| Literature DB >> 26366181 |
A G Bezerra1, G N Pires1, M L Andersen1, S Tufik1, H Hachul2.
Abstract
Sleep disorders are commonly observed among postmenopausal women, with negative effects on their quality of life. The search for complementary therapies for sleep disorders during postmenopausal period is of high importance, and acupuncture stands out as an appropriate possibility. The present review intended to systematically evaluate the available literature, compiling studies that have employed acupuncture as treatment to sleep disorders in postmenopausal women. A bibliographic search was performed in PubMed/Medline and Scopus. Articles which had acupuncture as intervention, sleep related measurements as outcomes, and postmenopausal women as target population were included and evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool and to the STRICTA guidelines. Out of 89 search results, 12 articles composed our final sample. A high heterogeneity was observed among these articles, which prevented us from performing a meta-analysis. Selected articles did not present high risk of bias and had a satisfactory compliance rate with STRICTA guidelines. In general, these studies presented improvements in sleep-related variables. Despite the overall positive effects, acupuncture still cannot be stated as a reliable treatment for sleep-related complaints, not due to inefficacy, but rather limited evidence. Nevertheless, results are promising and new comprehensive and controlled studies in the field are encouraged.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26366181 PMCID: PMC4561166 DOI: 10.1155/2015/563236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flowchart of articles selection of the current study.
Figure 2Time analysis of publication on the use of acupuncture for postmenopausal sleep-related complaints.
List and description of selected studies.
| Article | Article type | Sample description |
|
| Treatment condition | Type of treatment | Acupoints, exp | Acupoints, ctrl | Sleep assessment | Main results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hammes et al., 2014 [ | Case report | 49-y postmenopausal woman | 1 | NA | 22 sessions, weekly or biweekly | Body and auricular acupuncture | Sessions 1–6: LI-4, LR-3, CV-6, CV-17, HT-6, KI-6, KI-2, GV-20, auricular: ShenMen, kidney Sessions 7–22: LI-4, LR-3, CV-4, CV-6, CV-17, HT-6, KI-6, GB-41, GV-20, auricular: ShenMen, kidney | NA | Insomnia self-report | Improvement |
|
| ||||||||||
| Baccetti et al., 2014 [ | Randomized controlled trial | Postmenopausal women, ≥3 hot flushes episodes/day | 47 | 49 | Twice a week, during four weeks | B | Stimulation with star needles in dorsal region C7-T5. Electrostimulation: dispersion (100 cycles/s) on GV-23, CV-22, BL-2, LI-11, and LI-4; tonification (40 cycles/s) on SP-10 and SP-6; and tonification with GV-20, CV-4, CV-6, ST-37, and LR-3 | None | 1–4 scale about sleep disorders severity | Improvement |
|
| ||||||||||
| Hachul et al., 2013 [ | Randomized controlled trial | Postmenopausal women, insomnia | 9 | 9 | Twice a week, during five weeks | Body acupuncture | Not reported | Sham acupoints | PSQI and PSG | Improvements in SWS at PSG and in PSQI score |
|
| ||||||||||
| Painovich et al., 2012 [ | Randomized controlled trial | Peri- and postmenopausal women, at least seven VMS/day | 12 | 9/12 | Three times a week, during 12 weeks | Body acupuncture | GV-20, PC-6, HT-7, LV-3, LI-4, LI-11, KI-3, SP-6, ST-36, CV-17, CV-6, GV-14, GB-15, GB-18, GB-20, GB-23, GB-34, and KI-3 | Sham or none | PSQI | Nonsignificant |
|
| ||||||||||
