| Literature DB >> 26368339 |
Zilin Song1, Chao Zhang2, Guobin Liu2, Dong Qu1, Sha Xue2.
Abstract
The application of fractal geometry to describe soil structure is an increasingly useful tool for better understanding the performance of soil systems. Only a few studies, however, have focused on the structure of rhizospheric zones, where energy flow and nutrient recycling most frequently occur. We used fractal dimensions to investigate the characteristics of particle-size distribution (PSD) in the rhizospheres and bulk soils of six croplands abandoned for 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 years on the Loess Plateau of China and evaluated the changes over successional time. The PSDs of the rhizospheres and the fractal dimensions between rhizosphere soil and bulk soils during the natural succession differed significantly due to the influence of plant roots. The rhizospheres had higher sand (0.05-1.00 mm) contents, lower silt (<0.002 mm) contents, and lower fractal dimensions than the bulk soils during the early and intermediate successional stages (1-15 years). The fractal dimensions of the rhizosphere soil and bulk soil ranged from 2.102 to 2.441 and from 2.214 to 2.459, respectively, during the 30-year restoration. Rhizospheric clay and silt contents and fractal dimension tended to be higher and sand content tended to be lower as abandonment age increased, but the bulk soils had the opposite trend. Linear regression analysis indicated that the fractal dimensions of both the rhizospheres and bulk soils were significantly linearly correlated with clay, sand, organic-carbon, and total-nitrogen contents, with R2 ranging from 0.526 to 0.752 (P<0.001). In conclusion, PSD differed significantly between the rhizosphere soil and bulk soil. The fractal dimension was a sensitive and useful index for quantifying changes in the properties of the different soil zones. This study will greatly aid the application of the fractal method for describing soil structure and nutrient status and the understanding of the performance of rhizospheric zones during ecological restoration.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26368339 PMCID: PMC4569335 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Change of plant characteristics during the natural succession [26].
| Abandoned cropland | Dominant species / Main companion species | Coverage (%) | Aboveground biomass (g m-2) | Root biomass (g m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1- yr |
| 75.2 ± 10.4 | 454.5 ± 27.9 | 181.9 ± 26.0 |
| 5- yr |
| 37.4 ± 3.0 12.6 ±1.8 | 128.3 ± 17.9 60.5 ± 8.4 | 67.4 ± 10.0 20.1 ± 3.4 |
| 10- yr |
| 31.7 ±4.1 22.5 ± 2.8 | 131.5 ± 12.5 100.8 ± 14.1 | 48.6 ± 4.7 36.3 ± 5.9 |
| 15- yr |
| 30.4 ± 3.8 3.6 ± 1.2 | 235.5 ± 13.7 22.5 ± 3.01 | 183.8 ± 21.2 20.4 ± 3.1 |
| 20- yr |
| 30.8 ± 4.7 10.2 ± 1.6 | 256.8 ± 29.7 68.4 ± 6.9 | 81.5 ± 9.6 59.7 ± 6.3 |
| 30- yr |
| 68.6 ± 5.6 | 270.2 ± 20.5 | 199.8 ± 17.1 |
The results was expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 3). A. capillaries: Artemisia capillaries; A. sacrorum: Artemisia sacrorum; H. altaicus: Heteropappus altaicus; S. Bungeana: Stipa bungeana
Change of soil organic C and total N during the natural succession [26].
| Abandoned cropland | Dominant species/Main companion species | Soils | Organic C (g kg-1) | Total N (g kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-yr |
| Rhizophere | 3.44 ± 0.25 | 0.44 ± 0.06 |
| Bulk | 2.99 ± 0.32 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | ||
| 5-yr |
| Rhizophere | 4.63 ± 0.44 | 0.52 ± 0.02 |
|
| Rhizophere | 4.14 ± 0.40 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | |
| Bulk | 3.29 ± 0.62 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | ||
| 10-yr |
| Rhizophere | 4.85 ± 0.50 | 0.55 ± 0.05 |
|
| Rhizophere | 4.13 ± 0.31 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | |
| Bulk | 3.16 ± 0.34 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | ||
| 15-yr |
| Rhizophere | 5.88 ± 0.21 | 0.64 ± 0.08 |
|
| Rhizophere | 4.96 ± 0.41 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | |
| Bulk | 4.40 ± 0.43 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | ||
| 20-yr |
| Rhizophere | 8.80 ± 0.61 | 0.78 ± 0.02 |
|
| Rhizophere | 6.64 ± 0.52 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | |
| Bulk | 5.65 ± 0.55 | 0.65 ± 0.07 | ||
| 30-yr |
| Rhizophere | 7.87 ± 0.35 | 0.80 ± 0.09 |
| Bulk | 5.36 ± 0.68 | 0.61 ± 0.05 |
The results was expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 3).
