Maartje I Kester1, Charlotte E Teunissen2, Daniel L Crimmins3, Elizabeth M Herries3, Jack H Ladenson3, Philip Scheltens1, Wiesje M van der Flier4, John C Morris5, David M Holtzman5, Anne M Fagan5. 1. Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 4. Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands4Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5. The Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri6Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri7Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington Universit.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Neurogranin (NGRN) seems to be a promising novel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker for synaptic loss; however, clinical, and especially longitudinal, data are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of NGRN, with repeated CSF sampling, for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal study of consecutive patients who underwent 2 lumbar punctures between the beginning of 1995 and the end of 2010 within the memory clinic-based Amsterdam Dementia Cohort. The study included 163 patients: 37 cognitively normal participants (mean [SE] age, 64 [2] years; 38% female; and mean [SE] Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score, 28 [0.3]), 61 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (mean [SE] age, 68 [1] years; 38% female; and mean [SE] MMSE score, 27 [0.3]), and 65 patients with AD (mean [SE] age, 65 [1] years; 45% female; and mean [SE] MMSE score, 22 [0.7]). The mean (SE) interval between lumbar punctures was 2.0 (0.1) years, and the mean (SE) duration of cognitive follow-up was 3.8 (0.2) years. Measurements of CSF NGRN levels were obtained in January and February 2014. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Levels of NGRN in CSF samples. RESULTS: Baseline CSF levels of NGRN in patients with AD (median level, 2381 pg/mL [interquartile range, 1651-3416 pg/mL]) were higher than in cognitively normal participants (median level, 1712 pg/mL [interquartile range, 1206-2724 pg/mL]) (P = .04). Baseline NGRN levels were highly correlated with total tau and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 in all patient groups (all P < .001), but not with Aβ42. Baseline CSF levels of NGRN were also higher in patients with MCI who progressed to AD (median level, 2842 pg/mL [interquartile range, 1882-3950 pg/mL]) compared with those with stable MCI (median level, 1752 pg/mL [interquartile range, 1024-2438 pg/mL]) (P = .004), and they were predictive of progression from MCI to AD (hazard ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.9]; stratified by tertiles). Linear mixed-model analyses demonstrated that within-person levels of NGRN increased over time in cognitively normal participants (mean [SE] level, 90 [45] pg/mL per year; P < .05) but not in patients with MCI or AD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Neurogranin is a promising biomarker for AD because levels were elevated in patients with AD compared with cognitively normal participants and predicted progression from MCI to AD. Within-person levels of NGRN increased in cognitively normal participants but not in patients with later stage MCI or AD, which suggests that NGRN may reflect presymptomatic synaptic dysfunction or loss.
IMPORTANCE: Neurogranin (NGRN) seems to be a promising novel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker for synaptic loss; however, clinical, and especially longitudinal, data are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of NGRN, with repeated CSF sampling, for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal study of consecutive patients who underwent 2 lumbar punctures between the beginning of 1995 and the end of 2010 within the memory clinic-based Amsterdam Dementia Cohort. The study included 163 patients: 37 cognitively normal participants (mean [SE] age, 64 [2] years; 38% female; and mean [SE] Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score, 28 [0.3]), 61 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (mean [SE] age, 68 [1] years; 38% female; and mean [SE] MMSE score, 27 [0.3]), and 65 patients with AD (mean [SE] age, 65 [1] years; 45% female; and mean [SE] MMSE score, 22 [0.7]). The mean (SE) interval between lumbar punctures was 2.0 (0.1) years, and the mean (SE) duration of cognitive follow-up was 3.8 (0.2) years. Measurements of CSF NGRN levels were obtained in January and February 2014. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Levels of NGRN in CSF samples. RESULTS: Baseline CSF levels of NGRN in patients with AD (median level, 2381 pg/mL [interquartile range, 1651-3416 pg/mL]) were higher than in cognitively normal participants (median level, 1712 pg/mL [interquartile range, 1206-2724 pg/mL]) (P = .04). Baseline NGRN levels were highly correlated with total tau and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 in all patient groups (all P < .001), but not with Aβ42. Baseline CSF levels of NGRN were also higher in patients with MCI who progressed to AD (median level, 2842 pg/mL [interquartile range, 1882-3950 pg/mL]) compared with those with stable MCI (median level, 1752 pg/mL [interquartile range, 1024-2438 pg/mL]) (P = .004), and they were predictive of progression from MCI to AD (hazard ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.9]; stratified by tertiles). Linear mixed-model analyses demonstrated that within-person levels of NGRN increased over time in cognitively normal participants (mean [SE] level, 90 [45] pg/mL per year; P < .05) but not in patients with MCI or AD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Neurogranin is a promising biomarker for AD because levels were elevated in patients with AD compared with cognitively normal participants and predicted progression from MCI to AD. Within-person levels of NGRN increased in cognitively normal participants but not in patients with later stage MCI or AD, which suggests that NGRN may reflect presymptomatic synaptic dysfunction or loss.
Authors: Hlin Kvartsberg; Flora H Duits; Martin Ingelsson; Niels Andreasen; Annika Öhrfelt; Kerstin Andersson; Gunnar Brinkmalm; Lars Lannfelt; Lennart Minthon; Oskar Hansson; Ulf Andreasson; Charlotte E Teunissen; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje M Van der Flier; Henrik Zetterberg; Erik Portelius; Kaj Blennow Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: G C Román; T K Tatemichi; T Erkinjuntti; J L Cummings; J C Masdeu; J H Garcia; L Amaducci; J M Orgogozo; A Brun; A Hofman Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M Ingelsson; H Fukumoto; K L Newell; J H Growdon; E T Hedley-Whyte; M P Frosch; M S Albert; B T Hyman; M C Irizarry Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-03-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ross W Paterson; Audrey Gabelle; Brendan P Lucey; Nicolas R Barthélemy; Claire A Leckey; Christophe Hirtz; Sylvain Lehmann; Chihiro Sato; Bruce W Patterson; Tim West; Kevin Yarasheski; Jonathan D Rohrer; Norelle C Wildburger; Jonathan M Schott; Celeste M Karch; Selina Wray; Timothy M Miller; Donald L Elbert; Henrik Zetterberg; Nick C Fox; Randall J Bateman Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Rawan Tarawneh; Gina D'Angelo; Dan Crimmins; Elizabeth Herries; Terry Griest; Anne M Fagan; Gregory J Zipfel; Jack H Ladenson; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Edward J Goetzl; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Janice B Schwartz; Iryna V Lobach; Laura Goetzl; Erin L Abner; Gregory A Jicha; Anna M Karydas; Adam Boxer; Bruce L Miller Journal: FASEB J Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Randall J Bateman; Tammie L Benzinger; Scott Berry; David B Clifford; Cynthia Duggan; Anne M Fagan; Kathleen Fanning; Martin R Farlow; Jason Hassenstab; Eric M McDade; Susan Mills; Katrina Paumier; Melanie Quintana; Stephen P Salloway; Anna Santacruz; Lon S Schneider; Guoqiao Wang; Chengjie Xiong Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Xiaoyan Sun; Chuanhui Dong; Bonnie Levin; Elizabeth Crocco; David Loewenstein; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Clinton B Wright Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 21.566