| Kung et al., 2011 [ | Cohort | Postmenopausal women, insomnia | 45 | NA | Daily before sleep, during four weeks | Auricular acupuncture | ShenMen, kidney, heart, brainstem, and subcortex | NA | PSQI | Improvements in PSQI score, sleep latency, total sleep duration, and sleep efficiency |
|
| ||||||||||
| Borud et al., 2009 [ | Multicentric randomized controlled trial | Postmenopausal women, at least seven hot flushes/day | 134 | 133 | 10 sessions over 12 weeks | Body acupuncture (elective additional moxibustion) | Individualized and customized treatment | None | Sleep logs and WHQ | Improvement in total sleep time |
|
| ||||||||||
| Borud et al., 2010 [ | Follow-up on Borud et al., 2009 [ | Postmenopausal women, at least seven hot flushes/day | 134 | 133 | NA | NA | NA | NA | WHQ | Maintenance of results, as in Borud et al., 2009 [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| Avis et al., 2008 [ | Randomized controlled trial | Peri- or postmenopausal women, at least four hot flushes/day | 19 | 18 | Twice a week, during eight weeks | Body acupuncture | CV-4, KI-3, SP-6, BL-23, HT-6, KI-7 (possible additional points depending on diagnostic: KI-6, KI-10, GV-4, CV-6, BL-52, LR-3, LR-8, GB-20, BL-18, PC-7, GB-13, GV-20, taiyang, HT-7, HT-8, Yintang, CV-15, BL-15) | Sham acupoints | Women's Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale | Nonsignificant |
|
| ||||||||||
| Huang et al., 2006 [ | Randomized controlled trial | Postmenopausal women, at least 7 moderate or severe hot flushes/day | 12 | 17 | Nine sessions, during seven weeks | Body acupuncture | 5–7 acupoints from a previously defined list | Sham acupoints | PSQI | Nonsignificant |
|
| ||||||||||
|
Hu, 2005 [ | Case report | 51-y postmenopausal woman | 1 | NA | Three times a week, duration not clear | Body and auricular acupuncture | BL-23, BL-15, PC-7, HT-7, Anmian (extra), SP-6, LR-3, KI-3, BL-18, BL-20, GV-20, GV-24, EX-HN 3 Auricular: subcortex, sympathesis, ear-ShenMen, endocrine, ovary, kidney, spleen, and heart | NA | Insomnia self-report | Improvement |
|
| ||||||||||
| Cohen et al., 2003 [ | Randomized controlled trial | Postmenopausal woman, self- identification of menopausal hot flashes | 8 | 9 | Irregular schedule, total six sessions | Body acupuncture | BL-15, BL-23, BL-32, GV-20, HT-7, PC-6, SP-6, SP-9, LI-3 | Standard treatment, not related to menopause | 0–3 scale about sleep disorders severity | Nonsignificant between groups comparison Improvement in within-group comparison |
|
| ||||||||||
| Bijak, 2009 [ | Case report | 59-y postmenopausal woman | 1 | NA | Once a week, ten weeks | Body and auricular acupuncture | BL-17 (until the 4th session), BL-43 (5th until the 10th session), KI-3, BL-31, HT-3, LI-3, auricular: Jerome's point and sleep point (until the 4th session) | NA | Insomnia self-report | Improvement |
Exp: experimental group; ctrl: control group; n-exp: sample size at experimental group; n-ctrl: sample size at control group; NA: not applicable; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PSG: Polysomnography; WHQ: Women's Health Questionnaire; SWS: slow wave sleep.
Risk of bias assessment.
| Low risk | Unclear risk | High risk | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence generation ( | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Allocation concealment ( | 85.7% | 14.3% | 0.0% |
| Blinding of participants and personnel ( | 71.4% | 0.0% | 28.6% |
| Blinding of outcome assessors ( | 57.1% | 42.9% | 0.0% |
| Incomplete outcome data ( | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Selective outcome reporting ( | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other sources of bias ( | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evaluation according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Evaluation of the selected articles based on STRICTA criteria.
