| Literature DB >> 26361538 |
Ali Rezaei-Golmisheh1, Hassan Malekinejad2, Siamak Asri-Rezaei3, Amir Abbas Farshid4, Peyman Akbari5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The current study was aimed to determine the bioactive constituents and biological effects of the Crataegus monogyna ethanolic extracts from bark, leaves and berries on hypercholesterolemia.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Bioactive compounds; Flavonoids; Hepatoprotective Triterpenoids
Year: 2015 PMID: 26361538 PMCID: PMC4556763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Figure 1Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activities (A) and total phenol content (B) of different concentrations of hawthorn extracts
Concentrations (mg/20 g) of oleanolic acid, ursolic acid, quercetin and lupeol in the dried extracts of hawthor
| Compound | Bark | Leaves | Berries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawthorn Powder (g) | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Dry Extract Yield (g) | 2.4 (12%) | 2.26 (11.3%) | 4.1 (20.5 %) |
| OA | 0.25 | 0.048 | 0.18 |
| UA | 0.218 | 0.122 | 0.56 |
| QCN | 3.07 | 2.39 | 0.92 |
| LPL | 13.7 | 3.09 | 0.87 |
Serum level of hepatic functional enzymes and the hepatic/total body weight ratio, n = 8 and mean values ± SD are given
| Groups | C | HC | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H/TBW | 0.030 ± 0.003 | 0.038 ± 0.001* | 0.033 ± 0.001# | 0.033 ± 0.002# | 0.031 ± 0.001# | 0.032 ± 0.003# |
| ALT (U/L) | 36.3 ± 2.7 | 55.3 ± 3.8* | 41.8 ± 1.7## | 47.0 ± 3.3# | 42.8 ± 3.1## | 40.9 ± 4.1## |
| AST (U/L) | 133.2 ± 5.5 | 193.1 ± 9.1* | 147.6 ± 4.0## | 161.9 ± 3.6# | 151.4 ± 8.9## | 143.9 ± 4.7## |
| GGT (U/L) | 15.6 ± 2.8 | 23.2 ± 2.0* | 19.2 ± 1.0# | 19.8 ± 0.8# | 18.0 ± 1.7## | 18.4 ± 1.1# |
Figure 2Effect of hawthorn extracts on: (A) hypercholesterolemia-elevated malondialdehyde content and (B) total thiol molecules concentration in the liver; bars represent mean ± SD; n = 8 in each group. Stars indicate significant differences (P<0.05) between the control and untreated hypercholesterolemic groups and #s indicate significant differences between untreated and treated groups
Effect of hawthorn ethanolic extracts and/or listat on lipid profile in experimentally-induced hypercholesterolemic rats
| C | HC | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| congestion | 0.0a | 28.8 ± 0.4b | 1.1 ± 0.3 C | 1.4 ± 0.5 c | 2.1 ± 0.3 c | 0.9 ± 0.6 d |
| vacoulation of hepatocytes | 0.0a | 28.8 ± 0.4b | 1.7 ± 0.5 C | 2.2 ± 0.4 c | 1.2 ± 0.4 c | 0.6 ± 0.4d |
| BDH | 0.0a | 2.7 ± 0.5b | 0.6 ± 0.4 C | 1.2 ± 0.4 c | 2.2 ± 0.4 c | 0.9 ± 0.6c |
| ICI | 0.0a | 28.4 ± 0.5b | 0.9 ± 0.3 C | 0.8 ± 0.4 c | 1.3 ± 0.4 c | 1.3 ± 0.4 c |
| Pyknosis | 0.0a | 28.9 ± 0.3b | 1.9 ± 0.6 C | 2.1 ± 0.6 c | 1.6 ± 0.5 c | 0.9 ± 0.6 d |
Figure 3Histopathological findings of rat livers from different treatment groups. (A and B): Control, (C and D): hypercholesterolemic group (HC), (E and F): T1, (G and H): T2, (I and J): T3, (K and L): T4. a: congestion, b: bile ducts hyperplasia, c: inflammatory cells infiltration, d: vacoulation and e: pyknotic nuclei. [H&E staining; (A, C, E, G, I and K ×100) and (B, D, F, H, J and L ×400)]
Effect of Hawthorn’s extracts on histological changes in the liver of hypercholesterolemic rats; mean values ± SD are given
| Groups | C | HC | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mg/dl) | 72.8 ± 2.7 | 100.1 ± 2.1* | 87.5 ± 2.1 # | 90.5 ± 2.3 # | 80.7 ± 3.1 ## | 75.2 ± 3.1 ## |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 50.1 ± 2.2 | 81.2 ± 6.2* | 68.5 ± 1.2# | 70.8 ± 2.4# | 60.7 ± 3.0## | 54.3 ± 3.7## |
| TG (mg/dl) | 35.2 ± 2.2 | 46.5 ± 2.4* | 42.8 ± 2.2 | 44.7 ± 1.3 | 41.1 ± 1.7# | 37.4 ± 1.7## |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 15.7 ± 2.6 | 9.5 ± 1.2* | 10.3 ± 1.3 | 10.6 ± 2.5 | 11.7 ± 1.8 | 13.4 ± 2.3# |