Literature DB >> 26366044

Path Following in the Exact Penalty Method of Convex Programming.

Hua Zhou1, Kenneth Lange2.   

Abstract

Classical penalty methods solve a sequence of unconstrained problems that put greater and greater stress on meeting the constraints. In the limit as the penalty constant tends to ∞, one recovers the constrained solution. In the exact penalty method, squared penalties are replaced by absolute value penalties, and the solution is recovered for a finite value of the penalty constant. In practice, the kinks in the penalty and the unknown magnitude of the penalty constant prevent wide application of the exact penalty method in nonlinear programming. In this article, we examine a strategy of path following consistent with the exact penalty method. Instead of performing optimization at a single penalty constant, we trace the solution as a continuous function of the penalty constant. Thus, path following starts at the unconstrained solution and follows the solution path as the penalty constant increases. In the process, the solution path hits, slides along, and exits from the various constraints. For quadratic programming, the solution path is piecewise linear and takes large jumps from constraint to constraint. For a general convex program, the solution path is piecewise smooth, and path following operates by numerically solving an ordinary differential equation segment by segment. Our diverse applications to a) projection onto a convex set, b) nonnegative least squares, c) quadratically constrained quadratic programming, d) geometric programming, and e) semidefinite programming illustrate the mechanics and potential of path following. The final detour to image denoising demonstrates the relevance of path following to regularized estimation in inverse problems. In regularized estimation, one follows the solution path as the penalty constant decreases from a large value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  constrained convex optimization; exact penalty; geometric programming; ordinary differential equation; programming; quadratic programming; quadratically constrained; regularization semidefinite

Year:  2015        PMID: 26366044      PMCID: PMC4565725          DOI: 10.1007/s10589-015-9732-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Optim Appl        ISSN: 0926-6003            Impact factor:   2.167


  7 in total

1.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization.

Authors:  D D Lee; H S Seung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  MM Algorithms for Geometric and Signomial Programming.

Authors:  Kenneth Lange; Hua Zhou
Journal:  Math Program       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.995

3.  Splitting Methods for Convex Clustering.

Authors:  Eric C Chi; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.302

4.  On the Bumpy Road to the Dominant Mode.

Authors:  Hua Zhou; Kenneth L Lange
Journal:  Scand Stat Theory Appl       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.396

5.  A Generic Path Algorithm for Regularized Statistical Estimation.

Authors:  Hua Zhou; Yichao Wu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  ConvexLAR: An Extension of Least Angle Regression.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Yichao Wu; Hua Zhou
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.302

7.  A Path Algorithm for Constrained Estimation.

Authors:  Hua Zhou; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.302

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  MM Algorithms for Geometric and Signomial Programming.

Authors:  Kenneth Lange; Hua Zhou
Journal:  Math Program       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.995

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.