| Hammes et al., 2014 [ | Baccetti et al., 2014 [ | Hachul et al., 2013 [ | Painovich et al., 2012 [ | Kung et al., 2011 [ | Borud et al., 2009 [ | Avis et al., 2008 [ | Huang et al., 2006 [ | Hu, 2005 [ | Cohen et al., 2003 [ | Bijak, 2009 [ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Acupuncture rationale | (1a) Style of acupuncture | Yes, TCM | Yes, TCM, five elements | Yes, TCM | Yes, TCM | Yes, ear acupuncture | Yes, TCM | Yes, TCM | Yes, TCM | Yes, TCM, ear acupuncture | Yes, TCM | Yes,TCM, ear acupuncture |
| (1b) Reasoning for treatment provided | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| (1c) Extent to which treatment was varied | N/A, case report | Yes, partially individualized | Yes, no individualization | Yes, no individualization | Yes, no individualization | Yes, individualized treatment | Yes, partially individualized | Yes, partially individualized | N/A, case report | Yes, No individualization | N/A, case report | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| (2) Detail of needling | (2a) Number of needle insertions per subject per session | No | Yes for common protocol; No for individualized treatment | No | Yes, 28 points | Yes, 5 auricular points | No | Yes, 11 to 16 needle insertions per subject per section | Yes, 5–7 points | Yes, 21 points + 9 ear points | Yes, 9 points | Yes, 5 points + 2 ear points |
| (2b) Names or location of points used | Yes | Partially, Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Partially, Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| (2c) Depth of insertion | No | No | No | Yes, 0.5 to 1.5 in | No | No | Yes, 0.5 to 3 cm | No | No | No | No | |
| (2d) Response sought | Yes, needles inserted until deqi sensation was obtained | No | No | Yes, manually stimulated until reaching | No | Yes, deqi obtained, if possible | Yes, deqi obtained, if possible | No | No | No | No | |
| (2e) Needle stimulation | Yes, needling with tonifying technique | Yes | No | Yes, manually stimulated until reaching | No | Partially, needle manipulation allowed | No | No | No | No | Yes, superficial tonification | |
| (2f) Needle retention time | Yes, 20 min | Yes, 30 min | Yes, 30 min | Yes, 30 min | No | No | Yes, 20 min for anterior points; 10 min for posterior points | No | No | No | No | |
| (2g) Needle type | Yes, DBC Spring-Ten sterile and disposable needles 0.20 × 0.30 mm | No | Yes, disposable 0.25 × 40 mm acupuncture needles | No | Yes, 0.2 cm sized magnetic pellet on a 1 cm sized sticky patch (Ching-Ming Co., Taiwan) | No | Yes, Sterile, single-use, Vinco 34-gauge, 1-inch (0.22 25 mm) and 30-gauge, 1.5-inch (0.30 40 mm) | No | No | No | Yes, disposable 0.3 mm needles and ASP needles for auriculotherapy | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| (3) Treatment regimen | (3a) Number of treatment sessions | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| (3b) Frequency and duration of treatment sessions | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| (4) Other components of treatment | (4a) Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group | Yes, description about medicines | Yes, diet (according to TCM) and self-massage (TuiNa) | No | No | No | Yes, moxibustion was allowed | No | No | No | No | No |
| (4b) Setting and context of treatment, including instructions to practitioners, and information and explanations to patients | No | Yes, participants received instructions about diet and self-massage Practitioners received specific training before the beginning of the study | No | No | No | Yes, participants free to use self-provided care. | Yes, all study participants were instructed not to take hormonal medications or initiate other treatments for their hot flashes during treatment | Yes, acupuncturists were instructed to limit verbal contact to the most pertinent clinical information and to refrain from counseling and offering advice | Yes, take light food, more fruits and vegetables, and avoid greasy and spicy food, do appropriate physical exercises to strengthen the body constitution (among others) | No | No | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| (5) Practitioner background | (5a) Description of participating acupuncturists | No | Yes, sessions were conducted by MDs trained at the TCM with at least 400 h of experience Practitioners received training and were supervised by the director of the study | No | No | Yes, licensed acupuncturist | Yes, the study acupuncturists met the current membership criteria of the Norwegian Acupuncture Society (2,500 h) and had at least 3 years of experience | Yes, treatments were performed by experienced acupuncturists trained in TCM | No | No | Yes, licensed acupuncturist | No |
