OBJECTIVE: In 2008, the federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) passed, prohibiting U.S. health plans from subjecting mental health and substance use disorder (behavioral health) coverage to more restrictive limitations than those applied to general medical care. This require d some health plans to make changes in coverage and management of services. The aim of this study was to examine private health plans' early responses to MHPAEA (after its 2010 implementation), in terms of both intended and unintended effects. METHODS: Data were from a nationally representative survey of commercial health plans regarding the 2010 benefit year and the preparity 2009 benefit year (weighted N=8,431 products; 89% response rate). RESULTS: Annual limits specific to behavioral health care were virtually eliminated between 2009 and 2010. Prevalence of behavioral health coverage was unchanged, and copayments for both behavioral and general medical services increased slightly. Prior authorization requirements for specialty medical and behavioral health outpatient services continued to decline, and the proportion of products reporting strict continuing review requirements increased slightly. Contrary to expectations, plans did not make significant changes in contracting arrangements for behavioral health services, and 80% reported an increase in size of their behavioral health provider network. CONCLUSIONS: The law had the intended effect of eliminating quantitative limitations that applied only to behavioral health care without unintended consequences such as eliminating behavioral health coverage. Plan decisions may also reflect other factors, including anticipation of the 2010 regulations and a continuation of trends away from requiring prior authorization.
OBJECTIVE: In 2008, the federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) passed, prohibiting U.S. health plans from subjecting mental health and substance use disorder (behavioral health) coverage to more restrictive limitations than those applied to general medical care. This require d some health plans to make changes in coverage and management of services. The aim of this study was to examine private health plans' early responses to MHPAEA (after its 2010 implementation), in terms of both intended and unintended effects. METHODS: Data were from a nationally representative survey of commercial health plans regarding the 2010 benefit year and the preparity 2009 benefit year (weighted N=8,431 products; 89% response rate). RESULTS: Annual limits specific to behavioral health care were virtually eliminated between 2009 and 2010. Prevalence of behavioral health coverage was unchanged, and copayments for both behavioral and general medical services increased slightly. Prior authorization requirements for specialty medical and behavioral health outpatient services continued to decline, and the proportion of products reporting strict continuing review requirements increased slightly. Contrary to expectations, plans did not make significant changes in contracting arrangements for behavioral health services, and 80% reported an increase in size of their behavioral health provider network. CONCLUSIONS: The law had the intended effect of eliminating quantitative limitations that applied only to behavioral health care without unintended consequences such as eliminating behavioral health coverage. Plan decisions may also reflect other factors, including anticipation of the 2010 regulations and a continuation of trends away from requiring prior authorization.
Authors: Colleen L Barry; Jon R Gabel; Richard G Frank; Samantha Hawkins; Heidi H Whitmore; Jeremy D Pickreign Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Howard H Goldman; Colleen L Barry; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Vanessa Azzone; Alisa B Busch; Haiden A Huskamp Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: P Kemper; D Blumenthal; J M Corrigan; P J Cunningham; S M Felt; J M Grossman; L T Kohn; C E Metcalf; R F St Peter; R C Strouse; P B Ginsburg Journal: Inquiry Date: 1996 Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: K John McConnell; Samuel H N Gast; M Susan Ridgely; Neal Wallace; Natalie Jacuzzi; Traci Rieckmann; Bentson H McFarland; Dennis McCarty Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Susan H Busch; Andrew J Epstein; Michael O Harhay; David A Fiellin; Hyong Un; Deane Leader; Colleen L Barry Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Jessica M Harwood; Francisca Azocar; Amber Thalmayer; Haiyong Xu; Michael K Ong; Chi-Hong Tseng; Kenneth B Wells; Sarah Friedman; Susan L Ettner Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Haiden A Huskamp; Hillary Samples; Scott E Hadland; Emma E McGinty; Teresa B Gibson; Howard H Goldman; Susan H Busch; Elizabeth A Stuart; Colleen L Barry Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Amber Gayle Thalmayer; Sarah A Friedman; Francisca Azocar; Jessica M Harwood; Susan L Ettner Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Sarah A Friedman; Amber G Thalmayer; Francisca Azocar; Haiyong Xu; Jessica M Harwood; Michael K Ong; Laura Lambert Johnson; Susan L Ettner Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Amber Gayle Thalmayer; Jessica M Harwood; Sarah Friedman; Francisca Azocar; L Amy Watson; Haiyong Xu; Susan L Ettner Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Andrew J Epstein; Elizabeth A Stuart; Rebecca L Haffajee; Emma E McGinty; Alisa B Busch; Haiden A Huskamp; Colleen L Barry Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 7.124