Literature DB >> 26366816

Relationship Between Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes in Northern Alberta.

Innie Chen1, Gian S Jhangri2, Michelle Lacasse3, Manoj Kumar4, Sujata Chandra3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Birth outcomes are known to be associated with birth spacing, but there are population differences. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between interpregnancy intervals and perinatal and neonatal outcomes in a Canadian population during the era of mandatory folate fortification of food.
METHODS: We conducted a study of 46 243 women who had two consecutive singleton births in northern Alberta between 1999 and 2007, using a linked provincial dataset. Perinatal outcomes of interest were preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age, and perinatal death. Neonatal outcomes were low Apgar score, low arterial blood gas pH, need for neonatal resuscitation or admission to NICU, and neonatal death. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for maternal demographic and obstetrical characteristics.
RESULTS: The risk of preterm birth was increased for multiple interpregnancy intervals: for an interval of 0 to 5 months, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 1.37 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.59), for 6 to 11 months the aOR was 1.18 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.34), for 24 to 35 months the aOR was 1.16 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.31), and for 36+ months the aOR was 1.36 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.53), compared with the reference interval of 12 to 17 months. The risk of LBW was increased with interpregnancy intervals of 0 to 5 months (aOR 1.48; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.80), 6 to 11 months (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.42), 24 to 35 months (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.41) and 36+ months (aOR 1.48; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.73). The risk of SGA was increased with intervals 0 to 5 months (aOR 1.29; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.52), 24 to 35 months (aOR 1.15; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.31), and 36+ months (aOR 1.26; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.44). The risk of perinatal death was increased with an interval of 36+ months (aOR 1.60; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.43). Similar associations were also observed for neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both short and long interpregnancy intervals are associated with adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes, and it provides risk estimates for a Canadian population in the era of folate fortification of food.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth spacing; interpregnancy interval; low birth weight; neonatal death; perinatal death; perinatal outcomes; preterm birth; small for gestational age

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26366816     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30197-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  8 in total

1.  Racial Differences in the Influence of Interpregnancy Interval on Fetal Growth.

Authors:  Mihir R Atreya; Louis J Muglia; James M Greenberg; Emily A DeFranco
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-03

2.  Short interpregnancy intervals, maternal folate levels, and infants born small for gestational age: a preliminary study in a Canadian supplement-using population.

Authors:  Buffy Chen; Prescilla Carrion; Ravneet Grewal; Angela Inglis; Catriona Hippman; Emily Morris; Heather Andrighetti; Arianne Albert; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.665

3.  Critical Factors Influencing the Acceptability of Post-placental Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Study in Six Public/Private Institutes in India.

Authors:  Hema Divakar; Ajey Bhardwaj; Chittaranjan Narhari Purandare; Thelma Sequeira; Pooja Sanghvi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-05-10

4.  Social correlates of term small for gestational age babies in a Russian Arctic setting.

Authors:  Anna A Usynina; Andrej M Grjibovski; Jon Øyvind Odland; Alexandra Krettek
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Duration of inter-pregnancy interval and its predictors among pregnant women in urban South Ethiopia: Cox gamma shared frailty modeling.

Authors:  Belayneh Hamdela Jena; Gashaw Andargie Biks; Yigzaw Kebede Gete; Kassahun Alemu Gelaye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Short birth interval and its associated factors among multiparous women in Mieso agro-pastoralist district, Eastern Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Musa Mohammed Wakeyo; Jemal Yusuf Kebira; Nega Assefa; Merga Dheresa
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-09-07

7.  Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine A Ahrens; Heidi Nelson; Reva L Stidd; Susan Moskosky; Jennifer A Hutcheon
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 8.  The Role of Extremes in Interpregnancy Interval in Women at Increased Risk for Adverse Obstetric Outcomes Due to Health Disparities: 
A Literature Review.

Authors:  Andrew S Thagard; Peter G Napolitano; Allison S Bryant
Journal:  Curr Womens Health Rev       Date:  2018-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.