Literature DB >> 26367337

Comparison of Two- and Three-Dimensional Methods for Analysis of Trunk Kinematic Variables in the Golf Swing.

Aimée C Smith1, Jonathan R Roberts, Eric S Wallace, Pui Kong, Stephanie E Forrester.   

Abstract

Two-dimensional methods have been used to compute trunk kinematic variables (flexion/extension, lateral bend, axial rotation) and X-factor (difference in axial rotation between trunk and pelvis) during the golf swing. Recent X-factor studies advocated three-dimensional (3D) analysis due to the errors associated with two-dimensional (2D) methods, but this has not been investigated for all trunk kinematic variables. The purpose of this study was to compare trunk kinematic variables and X-factor calculated by 2D and 3D methods to examine how different approaches influenced their profiles during the swing. Trunk kinematic variables and X-factor were calculated for golfers from vectors projected onto the global laboratory planes and from 3D segment angles. Trunk kinematic variable profiles were similar in shape; however, there were statistically significant differences in trunk flexion (-6.5 ± 3.6°) at top of backswing and trunk right-side lateral bend (8.7 ± 2.9°) at impact. Differences between 2D and 3D X-factor (approximately 16°) could largely be explained by projection errors introduced to the 2D analysis through flexion and lateral bend of the trunk and pelvis segments. The results support the need to use a 3D method for kinematic data calculation to accurately analyze the golf swing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26367337     DOI: 10.1123/jab.2015-0032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical Effects of Ball Position on Address Position Variables of Elite Golfers.

Authors:  Sung Eun Kim; Young-Chul Koh; Joon-Haeng Cho; Sae Yong Lee; Hae-Dong Lee; Sung-Cheol Lee
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  The required number of trials for biomechanical analysis of a golf swing.

Authors:  Anna C Severin; Sally G Barnes; Stewart A Tackett; C Lowry Barnes; Erin M Mannen
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.832

Review 3.  Golf Swing Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Methodological Recommendations for Kinematics.

Authors:  Maxime Bourgain; Philippe Rouch; Olivier Rouillon; Patricia Thoreux; Christophe Sauret
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Asymmetrical trunk movement during walking improved to normal range at 3 months after corrective posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel A C F Wong-Chung; Janneke J P Schimmel; Marinus de Kleuver; Noël L W Keijsers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Competitive-Level Differences in Trunk and Foot Kinematics of Underwater Undulatory Swimming.

Authors:  Takahiro Tanaka; Satoru Hashizume; Takahiko Sato; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.