Literature DB >> 26363985

Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial.

Rajendra Badwe1, Rohini Hawaldar2, Nita Nair3, Rucha Kaushik3, Vani Parmar3, Shabina Siddique2, Ashwini Budrukkar4, Indraneel Mittra3, Sudeep Gupta5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of locoregional treatment in women with metastatic breast cancer at first presentation is unclear. Preclinical evidence suggests that such treatment might help the growth of metastatic disease, whereas many retrospective analyses in clinical cohorts have suggested a favourable effect of locoregional treatment in these patients. We aimed to compare the effect of locoregional treatment with no treatment on outcome in women with metastatic breast cancer at initial presentation.
METHODS: In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, we recruited previously untreated patients (≤65 years of age with an estimated remaining life expectancy of at least 1 year) presenting with de-novo metastatic breast cancer from Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive locoregional treatment directed at their primary breast tumour and axillary lymph nodes, or no locoregional treatment, by a computer-generated block randomisation sequence (block size of four). Randomisation was stratified by site of distant metastases, number of metastatic lesions, and hormone receptor status. Patients with resectable primary tumour in the breast that could be treated with endocrine therapy were randomly assigned upfront, whereas those with an unresectable primary tumour were planned for chemotherapy before randomisation. Of the patients who had chemotherapy before randomisation, we randomly assigned patients who had an objective tumour response after six to eight cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00193778.
FINDINGS: Between Feb 7, 2005, and Jan 18, 2013, of the 716 women presenting with de-novo metastatic breast cancer, we randomly assigned 350 patients: 173 to locoregional treatment and 177 to no locoregional treatment. At data cut-off of Nov 1, 2013, median follow-up was 23 months (IQR 12·2-38·7) with 235 deaths (locoregional treatment n=118, no locoregional treatment n=117). Median overall survival was 19·2 months (95% CI 15·98-22·46) in the locoregional treatment group and 20·5 months (16·96-23·98) in the no-locoregional treatment group (HR 1·04, 95% CI 0·81-1·34; p=0·79), and the corresponding 2-year overall survival was 41·9% (95% CI 33·9-49·7) in the locoregional treatment group and 43·0% (35·2-50·8) in the no locoregional treatment group. The only adverse event noted was wound infection related to surgery in one patient in the locoregional treatment group.
INTERPRETATION: There is no evidence to suggest that locoregional treatment of the primary tumour affects overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer at initial presentation who have responded to front-line chemotherapy, and this procedure should not be part of routine practice.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26363985     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00135-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  124 in total

1.  Effect of Surgery or Radiotherapy of the Breast on Survival in Metastatic Disease: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mahnaz Roayaei; Yalda Nikanpour; Hoda Mahdavi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-05

2.  Should aggressive thoracic therapy be performed in patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dianhe Li; Xiaoxia Zhu; Haofei Wang; Min Qiu; Na Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Is This a Curable Entity? A Contemporary Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Igor Makhlin; Kevin Fox
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  [Improved survival in patients with prostate cancer].

Authors:  René Baumann; Jürgen Dunst
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Survival of de novo stage IV breast cancer patients over three decades.

Authors:  Dieter Hölzel; Renate Eckel; Ingo Bauerfeind; Bernd Baier; Thomas Beck; Michael Braun; Johannes Ettl; Ulrich Hamann; Nadia Harbeck; Marion Kiechle; Sven Mahner; Christian Schindlbeck; Johann de Waal; Jutta Engel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Inflammatory Breast Cancer at the Extremes of Age.

Authors:  Taiwo Adesoye; Oluwatowo Babayemi; Lauren M Postlewait; Sarah M DeSnyder; Susie X Sun; Wendy A Woodward; Naoto T Ueno; Kelly K Hunt; Anthony Lucci; Mediget Teshome
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Treatment of the primary tumor in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ye Yuan; Amar U Kishan; Nicholas G Nickols
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Local Surgery Improves Survival in Patients with Primary Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Zhao; He-Fen Sun; Xue-Li Yang; Yang Zhao; Meng-Ting Chen; Wei Jin
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  The Impact of Primary Tumor Surgery on Survival in HER2 Positive Stage IV Breast Cancer Patients in the Current Era of Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Ross Mudgway; Carlos Chavez de Paz Villanueva; Ann C Lin; Maheswari Senthil; Carlos A Garberoglio; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Current Surgical Management of Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Taiwo Adesoye; Anthony Lucci
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.