Literature DB >> 26362112

Quantitative genetic variance in experimental fly populations evolving with or without environmental heterogeneity.

Yuheng Huang1, John R Stinchcombe2, Aneil F Agrawal2.   

Abstract

Heterogeneous environments are typically expected to maintain more genetic variation in fitness within populations than homogeneous environments. However, the accuracy of this claim depends on the form of heterogeneity as well as the genetic basis of fitness traits and how similar the assay environment is to the environment of past selection. Here, we measure quantitative genetic (QG) variance for three traits important for fitness using replicated experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster evolving under four selective regimes: constant salt-enriched medium (Salt), constant cadmium-enriched medium (Cad), and two heterogeneous regimes that vary either temporally (Temp) or spatially (Spatial). As theory predicts, we found that Spatial populations tend to harbor more genetic variation than Temp populations or those maintained in a constant environment that is the same as the assay environment. Contrary to expectation, Salt populations tend to have more genetic variation than Cad populations in both assay environments. We discuss the patterns for QG variances across regimes in relation to previously reported data on genome-wide sequence diversity. For some traits, the QG patterns are similar to the diversity patterns of ecological selected SNPs, whereas the QG patterns for some other traits resembled that of neutral SNPs.
© 2015 The Author(s). Evolution © 2015 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditional neutrality; Drosophila melanogaster; environmental antagonism; maintenance of genetic variance; spatial and temporal heterogeneity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26362112     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Small population size and low genomic diversity have no effect on fitness in experimental translocations of a wild fish.

Authors:  M C Yates; E Bowles; D J Fraser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Rapid trait evolution drives increased speed and variance in experimental range expansions.

Authors:  Christopher Weiss-Lehman; Ruth A Hufbauer; Brett A Melbourne
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Rebecca J Fox; Iain Barber
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Experimental Evolution of Gene Expression and Plasticity in Alternative Selective Regimes.

Authors:  Yuheng Huang; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Genetic conflict with a parasitic nematode disrupts the legume-rhizobia mutualism.

Authors:  Corlett W Wood; Bonnie L Pilkington; Priya Vaidya; Caroline Biel; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-04-13

6.  Genotype-environment interaction and the maintenance of genetic variation: an empirical study of Lobelia inflata (Campanulaceae).

Authors:  Kristen Côté; Andrew M Simons
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.