Literature DB >> 26364065

Integrating LIDAR and forest inventories to fill the trees outside forests data gap.

Kristofer D Johnson1, Richard Birdsey2, Jason Cole2, Anu Swatantran3, Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne4, Ralph Dubayah3, Andrew Lister2.   

Abstract

Forest inventories are commonly used to estimate total tree biomass of forest land even though they are not traditionally designed to measure biomass of trees outside forests (TOF). The consequence may be an inaccurate representation of all of the aboveground biomass, which propagates error to the outputs of spatial and process models that rely on the inventory data. An ideal approach to fill this data gap would be to integrate TOF measurements within a traditional forest inventory for a parsimonious estimate of total tree biomass. In this study, Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) data were used to predict biomass of TOF in all "nonforest" Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) plots in the state of Maryland. To validate the LIDAR-based biomass predictions, a field crew was sent to measure TOF on nonforest plots in three Maryland counties, revealing close agreement at both the plot and county scales between the two estimates. Total tree biomass in Maryland increased by 25.5 Tg, or 15.6%, when biomass of TOF were included. In two counties (Carroll and Howard), there was a 47% increase. In contrast, counties located further away from the interstate highway corridor showed only a modest increase in biomass when TOF were added because nonforest conditions were less common in those areas. The advantage of this approach for estimating biomass of TOF is that it is compatible with, and explicitly separates TOF biomass from, forest biomass already measured by FIA crews. By predicting biomass of TOF at actual FIA plots, this approach is directly compatible with traditionally reported FIA forest biomass, providing a framework for other states to follow, and should improve carbon reporting and modeling activities in Maryland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon management; Forest inventory; LIDAR; Nonforest biomass; Trees outside forest

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26364065     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4839-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Inventory methods for trees in nonforest areas in the Great Plains States.

Authors:  Andrew J Lister; Charles T Scott; Steven Rasmussen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA.

Authors:  David J Nowak; Daniel E Crane
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States.

Authors:  David J Nowak; Eric J Greenfield; Robert E Hoehn; Elizabeth Lapoint
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Local discrepancies in continental scale biomass maps: a case study over forested and non-forested landscapes in Maryland, USA.

Authors:  Wenli Huang; Anu Swatantran; Kristofer Johnson; Laura Duncanson; Hao Tang; Jarlath O'Neil Dunne; George Hurtt; Ralph Dubayah
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2015-08-16

5.  Integrating forest inventory and analysis data into a LIDAR-based carbon monitoring system.

Authors:  Kristofer D Johnson; Richard Birdsey; Andrew O Finley; Anu Swantaran; Ralph Dubayah; Craig Wayson; Rachel Riemann
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2014-05-08
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Local discrepancies in continental scale biomass maps: a case study over forested and non-forested landscapes in Maryland, USA.

Authors:  Wenli Huang; Anu Swatantran; Kristofer Johnson; Laura Duncanson; Hao Tang; Jarlath O'Neil Dunne; George Hurtt; Ralph Dubayah
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2015-08-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.