Literature DB >> 26365655

The effect of trainee involvement on perioperative outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Sebastian DiDato1, Alik Farber2, Denis Rybin3, Jeffrey A Kalish2, Mohammad H Eslami2, Carla C Moreira2, Nishant K Shah2, Jeffrey J Siracuse2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the effect of trainee involvement has been evaluated across different specialties, their effects on perioperative outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have not been examined. Our goal was to examine the association between resident and fellow intraoperative participation with perioperative outcomes of endovascular AAA repair (EVAR), open infrarenal AAA repair (OIAR), and open juxtarenal AAA repair (OJAR).
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set (2005-2012) was queried to identify all patients who underwent EVAR, OIAR, or OJAR. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the association of trainee involvement with perioperative morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS: We identified 16,977 patients: 12,003 with EVAR, 3655 with OIAR, and 1319 with OJAR. Propensity matching and multivariate analyses revealed that there was no significant difference in perioperative death, cardiac arrest/myocardial infarction, pulmonary, renal, venous thromboembolic, or wound complications, or return to the operating room. However, trainee involvement in AAA repair led to a significant increase in operative time for EVAR (163 ± 77 vs 140 ± 67 minutes; P < .001), OIAR (217 ± 91 vs 185 ± 76 minutes; P < .001), and OJAR (267 ± 115 vs 214 ± 106 minutes; P < .001) and an extended length of stay for EVAR (3.1 ± 5.3 vs 2.8 ± 4.5 days; P < .001) and OIAR (10.6 ± 11.8 vs 9.1 ± 8.9 days; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Trainee participation in aneurysm repair was not associated with major adverse perioperative outcomes. However, it was associated with an increased operative time and length of stay and therefore may lead to increased resource utilization and cost.
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26365655     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  4 in total

1.  The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.

Authors:  Donald K Groves; Maria S Altieri; Brianne Sullivan; Jie Yang; Mark A Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Characterizing endovascular aortic intervention outcomes for nonruptured aortic aneurysms by physician specialty.

Authors:  Andres Guerra; Joe M Feinglass; Matthew C Chia; Ashley K Vavra
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Patient selection and perioperative outcomes are similar between targeted and nontargeted hospitals (in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Peter A Soden; Sara L Zettervall; Klaas H J Ultee; Jeremy D Darling; John C McCallum; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  Artificial vascular models for endovascular training (3D printing).

Authors:  Inez Torres; Nelson De Luccia
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2018-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.