Literature DB >> 26361587

The Effects of the VFSS Timing After Nasogastric Tube Removal on Swallowing Function of the Patients With Dysphagia.

Du Hyeon Nam1, A Young Jung1, Ji Hwan Cheon1, Howard Kim1, Eun Young Kang1, Sung Hoon Lee1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) timing after the nasogastric tube (NGT) removal on swallowing function of the patients with dysphagia.
METHODS: This study was conducted on 40 NGT-fed patients with dysphagia. To assess the patients' swallowing function, VFSS was performed twice using a 5-mL 35% diluted barium solution. For the initial examination, VFSS was performed immediately after the NGT removal (VFSS 1). For the second examination, VFSS was performed five hours after the NGT removal (VFSS 2). We used the functional dysphagia scale (FDS) to assess swallowing function. In the FDS, a significant difference in the four items in the oral phase, seven items in the pharyngeal phase, and total scores were assessed (p<0.05). We also used modified penetration-aspiration scale (mPAS) to compare the two examinations (p<0.05).
RESULTS: A paired t-test was performed to confirm the statistical significance of the two examinations (p<0.05). The overall swallowing function was assessed as better in VFSS 2 than in VFSS 1. In the FDS, significant differences in the residue in valleculae (p=0.002), the residue in pyriform sinuses (p=0.001), the coating of pharyngeal wall after swallow (p=0.001), and the total scores (p<0.001) were found between the two examinations. Also, in the mPAS that assessed the degree of penetration-aspiration, a significant difference was found between the two examinations (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirmed that the timing of the VFSS after the NGT removal affects the swallowing function. Thus, to accurately assess the swallowing function, VFSS must be performed in NGT-fed patients after they have rested for a certain period following the removal of their NGT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deglutition; Dysphagia; Enteral Nutrition

Year:  2015        PMID: 26361587      PMCID: PMC4564698          DOI: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.4.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med        ISSN: 2234-0645


  9 in total

1.  Electromyographic activity from human laryngeal, pharyngeal, and submental muscles during swallowing.

Authors:  A L Perlman; P M Palmer; T M McCulloch; D J Vandaele
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-05

Review 2.  [Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders (dysphagia)--the American model as an opportunity for improving patient care and cost containment in Israel's healthcare system].

Authors:  H Eyal
Journal:  Harefuah       Date:  1997-06-01

3.  Timing of videofluoroscopic, manometric events, and bolus transit during the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing.

Authors:  I J Cook; W J Dodds; R O Dantas; M K Kern; B T Massey; R Shaker; W J Hogan
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  A penetration-aspiration scale.

Authors:  J C Rosenbek; J A Robbins; E B Roecker; J L Coyle; J L Wood
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  The effect of nasogastric tubes on swallowing function in persons with dysphagia following stroke.

Authors:  Tyng-Guey Wang; Meng-Chun Wu; Yeun-Chung Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsiao; I-Nan Lien
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances.

Authors:  Claudio Ar Gomes; Suzana A S Lustosa; Delcio Matos; Régis B Andriolo; Daniel R Waisberg; Jaques Waisberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

7.  Quantifying swallowing function after stroke: A functional dysphagia scale based on videofluoroscopic studies.

Authors:  T R Han; N J Paik; J W Park
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Malnutrition in stroke patients on the rehabilitation service and at follow-up: prevalence and predictors.

Authors:  H M Finestone; L S Greene-Finestone; E S Wilson; R W Teasell
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Complications and outcome after acute stroke. Does dysphagia matter?

Authors:  D G Smithard; P A O'Neill; C Parks; J Morris
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.914

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.