Holly Pavliscsak1, Jeanette R Little2, Ronald K Poropatich3, Francis L McVeigh4, James Tong5, Johnie S Tillman6, Challis H Smith7, Stephanie Jo Fonda8. 1. mHealth Research Project Manager, The Geneva Foundation, Assigned to the Mobile Health Care Innovation Center (MHIC), Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC), United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC), Fort Gordon, GA 30905, holly.h.pavliscsak.ctr@mail.mil holly.h.pavliscsak.ctr@mail.mil. 2. Laboratory Lead, Mobile Health Innovation Center, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Fort Gordon, GA, USA, jeanette.r.little.civ@mail.mil. 3. Executive Director, Center for Military Medicine Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, rkp19@pitt.edu. 4. Chief Scientist, Advanced Technology and Innovation Laboratory, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Fort Detrick, MD, UA, francis.l.mcveigh.civ@mail.mil. 5. Engagement Manager, IMS Health, Government Solutions, Washington, DC, USA, jtong@us.imshealth.com. 6. Former, PI, COL (Ret) Army, currently Director of Integrated Disability Evaluation System, Fort Gordon, GA USA, johnie.s.tillman.civ@mail.mil. 7. Former, Principal Investigator, COL (Ret) Army, currently, Case Management Coordinator, Quality Management and Development, Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services, Richmond, VA, chc.smith@us.army.mil. 8. Principal Investigator and Senior Scientist, Geneva Research Foundation, Located at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Endocrinology Department, Bethesda, MD, USA, sfonda@genevausa.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article examines engagement with a mobile application ("mCare") for wounded Service Members rehabilitating in their communities. Many had behavioral health problems, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTS). The article also examines associations between Service Members' background characteristics and their engagement with mCare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analysis included participants who received mCare (n = 95) in a randomized controlled trial. mCare participants received status questionnaires daily for up to 36 weeks. Participant engagement encompasses exposure to mCare, percentage of questionnaires responded to, and response time. Participants were grouped by health status-that is, presence/absence of behavioral health problems, PTS, and/or TBI. Histograms and regression analyses examined engagement by participants' health status and background characteristics. RESULTS: Exposure to mCare did not differ by health status. Participants usually responded to ≥60% of the questionnaires weekly, generally in ≤10 h; however, participants with behavioral health problems had several weeks with <50% response and the longest response times. Total questionnaires responded to and response time did not differ statistically by health status. Older age and higher General Well-Being Schedule scores were associated with greater and faster response. DISCUSSION: The sustained response to the questionnaires suggests engagement. Overall level of response surpassed trends reported for American's usage of mobile applications. With a few exceptions, Service Members engaged with mCare irrespective of health status. CONCLUSION: Mobile health has the potential to increase the quantity and quality of patient-provider communications in a community-based, rehabilitation care setting, above that of standard care. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This article examines engagement with a mobile application ("mCare") for wounded Service Members rehabilitating in their communities. Many had behavioral health problems, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTS). The article also examines associations between Service Members' background characteristics and their engagement with mCare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analysis included participants who received mCare (n = 95) in a randomized controlled trial. mCare participants received status questionnaires daily for up to 36 weeks. Participant engagement encompasses exposure to mCare, percentage of questionnaires responded to, and response time. Participants were grouped by health status-that is, presence/absence of behavioral health problems, PTS, and/or TBI. Histograms and regression analyses examined engagement by participants' health status and background characteristics. RESULTS: Exposure to mCare did not differ by health status. Participants usually responded to ≥60% of the questionnaires weekly, generally in ≤10 h; however, participants with behavioral health problems had several weeks with <50% response and the longest response times. Total questionnaires responded to and response time did not differ statistically by health status. Older age and higher General Well-Being Schedule scores were associated with greater and faster response. DISCUSSION: The sustained response to the questionnaires suggests engagement. Overall level of response surpassed trends reported for American's usage of mobile applications. With a few exceptions, Service Members engaged with mCare irrespective of health status. CONCLUSION: Mobile health has the potential to increase the quantity and quality of patient-provider communications in a community-based, rehabilitation care setting, above that of standard care. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
Entities:
Keywords:
case management; mobile health; patient engagement; post-traumatic stress disorder; traumatic brain injury
Authors: Ronald Gimbel; Lu Shi; Joel E Williams; Cheryl J Dye; Liwei Chen; Paul Crawford; Eric A Shry; Sarah F Griffin; Karyn O Jones; Windsor W Sherrill; Khoa Truong; Jeanette R Little; Karen W Edwards; Marie Hing; Jennie B Moss Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-03-06
Authors: Shannon B Juengst; Lauren Terhorst; Andrew Nabasny; Tracey Wallace; Jennifer A Weaver; Candice L Osborne; Suzanne Perea Burns; Brittany Wright; Pey-Shan Wen; Chung-Lin Novelle Kew; John Morris Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 3.390