Literature DB >> 26370357

Is high pressure postdilation safe in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds? Optical coherence tomography observations after noncompliant balloons inflated at more than 24 atmospheres.

Enrico Fabris1,2, Gianluca Caiazzo1, Ismail Dogu Kilic1,3, Roberta Serdoz1, Gioel Gabrio Secco1,4, Gianfranco Sinagra2, Renick Lee5, Nicolas Foin5, Carlo Di Mario1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to investigate integrity and expansion of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds (BVS) after high-pressure postdilation (HPPD).
BACKGROUND: Because of concerns about the risk of BVS damage, postdilation was not recommended and applied in the existing randomized studies and most registries. Recent real world data suggest incomplete BVS expansion cause higher rates of thrombosis. In vivo confirmation of the safety of high pressure postdilation is of paramount importance.
METHODS: Data from final OCT examination of consecutive implanted BVS, postdilated with noncompliant (NC) balloons at pressure ≥24 atm were analyzed. The following stent performance indices were assessed with OCT: mean and minimal lumen and scaffold area, residual area stenosis (RAS), incomplete strut apposition (ISA), tissue prolapse, eccentricity index (EI), symmetry index (SI), strut fractures, and edge dissections. RESULT: Twenty-two BVS postdilated at high pressure were analyzed. The average maximal postdilation balloon inflation (maxPD) was 28 ± 3 atm. High pressure OPN NC Balloon (SIS Medical AG, Winterthur Switzerland) was used in 41% of postdilations with a maximal PD of 30 ± 4.7 atm. Final mean and minimal lumen area were 6.8 ± 1.4 and 5.5 ± 1.4 mm(2) , respectively. OCT showed low percentage of RAS (16 ± 9.6%), and low percentage of ISA (1.8 ± 2.4%). Mean EI was 0.86 ± 0.02 and SI 0.35 ± 0.14. OCT analysis showed one edge dissection and no scaffold fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: BVS deployment optimization using HPPD does not cause BVS disruption and is associated with a good BVS expansion, low rate of strut malapposition and edge dissections.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioresorbable vascular scaffolds; coronary angioplasty; noncompliant balloon; optical coherence tomography; struts apposition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26370357     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in coronary chronic total occlusions revascularization: safety assessment related to struts coverage and apposition in 6-month OCT follow-up.

Authors:  Rosa Alba Abellas-Sequeiros; Raymundo Ocaranza-Sanchez; Ramiro Trillo-Nouche; Carlos Gonzalez-Juanatey; Jose Ramon Gonzalez-Juanatey
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Optical coherence tomography guidance during bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation.

Authors:  Gioel Gabrio Secco; Monica Verdoia; Gianfranco Pistis; Giuseppe De Luca; Matteo Vercellino; Andrea Audo; Rosario Parisi; Maurizio Reale; Giorgio Ballestrero; Paolo Nicola Marino; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in daily clinical practice: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  W S Remkes; R S Hermanides; M W Kennedy; E Fabris; E Kaplan; J P Ottervanger; A W J van 't Hof; E Kedhi
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Florim Cuculi; Matthias Bossard; Wojciech Zasada; Federico Moccetti; Michiel Voskuil; Mathias Wolfrum; Krzysztof Piotr Malinowski; Stefan Toggweiler; Richard Kobza
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-01-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.