| Literature DB >> 26370530 |
Yu Li1, Wan Yang2, Xiaoli Chen1, Lin Li1, Qingxue Zhang1, Dongzi Yang1.
Abstract
This retrospective study is to compare the follicular mild stimulation and luteal simulation protocols for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 131 women were diagnosed as poor responders. Thirty-three women started ovarian stimulation in early-luteal phase and 98 women started in early follicular phase with 100 mg/d clomiphene citrate and 75-150 IU/d HMG. There were more oocytes retrieved (2.8 ± 2.0 versus 2.0 ± 1.2, p < 0.05), more available embryos (1.8 ± 1.4 versus 1.3 ± 1.1, p < 0.05) and top-quality embryos (0.9 ± 0.9 versus 0.4 ± 0.6, p < 0.05), and reduced cycle cancellation rate (12.1% versus 30.6%, p < 0.05) in luteal group than in follicular group. The clinical pregnancy (17.7%, 20.0% and 41.2%) and live-birth rates (10.78%, 20.0% and 29.4%) after transferring embryos obtained from luteal, follicular and mixed stages were comparable (p > 0.05). For poor responders, luteal phase stimulation could be an option because of increasing the chance to obtain competent embryos and reducing the cycle cancellation rate.Entities:
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; in vitro fertilization; luteal phase; ovarian stimulation; poor ovarian response
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26370530 DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1081683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gynecol Endocrinol ISSN: 0951-3590 Impact factor: 2.260