OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to design, build and test a multielement receive coil array and position system, which is optimized for three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution dental and maxillomandibular MRI with high patient comfort. METHODS: A 14 + 1 coil array and positioning system, allowing easy handling by the technologists, reproducible positioning of the patients and high patient comfort, was tested with three healthy volunteers using a 3.0-T MRI machine (Siemens Skyra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). High-resolution 3D T1 weighted, water excitation T1 weighted and fat-saturated T2 weighted imaging sequences were scanned, and 3D image data were reformatted in different orientations and curvatures to aid diagnosis. RESULTS: The high number of receiving coils and the comfortable positioning of the coil array close to the patient's face provided a high signal-to-noise ratio and allowed high quality, high resolution, 3D image data to be acquired within reasonable scan times owing to the possibility of parallel image acquisition acceleration. Reformatting the isotropic 3D image data in different views is helpful for diagnosis, e.g. panoramic reconstruction. The visibility of soft tissues such as the mandibular canal, nutritive canals and periodontal ligaments was exquisite. CONCLUSIONS: The optimized MRI receive coil array and positioning system for dental and oral-maxillofacial imaging provides a valuable tool for detecting and diagnosing pathologies in dental and oral-maxillofacial structures while avoiding radiation dose. The high patient comfort, as achieved by our design, is very crucial, since image artefacts due to movement or failing to complete the examination jeopardize the diagnostic value of MRI examinations.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to design, build and test a multielement receive coil array and position system, which is optimized for three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution dental and maxillomandibular MRI with high patient comfort. METHODS: A 14 + 1 coil array and positioning system, allowing easy handling by the technologists, reproducible positioning of the patients and high patient comfort, was tested with three healthy volunteers using a 3.0-T MRI machine (Siemens Skyra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). High-resolution 3D T1 weighted, water excitation T1 weighted and fat-saturated T2 weighted imaging sequences were scanned, and 3D image data were reformatted in different orientations and curvatures to aid diagnosis. RESULTS: The high number of receiving coils and the comfortable positioning of the coil array close to the patient's face provided a high signal-to-noise ratio and allowed high quality, high resolution, 3D image data to be acquired within reasonable scan times owing to the possibility of parallel image acquisition acceleration. Reformatting the isotropic 3D image data in different views is helpful for diagnosis, e.g. panoramic reconstruction. The visibility of soft tissues such as the mandibular canal, nutritive canals and periodontal ligaments was exquisite. CONCLUSIONS: The optimized MRI receive coil array and positioning system for dental and oral-maxillofacial imaging provides a valuable tool for detecting and diagnosing pathologies in dental and oral-maxillofacial structures while avoiding radiation dose. The high patient comfort, as achieved by our design, is very crucial, since image artefacts due to movement or failing to complete the examination jeopardize the diagnostic value of MRI examinations.
Authors: C R Habermann; J Graessner; M C Cramer; D Aldefeld; F Reitmeier; F Weiss; M G Kaul; K U Petersen; M Jaehne; G Adam Journal: Rofo Date: 2005-04
Authors: Olga Tymofiyeva; Julian Boldt; Kurt Rottner; Florian Schmid; Ernst-Juergen Richter; Peter M Jakob Journal: MAGMA Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Alexandre T Assaf; Tomislav A Zrnc; Chressen C Remus; Michael Schönfeld; Christian R Habermann; Björn Riecke; Reinhard E Friedrich; Jens Fiehler; Max Heiland; Jan Sedlacik Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Alexander Heil; Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Constanze Jelinek; Manuel Fischer; Marcel Prager; Eduardo Lazo Gonzalez; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland; Tim Hilgenfeld Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2017-11-03 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Alexander Juerchott; Christian Freudlsperger; Dorothea Weber; Johann M E Jende; Muhammad Abdullah Saleem; Sebastian Zingler; Christopher J Lux; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland; Tim Hilgenfeld Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Silwan Mendes; Carin A Rinne; Julia C Schmidt; Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt; Clemens Walter Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Alexander Heil; Eduardo Lazo Gonzalez; Tim Hilgenfeld; Philipp Kickingereder; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland; Ann-Kathrin Ozga; Andreas Sommer; Christopher J Lux; Sebastian Zingler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander Juerchott; Muhammad Abdullah Saleem; Tim Hilgenfeld; Christian Freudlsperger; Sebastian Zingler; Christopher J Lux; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tim Hilgenfeld; Alexander Juerchott; Johann M E Jende; Peter Rammelsberg; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Franz S Schwindling Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christoph Roser; Tim Hilgenfeld; Sinan Sen; Tobias Badrow; Sebastian Zingler; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Christopher J Lux; Alexander Juerchott Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.573