Literature DB >> 26364213

Analyzing the Publish-or-Perish Paradigm with Game Theory: The Prisoner's Dilemma and a Possible Escape.

T C Erren1, D M Shaw2, P Morfeld3,4.   

Abstract

The publish-or-perish paradigm is a prevailing facet of science. We apply game theory to show that, under rather weak assumptions, this publication scenario takes the form of a prisoner's dilemma, which constitutes a substantial obstacle to beneficial delayed publication of more complete results. One way of avoiding this obstacle while allowing researchers to establish priority of discoveries would be an updated "pli cacheté", a sealed envelope concept from the 1700s. We describe institutional rules that could additionally favour high-quality work and publications and provide examples of such policies that are already in place. Our analysis should be extended to other publication scenarios and the role of other stakeholders such as scientific journals or sponsors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Game theory; Pli cacheté; Priority; Prisoner’s dilemma; Publish-or perish; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26364213     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9701-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  9 in total

1.  Reward quality not quantity.

Authors:  Stan W Trimble
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Judging words rather than journals or authors: a reminder that peer review continues after publication.

Authors:  T C Erren
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2007-12

3.  On establishing priority of ideas: revisiting the "pli cacheté" (deposition of a sealed envelope).

Authors:  Thomas C Erren
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Publish or perish, but at what cost?

Authors:  Ushma S Neill
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  How to avoid haste and waste in occupational, environmental and public health research.

Authors:  T C Erren; D M Shaw; J V Groß
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Publish or perish: a proposal.

Authors:  M Angell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Assessing value in biomedical research: the PQRST of appraisal and reward.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Defrosting the digital library: bibliographic tools for the next generation web.

Authors:  Duncan Hull; Steve R Pettifer; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Beyond open big data: addressing unreliable research.

Authors:  Edward T Moseley; Douglas J Hsu; David J Stone; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Bibliometric analysis of authorship trends and collaboration dynamics over the past three decades of BONE's publication history.

Authors:  Faisal Khan; Morgan M Sandelski; Jeffrey D Rytlewski; Jennifer Lamb; Christina Pedro; Michael B N Adjei; Shatoria Lunsford; James P Fischer; Austin E Wininger; Elizabeth C Whipple; Randall T Loder; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Article-level assessment of influence and translation in biomedical research.

Authors:  George M Santangelo
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Comparative analysis of authorship trends in the Journal of Hand Surgery European and American volumes: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Alexander W Peters; Michael K Savaglio; Zachary J Gunderson; Gremah Adam; Anthony J Milto; Elizabeth C Whipple; Randall T Loder; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.