Literature DB >> 26370262

Different stimulation protocols for oocyte cryropreservation in oncological patients: a retrospective analysis of single university centre.

Giovanna Simi1, Maria Elena Rosa Obino1, Elena Casarosa1, Pietro Litta2, Paolo Giovanni Artini1, Vito Cela1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results obtain in cancer patients who receive the same controlled ovarian stimulation protocol, started in two different moments of the menstrual cycle, follicular or luteal phase. The stimulation is performed before cancer treatment in order to preserve fertility through oocytes cryopreservation. STUDY
DESIGN: The study is a retrospective analysis about 25 cancer patients at our centre, Department of Reproductive Medicine of University of Pisa, in order to preserve their fertility before cancer treatment. Patients are divided into two groups depending on the menstrual cycle phase, follicular or luteal phase, at the moment of first examination. Standard stimulation protocol with gonadotropins is administered in the follicular group, whereas in the second group we use GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) antagonist before gonadotropins administration in order to have a rapid luteolysis. The outcome measures are the number of days needed before starting procedure, duration of stimulation, cumulative dosage of gonadotropins number of oocyte retrieved and percentage of mature oocytes.
RESULTS: Any difference showed between two groups based on days of stimulation, total amount of gonadotropins administered and the number of good mature quality oocytes was retrieved. The real difference is the number of days needed to start the procedure, lesser in the luteal group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that oocytes can be obtained before cancer treatment, irrespective of menstrual cycle phase without compromising the efficacy of procedure. Moreover, starting ovarian stimulation anytime during menstrual cycle allows the patients to not postpone the beginning of cancer treatment. Different stimulation protocols, according to different kinds of disease, are available in order to obtain the maximum results without any complication for patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer patients; controlled ovarian stimulation; fertility preservation; follicular and luteal phase; oocyte cryopreservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26370262     DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1080237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  4 in total

1.  Estrogen treatment in infertile women with premature ovarian insufficiency in transitional phase: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Sara Pinelli; Paolo Giovanni Artini; Stefano Basile; Maria Elena Rosa Obino; Claudia Sergiampietri; Diana Giannarelli; Giovanna Simi; Vito Cela
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Twenty-five-year-old Woman with Bilateral Borderline Ovarian Tumour Desiring to Preserve Fertility - Case Report and Literature Review on the Current State of Fertility Preservation in Women with Borderline Ovarian Tumours.

Authors:  S Findeklee; L Lotz; K Heusinger; I Hoffmann; R Dittrich; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Long-term outcomes in cancer patients who did or did not pursue fertility preservation.

Authors:  Molly B Moravek; Rafael Confino; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer; Susan C Klock; Angela K Lawson; William J Gradishar; Mary Ellen Pavone
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Fertility Preservation: Current and Future Perspectives for Oncologic Patients at Risk for Iatrogenic Premature Ovarian Insufficiency.

Authors:  Sara Pinelli; Stefano Basile
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.