Particle size distribution (PSD) and fractal dimension (D) of rhizosphere soil and bulk soil during the natural succession.
| Sites | Dominant species/ Companion species | Soils | Clay % (<0.002 mm) | Silt % (0.002–0.05mm) | Sand % (0.05–1mm) | Fractal dimension ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 10.03±1.26 b | 52.85±1.02 b | 37.12±3.12 a | 2.102±0.025 b | 0.916 |
| Bulk | 16.39±1.13 a | 60.76±2.41 a | 22.85±2.07 b | 2.459±0.021 a | 0.906 | ||
| 5-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 11.83±1.87 a | 54.12±0.99 b | 34.05±2.26 a | 2.119±0.011 b | 0.946 |
|
| Rhizosphere | 12.17±1.15 a | 53.23±1.24 b | 34.60±2.54 a | 2.224±0.024 b | 0.910 | |
| Bulk | 14.09±1.04 a | 60.07±1.16 a | 25.21±1.65 b | 2.451±0.055 a | 0.898 | ||
| 10-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 12.25±1.18 a | 53.02±1.20 b | 35.73±1.49 a | 2.319±0.022 b | 0.906 |
|
| Rhizosphere | 12.76±1.05 a | 55.06±0.97 b | 32.18±1.44 b | 2.336±0.017 b | 0.912 | |
| Bulk | 13.27±1.23 a | 58.58±0.57 a | 28.14±1.42 c | 2.394±0.024 a | 0.933 | ||
| 15-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 9.41±2.00 b | 54.84±1.02 b | 35.75±1.13 a | 2.307±0.017 b | 0.885 |
|
| Rhizosphere | 8.77±1.88 b | 54.10±1.15 b | 37.13±2.06 a | 2.340±0.015 b | 0.899 | |
| Bulk | 13.08±1.11 a | 58.51±1.66 a | 28.41±0.77 b | 2.362±0.029 a | 0.903 | ||
| 20-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 16.62±1.24a | 52.11±0.99 b | 31.17±2.25 a | 2.410±0.072 a | 0.923 |
|
| Rhizosphere | 15.59±1.62 a | 52.64±1.37 b | 31.77±2.01 a | 2.418±0.064 a | 0.911 | |
| Bulk | 11.37±0.53 b | 55.98±1.16 a | 32.65±1.47 a | 2.337±0.089 a | 0.900 | ||
| 30-yr |
| Rhizosphere | 14.78±1.44 a | 55.87±1.03 a | 29.35±3.12 a | 2.441±0.057 a | 0.916 |
| Bulk | 11.11±2.72 a | 54.63±1.47 a | 34.26±2.32 a | 2.214±0.109 a | 0.921 |
The results was expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 3). Different letters indicate the significant difference between the rhizosphere soil and bulk soil at p<0.05. R 2 is the coefficient of determination.
Fig 1Change of particle-size distribution and fractal dimension in the rhizosphere soils during the natural succession (a-d).
Vertical bars indicate standard deviations of means (n = 3). Different letters indicate the significant difference at p<0.05.
Fig 2Change of particle-size distribution and fractal dimension in the bulk soils during the natural succession (a-d).
Vertical bars indicate standard deviations of means (n = 3). Different letters indicate the significant difference at p<0.05.
Fig 3Relationships between fractal dimension and soil clay contents.
Fig 6Relationships between fractal dimension, organic C and total N in the rhizosphere and bulk soils (a-d).
Fig 5Relationships between fractal dimension and soil sand contents.
Fig 4Relationships between fractal dimension and soil silt contents.
Pearson correlation between soil PSD and plant characteristics.
| Parameters | Clay | Silt | Sand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage | -0.716 | -0750 | 0.831 |
| Aboveground biomass | -0.803 | -0.781 | 0.774 |
| Root biomass | -0.799 | -0.817 | 0.805 |
*Correlation is significant at the p<0.05 level (2-tailed)
**Correlation is significant at the p<0.01 level (2-tailed).