Literature DB >> 26365660

The correlation between computed tomography and duplex evaluation of autogenous vein bypass grafts and their relationship to failure.

Jonathan Rehfuss1, Salvatore Scali2, Yong He1, Bradley Schmit1, Kenneth Desart1, Peter Nelson3, Scott Berceli1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Duplex ultrasound (DUS) imaging for vein bypass graft (VBG) surveillance is confounded by technical and physiologic factors that reduce the sensitivity for detecting impending graft failure. In contrast, three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (CTA) offers high-fidelity anatomic characterization of VBGs, but its utility in detecting at risk grafts is unknown. The current study analyzed the correlation between DUS and CTA for detection of vein graft stenosis and evaluated the relationship of the observed abnormalities to VBG failure.
METHODS: Consecutive lower extremity VBG patients underwent surveillance with concurrent DUS imaging and CTA at 1 week and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A standardized algorithm was used for CT reconstruction and extraction of the lumen geometries at 1-mm intervals. At each interval, CT-derived cross-sectional areas were coregistered and correlated to DUS peak systolic velocities (PSVs) within six predesignated anatomic zones and then analyzed for outcome association. Vein graft failure was defined as pathologic change within a given anatomic zone resulting in thrombosis, amputation, or reintervention within the 6-month period after the observed time point.
RESULTS: The study recruited 54 patients, and 10 (18%) experienced failure ≤18 months of implantation. The expected inverse relationship between cross-sectional area and PSV was only weakly correlated (Spearman rank coefficient = -0.19). Moderate elevations in the PSV ratio (PSVr; 2-3.5) were frequently transient, with 14 of 18 grafts (78%) demonstrating ratio reduction on subsequent imaging. A PSVr ≥3.5 was associated with a 67% failure rate. CT stenosis <50% was highly correlated with success (0 failures); however, high-grade (>80%) CT stenosis was more likely to succeed than to fail (25%). Significant discordance between CT and DUS was found in 18 patients. Although 14 of these patients had CT stenosis >70% with a PSVr <3.5, subsequent failure occurred in only two. Conversely, graft failure occurred in three of four patients with CT stenosis <70% but PSVr >3.5. Focused analysis of these patients using computational fluid dynamic modeling demonstrated that vein side branches, local tortuosity, regional diameter variations, and venovenostomies were the drivers of these discrepancies.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated that a PSVr ≥3.5 is strongly correlated with VBG failure, whereas the natural history of moderately elevated PSVr (2-3.5) is largely clinically benign. Although minimum stenosis on the CT scan was highly predictive of success, high-grade CT stenosis was infrequently associated with failure. The interaction of anatomic features with the local flow dynamics was identified as the primary confounder for a direct correlation between CT and DUS imaging.
Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26365660      PMCID: PMC4659752          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  31 in total

1.  Critical arterial stenosis.

Authors:  A G MAY; L VAN DE BERG; J A DEWEESE; C G ROB
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Timing of pedal bypass failure and its impact on the need for amputation.

Authors:  Christoph M Domenig; Allen D Hamdan; Thomas J Holzenbein; Nikhil Kansal; Bernadette Aulivola; John J Skillman; David R Campbell; Frank W LoGerfo; Frank B Pomposelli
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 3.  Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Maros Ferencik; Szilard Voros; Béla Merkely; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Finite element analysis in asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: in search of new rupture risk predictors.

Authors:  P Erhart; A Hyhlik-Dürr; P Geisbüsch; D Kotelis; M Müller-Eschner; T C Gasser; H von Tengg-Kobligk; D Böckler
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  Regions of high wall stress can predict the future location of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Barry J Doyle; Timothy M McGloughlin; Karol Miller; Janet T Powell; Paul E Norman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Factors associated with primary vein graft occlusion in a multicenter trial with mandated ultrasound surveillance.

Authors:  Lawrence Oresanya; Anil N Makam; Michael Belkin; Gregory L Moneta; Michael S Conte
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Michael M McNally; Salvatore T Scali; Robert J Feezor; Daniel Neal; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  A dynamical system that describes vein graft adaptation and failure.

Authors:  Marc Garbey; Scott A Berceli
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Finite element analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: predicted rupture risk correlates with aortic wall histology in individual patients.

Authors:  Philipp Erhart; Caspar Grond-Ginsbach; Maani Hakimi; Felix Lasitschka; Susanne Dihlmann; Dittmar Böckler; Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Flow reversal promotes intimal thickening in vein grafts.

Authors:  Yong He; Chessy M Fernandez; Zhihua Jiang; Ming Tao; Kerri A O'Malley; Scott A Berceli
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.