|
| ||||||||||||
| (6) Control or comparator interventions | (6a) Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research question | N/A, case report | Yes, control group were given diet and self-massage training, but no acupuncture | Yes, Sham group | Yes, Sham group | No | Yes, control group with no intervention | Yes, Sham group | Yes, Sham group | N/A, case report | Yes, comparison acupuncture treatment | N/A, case report |
| (6b) Precise description of the control or comparator | N/A, case report | Yes, TuiNa massage (30 min massage for the areas in which acupuncture points are present) and diet (food choice based on the energetic balance of the individual) | Yes, needles in different acupoints | Yes, Sham points were proximate to the treatment points site, but not considered active | No | Yes, no medical treatment, but free to use self-provided nonpharmaceutical interventions | Yes, needling at sites thought to have minimal effects on hot flashes. Six needles in each side, shallowly needled, no attempt to reach deqi | Yes, Streitberger placebo needles in 4-5 points | N/A, case report | Yes, general treatment: LV4, KI7, ShenMen sympathetic, kidney, liver, and lung points | N/A, case report | |
STRICTA: Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture; N/A: nonapplicable; data detailed in Table 1.
Simplified evaluation according to STRICTA criteria and reporting and omission rates.
| Hammes et al., 2014 [ | Baccetti et al., 2014 [ | Hachul et al., 2013 [ | Painovich et al., 2012 [ | Kung et al., 2011 [ | Borud et al., 2009 [ | Avis et al., 2008 [ | Huang et al., 2006 [ | Hu, 2005 [ | Cohen et al., 2003 [ | Bijak, 2009 [ | Reporting rate per subitem | Omission rate per subitem | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Acupuncture rationale | (1a) Style of acupuncture | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| (1b) Reasoning for treatment provided | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 90.9% | 9.1% | |
| (1c) Extent to which treatment was varied | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | N/A | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| (2) Detail of needling | (2a) Number of needle insertions per subject per session | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 72.7% | 27.3% |
| (2b) Names or location of points used | Yes | Partially | No | Yes | Yes | No | Partially | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 63.6% | 18.2% | |
| (2c) Depth of insertion | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | 18.2% | 81.8% | |
| (2d) Response sought | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | 36.4% | 63.6% | |
| (2e) Needle stimulation | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Partially | No | No | No | No | Yes | 36.4% | 54.5% | |
| (2f) Needle retention time | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | 45.5% | 45.5% | |
| (2g) Needle type | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | 45.5% | 54.5% | |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| (3) Treatment regimen | (3a) Number of treatment sessions | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 81.8% | 18.2% |
| (3b) Frequency and duration of treatment sessions | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| (4) Other components of treatment | (4a) Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | 27.3% | 72.7% |
| (4b) Setting and context of treatment, including instructions to practitioners, and information and explanations to patients | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | 45.5% | 54.5% | |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| (5) Practitioner background | (5a) Description of participating acupuncturists | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | 45.5% | 54.5% |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| (6) Control or comparator interventions | (6a) Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research question | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | N/A | 87.5% | 12.5% |
| (6b) Precise description of the control or comparator | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | N/A | 87.5% | 12.5% | |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Reporting rate per article | 71.4% | 76.5% | 47.1% | 76.5% | 47.1% | 64.7% | 82.4% | 58.8% | 42.9% | 58.8% | 57.1% | |||
| Average reporting rate among articles | 62.1% | |||||||||||||
| Omission rate per article | 28.6% | 17.6% | 52.9% | 23.5% | 52.9% | 29.4% | 11.8% | 41.2% | 57.1% | 35.3% | 42.9% | |||
| Average omission rate among articles | 35.8% | |||||||||||||
STRICTA: Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture; N/A: nonapplicable.