Literature DB >> 26364963

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients with calculous cholecystitis (with videos).

Tadahisa Inoue1, Fumihiro Okumura1, Kenta Kachi1, Shigeki Fukusada1, Hiroyasu Iwasaki1, Takanori Ozeki1, Yuta Suzuki1, Kaiki Anbe1, Hirotada Nishie1, Takashi Mizushima1, Hitoshi Sano1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recently, endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) has been performed to prevent recurrences in high-risk surgical patients with cholecystitis. However, evidence regarding the long-term outcomes of EGBS is sparse. We investigated the cholecystitis recurrence rate in high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis and compared the cholecystitis recurrence rates in patients in whom EGBS was performed with those in patients who were observed after percutaneous drainage.
METHODS: We studied 64 consecutive high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis who required gallbladder decompression between 2007 and 2014. We divided the patient cohort into patients who underwent observation after percutaneous drainage between 2007 and 2011 (OAPD group) and those who underwent EGBS between 2012 and 2014 (EGBS group), and we compared the groups.
RESULTS: The technical success rate of EGBS was 82.9% based on the intention-to-treat analysis. The cholecystitis recurrence rates were 17.2% in the OAPD group and 0% in the EGBS group, a difference that was significant (P = .043). There was also a significant difference between the groups with respect to the time to recurrent cholecystitis, which was determined by using Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = .015). The overall biliary event rates were 24.1% in the OAPD group and 9.1% in the EGBS group, and no significant difference was noted (P = .207).
CONCLUSION: EGBS reduced the recurrence of cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients with calculous cholecystitis. However, stent-related adverse events may occur, and modifications are necessary to reduce these.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26364963     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  10 in total

1.  EUS-guided versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Mahendran Jayaraj; Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar; Dhruv Singh; Joanna Law; Michael Larsen; Andrew Ross; Richard Kozarek; Shayan Irani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Zain A Sobani; Christina Ling; Tarun Rustagi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Subtotal Cholecystectomy Results in High Peri-operative Morbidity and Its Risk-Profile Should be Emphasised During Consent.

Authors:  James Lucocq; David Hamilton; John Scollay; Pradeep Patil
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for symptomatic gallbladder disease: a cumulative systematic review meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas R McCarty; Kelly E Hathorn; Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi; Kunal Jajoo; Marvin Ryou; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  EUS-guided gallbladder drainage vs. percutaneous gallbladder drainage.

Authors:  Aaron Justin Small; Shayan Irani
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 6.  Current Status in the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy: Is Endoscopic Drainage Feasible?- A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ryota Sagami; Kenji Hayasaka; Hidefumi Nishikiori; Hideaki Harada; Yuji Amano
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2020-01-09

7.  The evaluation of ENGBD versus PTGBD in high-risk acute cholecystitis: A single-center prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peilei Mu; Yanyan Lin; Xianzhuo Zhang; Yawen Lu; Man Yang; Zijian Da; Long Gao; Ningning Mi; Tianya Li; Ying Liu; Haiping Wang; Fang Wang; Joseph W Leung; Ping Yue; Wenbo Meng; Wence Zhou; Xun Li
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-12-23

8.  Permanent endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage using a novel spiral stent (IYO-stent).

Authors:  Yuichi Takano; Jun Noda; Masataka Yamawaki; Tetsushi Azami; Takahiro Kobayashi; Fumitaka Niiya; Naotaka Maruoka; Tatsuya Yamagami; Masatsugu Nagahama
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2021-09-02

9.  Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Chikara Iino; Tadashi Shimoyama; Takasato Igarashi; Tomoyuki Aihara; Kentaro Ishii; Juichi Sakamoto; Hiroshi Tono; Shinsaku Fukuda
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-05-08

Review 10.  Recent advances in management of acalculous cholecystitis.

Authors:  Bryan Balmadrid
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-10-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.