Literature DB >> 26366325

Consistency between beliefs and behavior regarding use of substances in recovery.

Lee Ann Kaskutas1, Lois A Ritter2.   

Abstract

This paper addresses the assumption that pathways to recovery from substance abuse and dependence, and the language used to define one's relationship to substances, translate to actual beliefs and behaviors in terms of substance use. We draw on social representation theory, and use data from a large web-based study (n=9,341) whose goal was to understand how individuals in recovery define what recovery means to them. We often hear people say that they are "in recovery," and present findings now provide empirical evidence of the prevalent meanings of this ubiquitous expression. The belief that recovery is abstinence was broadly held in our sample, especially among those exposed to treatment and 12-step self-help groups and who define themselves as in recovery-and most (but not all) of such individuals are complete abstainers (no alcohol or drugs). In contrast, among the "self-changers" who did not attend treatment or self-help groups, the most common self-definition was used to have an alcohol or drug problem but don't any more, half of whom believe that recovery is abstinence while half do not, and only one-third are abstainers. Findings are of public health relevance, as it is estimated that among American adults alone, 10% report having had alcohol or drug problems but no longer do (The New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (OASAS), 2012). In line with the central concepts of social representation theory, people's pathways to recovery have a strong effect on how they define themselves and their behaviors and beliefs, but it is not universal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  12-step groups; Addiction; Alcoholics Anonymous; medication-assisted recovery; mutual aid; natural recovery; recovery; self-changers; substance abuse; treatment

Year:  2015        PMID: 26366325      PMCID: PMC4566927          DOI: 10.1177/2158244015574938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sage Open        ISSN: 2158-2440


  8 in total

Review 1.  Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation.

Authors:  A T McLellan; D C Lewis; C P O'Brien; H D Kleber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice.

Authors:  Alexandre B Laudet
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2007-10

3.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

Review 4.  Spontaneous recovery in alcoholics: a review and analysis of the available research.

Authors:  R G Smart
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Estimating the effect of help-seeking on achieving recovery from alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Deborah A Dawson; Bridget F Grant; Frederick S Stinson; Patricia S Chou
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 6.  Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions.

Authors:  L C Sobell; T P Ellingstad; M B Sobell
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Multi-source recruitment strategies for advancing addiction recovery research beyond treated samples.

Authors:  Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman; Alexandre B Laudet; Lois A Ritter; Aina Stunz; Lee Ann Kaskutas
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2015-06-01

8.  12-step participation as a pathway to recovery: the Maryhaven experience and implications for treatment and research.

Authors:  Gregory S Brigham
Journal:  Sci Pract Perspect       Date:  2003-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.