| Literature DB >> 26368339 |
Zilin Song1, Chao Zhang2, Guobin Liu2, Dong Qu1, Sha Xue2.
Abstract
The application of fractal geometry to describe soil structure is an increasingly useful tool for better understanding the performance of soil systems. Only a few studies, however, have focused on the structure of rhizospheric zones, where energy flow and nutrient recycling most frequently occur. We used fractal dimensions to investigate the characteristics of particle-size distribution (PSD) in the rhizospheres and bulk soils of six croplanEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26368339 PMCID: PMC4569335 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Change of plant characteristics during the natural succession [26].
| Abandoned cropland | Dominant species / Main companion species | Coverage (%) | Aboveground biomass (g m-2) | Root biomass (g m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1- yr |
| 75.2 ± 10.4 | 454.5 ± 27.9 | 181.9 ± 26.0 |
| 5- yr |
| 37.4 ± 3.0 12.6 ±1.8 | 128.3 ± 17.9 60.5 ± 8.4 | 67.4 ± 10.0 20.1 ± 3.4 |
| 10- yr |
| 31.7 ±4.1 22.5 ± 2.8 | 131.5 ± 12.5 100.8 ± 14.1 | 48.6 ± 4.7 36.3 ± 5.9 |
| 15- yr |
| 30.4 ± 3.8 3.6 ± 1.2 | 235.5 ± 13.7 22.5 ± 3.01 | 183.8 ± 21.2 20.4 ± 3.1 |
| 20- yr |
| 30.8 ± 4.7 10.2 ± 1.6 | 256.8 ± 29.7 68.4 ± 6.9 | 81.5 ± 9.6 59.7 ± 6.3 |
| 30- yr |
| 68.6 ± 5.6 | 270.2 ± 20.5 | 199.8 ± 17.1 |
The results was expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 3). A. capillaries: Artemisia capillaries; A. sacrorum: Artemisia sacrorum; H. altaicus: Heteropappus altaicus; S. Bungeana: Stipa bungeana
Change of soil organic C and total N during the natural succession [26].
| Abandoned cropland | Dominant species/Main companion species | Soils | Organic C (g kg-1) | Total N (g kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-yr |
| Rhizophere | 3.44 ± 0.25 | 0.44 ± 0.06 |
| Bulk | 2.99 ± 0.32 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | ||
| 5-yr |
| Rhizophere | 4.63 ± 0.44 | 0.52 ± 0.02 |
|
| Rhizophere | 4.14 ± 0.40 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | |
| Bulk | 3.29 ± 0.62 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | ||
| 10-yr |
| Rhizophere | 4.85 ± 0.50 | 0.55 ± 0.05 |
|
| Rhizophere | 4.13 ± 0.31 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | |
| Bulk | 3.16 ± 0.34 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | ||
| 15-yr |
| Rhizophere | 5.88 ± 0.21 | 0.64 ± 0.08 |
|
| Rhizophere | 4.96 ± 0.41 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | |
| Bulk | 4.40 ± 0.43 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | ||
| 20-yr |
| Rhizophere | 8.80 ± 0.61 | 0.78 ± 0.02 |
|
| Rhizophere | 6.64 ± 0.52 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | |
| Bulk | 5.65 ± 0.55 | 0.65 ± 0.07 | ||
| 30-yr |
| Rhizophere | 7.87 ± 0.35 | 0.80 ± 0.09 |
| Bulk | 5.36 ± 0.68 | 0.61 ± 0.05 |
The results was expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 3).
Particle size distribution (PSD) and fractal dimension (D) of rhizosphere soil and bulk soil during the natural succession.
| Sites | Dominant species/ Companion species | Soils | Clay % (<0.002 mm) | Silt % (0.002–0.05mm) | Sand % (0.05–1mm) | Fractal dimension ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 10.03±1.26 b | 52.85±1.02 b | 37.12±3.12 a | 2.102±0.025 b | 0.916 |
| Bulk | 16.39±1.13 a | 60.76±2.41 a | 22.85±2.07 b | 2.459±0.021 a | 0.906 | ||
| 5-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 11.83±1.87 a | 54.12±0.99 b | 34.05±2.26 a | 2.119±0.011 b | 0.946 |
|
| Rhizosphere | 12.17±1.15 a | 53.23±1.24 b | 34.60±2.54 a | 2.224±0.024 b | 0.910 | |
| Bulk | 14.09±1.04 a | 60.07±1.16 a | 25.21±1.65 b | 2.451±0.055 a | 0.898 | ||
| 10-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 12.25±1.18 a | 53.02±1.20 b | 35.73±1.49 a | 2.319±0.022 b | 0.906 |
|
| Rhizosphere | 12.76±1.05 a | 55.06±0.97 b | 32.18±1.44 b | 2.336±0.017 b | 0.912 | |
| Bulk | 13.27±1.23 a | 58.58±0.57 a | 28.14±1.42 c | 2.394±0.024 a | 0.933 | ||
| 15-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 9.41±2.00 b | 54.84±1.02 b | 35.75±1.13 a | 2.307±0.017 b | 0.885 |
|
| Rhizosphere | 8.77±1.88 b | 54.10±1.15 b | 37.13±2.06 a | 2.340±0.015 b | 0.899 | |
| Bulk | 13.08±1.11 a | 58.51±1.66 a | 28.41±0.77 b | 2.362±0.029 a | 0.903 | ||
| 20-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 16.62±1.24a | 52.11±0.99 b | 31.17±2.25 a | 2.410±0.072 a | 0.923 |
|
| Rhizosphere | 15.59±1.62 a | 52.64±1.37 b | 31.77±2.01 a | 2.418±0.064 a | 0.911 | |
| Bulk | 11.37±0.53 b | 55.98±1.16 a | 32.65±1.47 a | 2.337±0.089 a | 0.900 | ||
| 30-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 14.78±1.44 a | 55.87±1.03 a | 29.35±3.12 a | 2.441±0.057 a | 0.916 |
| Bulk | 11.11±2.72 a | 54.63±1.47 a | 34.26±2.32 a | 2.214±0.109 a | 0.921 |
The results was expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 3). Different letters indicate the significant difference between the rhizosphere soil and bulk soil at p<0.05. R 2 is the coefficient of determination.
Fig 1Change of particle-size distribution and fractal dimension in the rhizosphere soils during the natural succession (a-d).
Vertical bars indicate standard deviations of means (n = 3). Different letters indicate the significant difference at p<0.05.
Fig 2Change of particle-size distribution and fractal dimension in the bulk soils during the natural succession (a-d).
Vertical bars indicate standard deviations of means (n = 3). Different letters indicate the significant difference at p<0.05.
Fig 3Relationships between fractal dimension and soil clay contents.
Fig 6Relationships between fractal dimension, organic C and total N in the rhizosphere and bulk soils (a-d).
Fig 5Relationships between fractal dimension and soil sand contents.
Fig 4Relationships between fractal dimension and soil silt contents.
Pearson correlation between soil PSD and plant characteristics.
| Parameters | Clay | Silt | Sand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage | -0.716 | -0750 | 0.831 |
| Aboveground biomass | -0.803 | -0.781 | 0.774 |
| Root biomass | -0.799 | -0.817 | 0.805 |
*Correlation is significant at the p<0.05 level (2-tailed)
**Correlation is significant at the p<0.01 level (2-tailed).