Literature DB >> 26366787

Factors influencing variation in physician adenoma detection rates: a theory-based approach for performance improvement.

Louise Atkins1, Enid M Hunkeler2, Christopher D Jensen2, Susan Michie1, Jeffrey K Lee2, Chyke A Doubeni3, Ann G Zauber4, Theodore R Levin2, Virginia P Quinn5, Douglas A Corley2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Interventions to improve physician adenoma detection rates for colonoscopy have generally not been successful, and there are little data on the factors contributing to variation that may be appropriate targets for intervention. We sought to identify factors that may influence variation in detection rates by using theory-based tools for understanding behavior.
METHODS: We separately studied gastroenterologists and endoscopy nurses at 3 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers to identify potentially modifiable factors relevant to physician adenoma detection rate variability by using structured group interviews (focus groups) and theory-based tools for understanding behavior and eliciting behavior change: the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation behavior model; the Theoretical Domains Framework; and the Behavior Change Wheel.
RESULTS: Nine factors potentially associated with adenoma detection rate variability were identified, including 6 related to capability (uncertainty about which types of polyps to remove, style of endoscopy team leadership, compromised ability to focus during an examination due to distractions, examination technique during withdrawal, difficulty detecting certain types of adenomas, and examiner fatigue and pain), 2 related to opportunity (perceived pressure due to the number of examinations expected per shift and social pressure to finish examinations before scheduled breaks or the end of a shift), and 1 related to motivation (valuing a meticulous examination as the top priority). Examples of potential intervention strategies are provided.
CONCLUSIONS: By using theory-based tools, this study identified several novel and potentially modifiable factors relating to capability, opportunity, and motivation that may contribute to adenoma detection rate variability and be appropriate targets for future intervention trials.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26366787      PMCID: PMC4762744          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  43 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.

Authors:  G Imperiali; G Minoli; G M Meucci; G Spinzi; E Strocchi; V Terruzzi; F Radaelli
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  The Assessment, Monitoring, and Enhancement of Treatment Fidelity In Public Health Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Belinda Borrelli
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.821

Review 5.  Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Prestwich; Falko F Sniehotta; Craig Whittington; Stephan U Dombrowski; Lizzie Rogers; Susan Michie
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Improving detection during colonoscopy: multiple pathways for investigation.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 7.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  Behavioral and social sciences theories and models: are they used in unintentional injury prevention research?

Authors:  L B Trifiletti; A C Gielen; D A Sleet; K Hopkins
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2005-01-04

9.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.

Authors:  James Cane; Denise O'Connor; Susan Michie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Using theories of behaviour to understand transfusion prescribing in three clinical contexts in two countries: development work for an implementation trial.

Authors:  Jill J Francis; Alan Tinmouth; Simon J Stanworth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Marie Johnston; Chris Hyde; Charlotte Stockton; Jamie C Brehaut; Dean Fergusson; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  10 in total

1.  Modifiable Failures in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Process and Their Association With Risk of Death.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Stacey A Fedewa; Theodore R Levin; Christopher D Jensen; Chelsea Saia; Alexis M Zebrowski; Virginia P Quinn; Katharine A Rendle; Ann G Zauber; Tracy A Becerra-Culqui; Shivan J Mehta; Robert H Fletcher; Joanne Schottinger; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.

Authors:  Lou Atkins; Jill Francis; Rafat Islam; Denise O'Connor; Andrea Patey; Noah Ivers; Robbie Foy; Eilidh M Duncan; Heather Colquhoun; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Rebecca Lawton; Susan Michie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Specialist Clinicians' Management of Dependence on Non-Prescription Medicines and Barriers to Treatment Provision: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study Using Behavioural Theory.

Authors:  Niamh Fingleton; Eilidh Duncan; Margaret Watson; Catriona Matheson
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-05

4.  The impact of distraction minimization on endoscopic mentoring and performance.

Authors:  Sean C Rice; James C Slaughter; Walter Smalley; Keith L Obstein
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-11-17

5.  Determinants of orthopedic physicians' self-reported compliance with surgical site infection prevention: results of the WACH-trial's pilot survey on COM-B factors in a German university hospital.

Authors:  Ivonne Tomsic; Ella Ebadi; Frank Gossé; Ina Hartlep; Pamela Schipper; Christian Krauth; Bettina Schock; Iris F Chaberny; Thomas von Lengerke
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  Identifying barriers to the educational role of midwives in Cyprus and defining determinants in behaviour terms using the Behaviour Change Wheel: a mixed-method formative study.

Authors:  Nicos Middleton; Eleni Hadjigeorgiou; Ourania Kolokotroni; Veronika Christodoulides; Ioanna Koliandri; Christiana Nicolaou; Maria Papadopoulou; Christiana Kouta; Maria Karanikola; Alison Baum
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Maxime E S Bronzwaer; Marjolein J E Greuter; Arne G C Bleijenberg; Joep E G IJspeert; Evelien Dekker; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Using behaviour change and implementation science to address low referral rates in oncology.

Authors:  Janet C Long; Deborah Debono; Rachel Williams; Elizabeth Salisbury; Sharron O'Neill; Elizabeth Eykman; Jordan Butler; Robert Rawson; Kim-Chi Phan-Thien; Stephen R Thompson; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Melvin Chin; Natalie Taylor
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Factors perceived to influence implementation of task shifting in highly specialised healthcare: a theory-based qualitative approach.

Authors:  Eli Feiring; Astrid Eidesvik Lie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Investigating primary healthcare practitioners' barriers and enablers to referral of patients with COPD to pulmonary rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  Jane Suzanne Watson; Rachel Elizabeth Jordan; Peymane Adab; Ivo Vlaev; Alexandra Enocson; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.