| Literature DB >> 26366020 |
James Albers1, Brian Lowe1, Hester Lipscomb2, Stephen Hudock1, John Dement2, Bradley Evanoff3, Mark Fullen4, Matt Gillen1, Vicki Kaskutas3, James Nolan5, Dennis Patterson5, James Platner6, Lisa Pompeii7, Ashley Schoenfisch2.
Abstract
Use of a pneumatic nail gun with a sequential actuation trigger (SAT) significantly diminishes the risk for acute traumatic injury compared to use of a contact actuation trigger (CAT) nail gun. A theoretically-based increased risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders from use of a SAT nail gun, relative to CAT, appears unlikely and remains unproven. Based on current knowledge, the use of CAT nail guns cannot be justified as a safe alternative to SAT nail guns. This letter provides a perspective of ergonomists and occupational safety researchers recommending the use of the sequential actuation trigger for all nail gun tasks in the construction industry.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26366020 PMCID: PMC4562888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prof Saf ISSN: 0099-0027