Samuel W Ross1, Blair A Wormer1, Mimi Kim1, Bindhu Oommen1, Joel F Bradley1, Amy E Lincourt1, Vedra A Augenstein1, B Todd Heniford2. 1. Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Hernia Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA. 2. Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Hernia Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA. Electronic address: Todd.Heniford@carolinashealthcare.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our goal was to set criteria for massive ventral hernia and to compare surgical outcomes and quality of life after ventral hernia repair (VHR). METHODS: The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for patients undergoing VHR from 2007 to 2013. Defect was categorized as massive if the width or length was greater than 15 cm or area greater than 150 cm(2). Massive VHR was compared to regular VHR. RESULTS: A total of 878 patients underwent VHR: 436 open, 442 laparoscopic with 13 deaths (1.5%) and 45 hernia recurrences (5.1%). Of those, 158 patients (18%) met criteria for massive VHR. Massive VHR patients had longer length of stay (LOS) and operative time and more hematomas, wound infections, wound complications, and pneumonias (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, LOS was longer, and early postoperative pain and activity limitation were greater in massive VHRs (P < .01). Massive VHR in the laparoscopic approach resulted in greater long-term mesh sensation (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: VHR in massive hernias have increased rates of complications and longer LOS.
BACKGROUND: Our goal was to set criteria for massive ventral hernia and to compare surgical outcomes and quality of life after ventral hernia repair (VHR). METHODS: The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for patients undergoing VHR from 2007 to 2013. Defect was categorized as massive if the width or length was greater than 15 cm or area greater than 150 cm(2). Massive VHR was compared to regular VHR. RESULTS: A total of 878 patients underwent VHR: 436 open, 442 laparoscopic with 13 deaths (1.5%) and 45 hernia recurrences (5.1%). Of those, 158 patients (18%) met criteria for massive VHR. Massive VHR patients had longer length of stay (LOS) and operative time and more hematomas, wound infections, wound complications, and pneumonias (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, LOS was longer, and early postoperative pain and activity limitation were greater in massive VHRs (P < .01). Massive VHR in the laparoscopic approach resulted in greater long-term mesh sensation (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: VHR in massive hernias have increased rates of complications and longer LOS.
Authors: S Dey; R Parthasarathi; S C Sabnis; R Jain; P Praveen Raj; P Senthilnathan; S Rajapandian; C Palanivelu Journal: Hernia Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Jacob E Mandel; DaeHee Kim; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Etay Ziv; Mary L Keohan; Sandra P D'Angelo; Mrinal M Gounder; Karissa Whiting; Li-Xuan Qin; Samuel Singer; Aimee M Crago; Joseph P Erinjeri Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Arthur R Celestin; Sivana Barron; Anthony Haddad; Emmeline Jia; Monica Morgenstern; Shawn Diamond; Blakely Plaster; Ryan P Cauley; Donald J Morris Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-02-09
Authors: Sharbel A Elhage; Matthew N Marturano; Eva B Deerenberg; Jenny M Shao; Tanushree Prasad; Paul D Colavita; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: T N Grove; L J Muirhead; S G Parker; D R L Brogden; S C Mills; C Kontovounisios; A C J Windsor; O J Warren Journal: Hernia Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 4.739