Literature DB >> 26365133

Factors affecting recall rate and false positive fraction in breast cancer screening with breast tomosynthesis - A statistical approach.

Aldana Rosso1, Kristina Lång2, Ingemar F Petersson3, Sophia Zackrisson2.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigate which factors affect the false positive fraction (FPF) for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) compared to digital mammography (DM) in a screening population by using classification and regression trees (C&RT) and binary marginal generalized linear models. The data was obtained from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, which aimed to compare the performance of DBT to DM in breast cancer screening. By using data from the first half of the study population (7500 women), a tree with the recall probability for different groups was calculated. The effect of age and breast density on the FPF was estimated using a binary marginal generalized linear model. Our results show that breast density and breast cancer were the main factors influencing recall. The FPF is mainly affected by breast density and increases with breast density for DBT and DM. In conclusion, the results obtained with C&RT are easy to interpret and similar to those obtained using binary marginal generalized linear models. The FPF is approximately 40% higher for DBT compared to DM for all breast density categories.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binary marginal generalized linear models; Breast cancer screening; Classification and regression trees; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Generalized estimating equations

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26365133     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  4 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence Detection of Missed Cancers at Digital Mammography That Were Detected at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Victor Dahlblom; Ingvar Andersson; Kristina Lång; Anders Tingberg; Sophia Zackrisson; Magnus Dustler
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-09-01

2.  Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.

Authors:  Daniel Förnvik; Hannie Förnvik; Andreas Fieselmann; Kristina Lång; Hanna Sartor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  False positives in breast cancer screening with one-view breast tomosynthesis: An analysis of findings leading to recall, work-up and biopsy rates in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.

Authors:  Kristina Lång; Matilda Nergården; Ingvar Andersson; Aldana Rosso; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Antibody-Guided In Vivo Imaging for Early Detection of Mammary Gland Tumors.

Authors:  Laura Jeffords Moore; Lopamudra Das Roy; Ru Zhou; Priyanka Grover; Shu-Ta Wu; Jennifer M Curry; Lloye M Dillon; Priya M Puri; Mahboubeh Yazdanifar; Rahul Puri; Pinku Mukherjee; Didier Dréau
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.243

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.