Barbara L Andersen Journal: Am Psychol Date: 2018-07-19
Authors: Rebecca C Rossom; Leif I Solberg; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; A Lauren Crain; Arne Beck; Robin Whitebird; Russell E Glasgow Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Karen J Coleman; Mark Dreskin; Daniel L Hackett; Alisa Aunskul; Jialuo Liu; Tracy M Imley; Amy L Wolfner; Gabrielle F Beaubrun Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 5.128