Literature DB >> 26366824

Prenatal Diagnosis Procedures and Techniques to Obtain a Diagnostic Fetal Specimen or Tissue: Maternal and Fetal Risks and Benefits.

R Douglas Wilson1, Alain Gagnon2, François Audibert3, Carla Campagnolo4, June Carroll5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide maternity care providers and their patients with current evidence-based guidelines for maternal risk/benefit counselling for a prenatally identified at-risk pregnancy that requires ultrasound-guided prenatal diagnostic procedures and/or techniques for a genetic diagnosis and for subsequent pregnancy management decisions on questions such as level of obstetrical care provider, antenatal surveillance, location of care and delivery, and continuation or termination of pregnancy. This guideline is limited to maternal risk/benefit counselling and pregnancy management decisions for women who require, or are considering, an invasive ultrasound-guided procedure or technique for prenatal diagnosis. PATIENT POPULATION: Pregnant women identified as having an increased risk of a fetal genetic abnormality secondary to the process of established prenatal screening protocols (maternal serum±imaging, high-risk cell-free DNA results, abnormal diagnostic fetal imaging, or a positive family history of an inherited condition). These women may require or request counselling about pregnancy risks and benefits of an invasive ultrasound-guided procedure to determine the etiology, diagnosis, and/or pathology for the possible fetal anomaly or anomalies. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library in and prior to June 2014 using an appropriate controlled vocabulary (prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis, chorionic villi sampling, cordocentesis) and key words (prenatal screening, prenatal genetic counselling, post-procedural pregnancy loss rate). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies written in English and published from January 1985 to June 2014. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to June 2014. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical speciality societies. VALUES: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). Health benefits, side effects, and risks: Patient informed consent, knowledge translation, genetic prenatal risk assessment, anxiety relief, anxiety creation, advocacy, understanding or limitation for fetal testing, pregnancy management choice, pregnancy complication or loss, timely and improved care for birth of a neonate with recognized morbidity. Recommendations 1. The health care provider should counsel the at-risk pregnant woman on the different levels of genetic fetal testing in order for her to have a clear understanding and expectation of the level of testing and type of results that are offered. (III-B) 2. As part of the informed consent process, the health care provider should review with the at-risk pregnant woman the risks and benefits of in utero genetic diagnostic techniques associated with fetal genetic testing options. (III-A) 3. During risk/benefit counselling, the health care provider should advise that the best estimate of the pregnancy loss rate related to: a.amniocentesis is 0.5% to 1.0% (range 0.17 to 1.53%) (I) b.chorionic villus sampling is 0.5% to 1.0% (I) and c.cordocentesis or percutaneous umbilical blood sampling is 1.3% for fetuses with no anomalies and 1.3% to 25% for fetuses with single or multiple anomalies or intrauterine growth restriction. (II-2A).

Entities:  

Keywords:  amniocentesis; chorionic villi sampling; cordocentesis; prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counselling; prenatal procedure benefit; prenatal procedure risk

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26366824     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30205-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  3 in total

1.  Care Levels for Fetal Therapy Centers.

Authors:  Ahmet A Baschat; Sean B Blackwell; Debnath Chatterjee; James J Cummings; Stephen P Emery; Shinjiro Hirose; Lisa M Hollier; Anthony Johnson; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Francois I Luks; M Kathryn Menard; Lawrence B McCullough; Julie S Moldenhauer; Anita J Moon-Grady; George B Mychaliska; Michael Narvey; Mary E Norton; Mark D Rollins; Eric D Skarsgard; KuoJen Tsao; Barbara B Warner; Abigail Wilpers; Greg Ryan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 7.623

2.  A systematic review to guide future efforts in the determination of genetic causes of pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Andrew Z Carey; Nathan R Blue; Michael W Varner; Jessica M Page; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Aaron R Quinlan; D Ware Branch; Robert M Silver; Tsegaselassie Workalemahu
Journal:  Front Reprod Health       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  Is cervical swab an efficient method for developing a new noninvasive prenatal diagnostic test for numerical and structural chromosome anomalies?

Authors:  Erkan Yurtcu; Deniz Karçaaltıncaba; Hasan Hüseyin Kazan; Halis Özdemir; Meral Yirmibeş Karaoğuz; Pinar Çalış; Gülsüm Kayhan; Sezen Güntekin Ergün; Ferda Perçin; Merih Bayram; Mustafa Necmi İlhan; Gamze Bilgili; Tuğrul Kaymak; Mehmet Ali Ergün
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.