| Literature DB >> 26364273 |
Camilo de la Fuente-Sandoval1, Francisco Reyes-Madrigal2, Xiangling Mao2, Pablo León-Ortiz2, Oscar Rodríguez-Mayoral2, Rodolfo Solís-Vivanco2, Rafael Favila2, Ariel Graff-Guerrero2, Dikoma C Shungu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dysregulations of the major inhibitory and excitatory amino neurotransmitter systems of γ-aminobutyric acid and glutamate, respectively, have been described in patients with schizophrenia. However, it is unclear whether these abnormalities are present in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis.Entities:
Keywords: 1H MRS; GABA; glutamate; psychosis; schizophrenia; ultra-high risk
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26364273 PMCID: PMC4815472 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ISSN: 1461-1457 Impact factor: 5.176
Figure 1.(A) Sagittal (top) and axial localizer images showing the size and location of the medial prefrontal cortex voxel of interest. (B) Demonstration of in vivo human brain γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate+glutamine (Glx) detection by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) in the dorsal caudate: (a-b), single-voxel subspectra acquired in 13.4 minutes with the editing pulse on and off and 256 (512 total) interleaved averages; spectrum (c), difference between spectra (a) and (b) showing the edited brain GABA and Glx resonances; spectrum (d), model-fitting of the experimental spectrum (c) to obtain the GABA and Glx peak areas; spectrum (e), individual components of the fits; spectrum (f), residual of the difference between spectra (c) and (d). (C) Coronal (top) and axial localizer images showing dorsal caudate voxel size and location. NAA, N-acetyl-aspartate; tCho, total choline; tCr, total creatine. Comparable spectral quality and signal-to-noise ratios were also obtained for the MPFC voxel.
GABA
/W, Glx/W) using ANCOVA. Additional ANCOVA tests were performed when demographic or clinical variables differed between the groups. Posthoc analyses were performed using Tukey’s honest significant difference, with correction for multiple comparisons.Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Sample.
| Control Subjects | UHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (±SD) years | 21.4 (3.3) | 20.7 (4.1) |
| Gender (male/female) | 19/5 | 15/8 |
| Education (±SD) years | 14.5 (2.9) | 11.5 (2.7) |
| Parental education (±SD) years | 12.5 (4.2) | 12.6 (4.7) |
| Handedness (right/left) | 24/0 | 23/0 |
| Tobacco (ever used) | 4/24 | 5/23 |
| Cannabis (ever used) | 1/24 | 2/23 |
| Length of illness (±SD) weeks | 45.6 (34.9) | |
| SIPS | 12.0 (4.0) | |
| SIPS | 11.7 (7.0) | |
| SIPS | 8.2 (4.3) | |
| SIPS | 7.3 (3.8) |
* P < .05.
Means (±Sd) for Each Metabolite, Tissue Composition, and Spectral Quality in the Two Regions of Interest in Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis and Healthy Control Groups.
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MPFC | UHR | 2.12 (0.33) x 10–3
| 1.77 (0.25) x 10–3
| 1.80 (0.14) x 10–2 | 1.16 (0.13) x 10–2 | 1.29 (0.11) x 10–2 | 1.72 (0.19) x 10–12 | 0.202 (0.026) | 0.530 | 0.263 (0.043) | 12.02 (2.17) | 18.93 |
| Control | 1.91 (0.29) x 10–3 | 1.58 (0.20) x 10–3 | 1.84 (0.23) x 10–2 | 1.15 (0.13) x 10–2 | 1.26 (0.16) x 10–2 | 1.69 (0.19) x 10–12 | 0.211 (0.028) | 0.523 (0.032) | 0.261 (0.036) | 12.20 (2.30) | 19.82 | |
| Dorsal Caudate | UHR | 2.21 (0.36) x 10–3
| 1.49 (0.24) x 10–3
| 1.58 (0.23) x 10–2 | 1.10 (0.20) x 10–2 | 1.15 (0.18) x 10–2 | 1.77 (0.13) x 10–12 | 0.158 (0.058) | 0.356 (0.049) | 0.483 (0.079) | 8.53 (2.66) | 22.41 (5.02) |
| Control | 1.80 (0.27) x 10–3 | 1.28 (0.25) x 10–3 | 1.58 (0.26) x 10–2 | 1.04 (0.22) x 10–2 | 1.11 (0.20) x 10–2 | 1.82 (0.13) x 10–12 | 0.187 (0.067) | 0.354 (0.036) | 0.456 (0.049) | 7.84 (1.83) | 22.87 (2.92) | |
GM, grey matter; NAA, N-acetyl-aspartate; tCho, total choline; tCr, total creatine; WM, white matter; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; FWHM, full-width at half maximum; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio of the NAA peak.
* P < .05.
Figure 2.Levels of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate+glutamine (Glx) (A) in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and (B) in the dorsal caudate of ultra-high risk (UHR) and control subjects. The short horizontal bars represent the mean value for each group; * denotes significant differences at P<.05.
Figure 3.Scatterplots with linear regression fit for the associations between γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate+glutamine (Glx): (A) in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) within the ultra-high risk (UHR) group, and (B) in the dorsal caudate within the control group. The curves bracketing the data points represent the 95% confidence interval.
Figure 4.(A) Scatterplot with linear regression fit for the association between γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the dorsal caudate and glutamate+glutamine (Glx) in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) within the ultra-high risk (UHR) group.(B) Scatterplot with linear regression fit for the association between Glx in the caudate and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) positive subscores within the UHR group. The curves bracketing the data points represent the 95% confidence interval.