Literature DB >> 26369667

Fragile X syndrome: economic burden and health-related quality of life of patients and caregivers in France.

K Chevreul1,2,3, K Berg Brigham1,4, M Brunn1,2,3, V des Portes5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the main hereditary cause of intellectual disability. Although the associated burden appears to be considerable, to date no study has comprehensively assessed the cost incurred because of FXS, including its specific impact on health-related quality of life and the burden on caregivers using standardised quantitative tools. The aim of this article is to provide data in order to increase awareness of the repercussions of FXS on patients and caregivers as well as on the health and social care systems in France.
METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 145 patients recruited through Le Goëland X-Fragile and Mosaïques, the French FXS patient associations. Data on their demographic characteristics and resource use were obtained from an online questionnaire, and costs were estimated by a bottom-up approach. The EQ-5D health questionnaire was used to measure patients' and caregivers' health-related quality of life. Perceived burden of care was measured using the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview. The Barthel index, a non-utility-based assessment, was used to measure patients' level of dependence.
RESULTS: The annual total direct cost of FXS was estimated at €25 800 per patient. The main contributors were informal care provided by the main caregiver (€10 500) and social services (€8400). Healthcare costs, estimated at €2700, represented only a minor share. Mean EQ-5D utility scores were 0.49 for patients and 0.75 for caregivers. The mean burden for caregivers as measured by the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview was 39.9.
CONCLUSIONS: Fragile X syndrome requires significant resources that are mainly of a non-medical nature and are higher for children than for adults. Compared with related diseases, it constitutes a particularly high burden for caregivers. Using a bottom-up approach and a wide range of standardised measures, this study underscores the need for greater awareness of the burden of FXS as well as an assessment of new and existing interventions to address it.
© 2015 MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs; economic burden; fragile X syndrome; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26369667     DOI: 10.1111/jir.12215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res        ISSN: 0964-2633


  9 in total

1.  Spillover Effects on Caregivers' and Family Members' Utility: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Eve Wittenberg; Lyndon P James; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Extending the Parent-Delivered Early Start Denver Model to Young Children with Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Laurie A Vismara; Carolyn E B McCormick; Rebecca Shields; David Hessl
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-03

3.  Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah E Fitzpatrick; Lauren M Schmitt; Ryan Adams; Ernest V Pedapati; Logan K Wink; Rebecca C Shaffer; Jessica Sage; Jayne Dixon Weber; Kelli C Dominick; Craig A Erickson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-03

4.  Social/economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with fragile X syndrome in Europe.

Authors:  Karine Chevreul; Coralie Gandré; Karen Berg Brigham; Julio López-Bastida; Renata Linertová; Juan Oliva-Moreno; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar; Manuel Posada-de-la-Paz; Domenica Taruscio; Arrigo Schieppati; Georgi Iskrov; László Gulácsi; Johann Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg; Panos Kanavos; Ulf Persson; Giovani Fattore
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-04-12

5.  Pharmacologic Interventions for Irritability, Aggression, Agitation and Self-Injurious Behavior in Fragile X Syndrome: An Initial Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Eleanor M Eckert; Kelli C Dominick; Ernest V Pedapati; Logan K Wink; Rebecca C Shaffer; Howard Andrews; Tse-Hwei Choo; Chen Chen; Walter E Kaufmann; Nicole Tartaglia; Elizabeth M Berry-Kravis; Craig A Erickson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-11

Review 6.  Generic preference-based health-related quality of life in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ramesh Lamsal; Brittany Finlay; David G T Whitehurst; Jennifer D Zwicker
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Quantifying the economic impact of caregiving for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in Spain.

Authors:  David Flores; María P Ribate; Marisol Montolio; Feliciano J Ramos; Manuel Gómez; Cristina B García
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-05-12

8.  Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Different Diseases Measured With the EQ-5D-5L: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Haijing Guan; Luying Wang; Yao Zhang; Mingjun Rui; Aixia Ma
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29

9.  Mavoglurant in Fragile X Syndrome: Results of two open-label, extension trials in adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Randi Hagerman; Sebastien Jacquemont; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Vincent Des Portes; Andrew Stanfield; Barbara Koumaras; Gerd Rosenkranz; Alessandra Murgia; Christian Wolf; George Apostol; Florian von Raison
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.