Literature DB >> 26369522

The effect of heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation on Aδ-, C- and Aβ-fibre brain responses in humans.

Diana M Torta1, Maxim V Churyukanov1,2, Leon Plaghki1, André Mouraux1.   

Abstract

Human studies have shown that heterotopic nociceptive conditioning stimulation (HNCS) applied to a given body location reduces the percept and brain responses elicited by noxious test stimuli delivered at a remote body location. It remains unclear to what extent this effect of HNCS relies on the spinal-bulbar-spinal loop mediating the effect of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNICs) described in animals, and/or on top-down cortical mechanisms modulating nociception. Importantly, some studies have examined the effects of HNCS on the brain responses to nociceptive input conveyed by Aδ-fibres. In contrast, no studies have explored the effects of HNCS on the responses to selective nociceptive C-fibre input and non-nociceptive Aβ-fibre input. In this study, we measured the intensity of perception and event-related potentials (ERPs) to stimuli activating Aδ-, C- and Aβ-fibres, before, during and after HNCS, obtained by immersing one foot in painful cold water. We observed that (i) the perceived intensity of nociceptive Aδ- and C-stimuli was reduced during HNCS, and (ii) the ERPs elicited by Aδ- and Aβ- and C-stimuli were also reduced during HNCS. Importantly, because Aβ-ERPs are related to primary afferents that ascend directly through the dorsal columns without being relayed at spinal level, the modulation of these responses may not be explained by an influence of descending projections modulating the transmission of nociceptive input at spinal level. Therefore, our results indicate that, in humans, HNCS should be used with caution as a direct measure of DNIC-related mechanisms.
© 2015 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cold pressor test; diffuse noxious inhibitory control; event-related potentials; heterotopic noxious conditioning stimuli; pain

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26369522      PMCID: PMC5321533          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  41 in total

1.  An electrophysiological investigation into the pain-relieving effects of heterotopic nociceptive stimuli. Probable involvement of a supraspinal loop.

Authors:  A Roby-Brami; B Bussel; J C Willer; D Le Bars
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in man. Involvement of the spinoreticular tract.

Authors:  T De Broucker; P Cesaro; J C Willer; D Le Bars
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

4.  Depressive effects of segmental and heterotopic application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and piezo-electric current on lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human subjects.

Authors:  N Danziger; S Rozenberg; P Bourgeois; G Charpentier; J C Willer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in man: involvement of an opioidergic link.

Authors:  J C Willer; D Le Bars; T De Broucker
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1990-07-03       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  Enhanced brain responses to C-fiber input in the area of secondary hyperalgesia induced by high-frequency electrical stimulation of the skin.

Authors:  Emanuel N van den Broeke; André Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cerebral potentials evoked by painful, laser stimuli in patients with syringomyelia.

Authors:  R D Treede; J Lankers; A Frieling; W H Zangemeister; K Kunze; B Bromm
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Psychophysical and electrophysiological approaches to the pain-relieving effects of heterotopic nociceptive stimuli.

Authors:  J C Willer; A Roby; D Le Bars
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Chronic pain and medullary descending facilitation.

Authors:  Frank Porreca; Michael H Ossipov; G F Gebhart
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Beep tones attenuate pain following Pavlovian conditioning of an endogenous pain control mechanism.

Authors:  Raymonde Scheuren; Fernand Anton; Nathalie Erpelding; Gilles Michaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain.

Authors:  Janie Damien; Luana Colloca; Carmen-Édith Bellei-Rodriguez; Serge Marchand
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.230

2.  Segmental Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation Does not Reduce Pain Amplification and the Associated Pain-Related Brain Activity in a Capsaicin-Heat Pain Model.

Authors:  Benjamin Provencher; Stéphane Northon; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-01

3.  Inhibition of electroacupuncture on nociceptive responses of dorsal horn neurons evoked by noxious colorectal distention in an intensity-dependent manner.

Authors:  Lingling Yu; Wei Wang; Liang Li; Qingguang Qin; Yutian Yu; Kun Liu; Yufeng Zhao; Peijing Rong; Bing Zhu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Not as "blurred" as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system.

Authors:  Wacław M Adamczyk; Tibor M Szikszay; Tiffany Kung; Gabriela F Carvalho; Kerstin Luedtke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.926

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.