Literature DB >> 26361719

High-throughput screening approaches and combinatorial development of biomaterials using microfluidics.

David Barata1, Clemens van Blitterswijk1, Pamela Habibovic2.   

Abstract

From the first microfluidic devices used for analysis of single metabolic by-products to highly complex multicompartmental co-culture organ-on-chip platforms, efforts of many multidisciplinary teams around the world have been invested in overcoming the limitations of conventional research methods in the biomedical field. Close spatial and temporal control over fluids and physical parameters, integration of sensors for direct read-out as well as the possibility to increase throughput of screening through parallelization, multiplexing and automation are some of the advantages of microfluidic over conventional, 2D tissue culture in vitro systems. Moreover, small volumes and relatively small cell numbers used in experimental set-ups involving microfluidics, can potentially decrease research cost. On the other hand, these small volumes and numbers of cells also mean that many of the conventional molecular biology or biochemistry assays cannot be directly applied to experiments that are performed in microfluidic platforms. Development of different types of assays and evidence that such assays are indeed a suitable alternative to conventional ones is a step that needs to be taken in order to have microfluidics-based platforms fully adopted in biomedical research. In this review, rather than providing a comprehensive overview of the literature on microfluidics, we aim to discuss developments in the field of microfluidics that can aid advancement of biomedical research, with emphasis on the field of biomaterials. Three important topics will be discussed, being: screening, in particular high-throughput and combinatorial screening; mimicking of natural microenvironment ranging from 3D hydrogel-based cellular niches to organ-on-chip devices; and production of biomaterials with closely controlled properties. While important technical aspects of various platforms will be discussed, the focus is mainly on their applications, including the state-of-the-art, future perspectives and challenges. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Microfluidics, being a technology characterized by the engineered manipulation of fluids at the submillimeter scale, offers some interesting tools that can advance biomedical research and development. Screening platforms based on microfluidic technologies that allow high-throughput and combinatorial screening may lead to breakthrough discoveries not only in basic research but also relevant to clinical application. This is further strengthened by the fact that reliability of such screens may improve, since microfluidic systems allow close mimicking of physiological conditions. Finally, microfluidic systems are also very promising as micro factories of a new generation of natural or synthetic biomaterials and constructs, with finely controlled properties.
Copyright © 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomaterials; Biomedical research; High-throughput screening; Microfluidics; Organ-on-chip

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26361719     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  15 in total

1.  Generating 2-dimensional concentration gradients of biomolecules using a simple microfluidic design.

Authors:  Amid Shakeri; Nick Sun; Maryam Badv; Tohid F Didar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  Bioprinting: From Tissue and Organ Development to in Vitro Models.

Authors:  Carlos Mota; Sandra Camarero-Espinosa; Matthew B Baker; Paul Wieringa; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Tissue-informed engineering strategies for modeling human pulmonary diseases.

Authors:  Kolene E Bailey; Michael L Floren; Tyler J D'Ovidio; Steven R Lammers; Kurt R Stenmark; Chelsea M Magin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.464

4.  3D material cytometry (3DMaC): a very high-replicate, high-throughput analytical method using microfabricated, shape-specific, cell-material niches.

Authors:  Kirsten Parratt; Jenny Jeong; Peng Qiu; Krishnendu Roy
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  A Plug-and-Play, Drug-on-Pillar Platform for Combination Drug Screening Implemented by Microfluidic Adaptive Printing.

Authors:  Jiannan Li; Wen Tan; Wenwu Xiao; Randy P Carney; Yongfan Men; Yuanpei Li; Gerald Quon; Yousif Ajena; Kit S Lam; Tingrui Pan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  High-throughput approaches for screening and analysis of cell behaviors.

Authors:  Jungmok Seo; Jung-Youn Shin; Jeroen Leijten; Oju Jeon; Gulden Camci-Unal; Anna D Dikina; Katelyn Brinegar; Amir M Ghaemmaghami; Eben Alsberg; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Analyzing the genetic characteristics of a tryptophan-overproducing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Dongqin Ding; Danyang Bai; Jinlong Li; Zhitao Mao; Yaru Zhu; Pi Liu; Jianping Lin; Hongwu Ma; Dawei Zhang
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Droplet Merging on a Lab-on-a-Chip Platform by Uniform Magnetic Fields.

Authors:  V B Varma; A Ray; Z M Wang; Z P Wang; R V Ramanujan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Bioprocess microfluidics: applying microfluidic devices for bioprocessing.

Authors:  Marco Pc Marques; Nicolas Szita
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Eng       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.163

10.  Development of a shear stress-free microfluidic gradient generator capable of quantitatively analyzing single-cell morphology.

Authors:  David Barata; Giulia Spennati; Cristina Correia; Nelson Ribeiro; Björn Harink; Clemens van Blitterswijk; Pamela Habibovic; Sabine van Rijt
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.838

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.