| Literature DB >> 26361476 |
A Naglot1, S Goswami1, I Rahman1, D D Shrimali1, Kamlesh K Yadav1, Vikas K Gupta1, Aprana Jyoti Rabha1, H K Gogoi1, Vijay Veer1.
Abstract
Indigenous strains of Trichoderma species isolated from rhizosphere soils of Tea gardens of Assam, north eastern state of India were assessed for in vitro antagonism against two important tea fungal pathogens namely Pestalotia theae and Fusarium solani. A potent antagonist against both tea pathogenic fungi, designated as SDRLIN1, was selected and identified as Trichoderma viride. The strain also showed substantial antifungal activity against five standard phytopathogenic fungi. Culture filtrate collected from stationary growth phase of the antagonist demonstrated a significantly higher degree of inhibitory activity against all the test fungi, demonstrating the presence of an optimal blend of extracellular antifungal metabolites. Moreover, quantitative enzyme assay of exponential and stationary culture filtrates revealed that the activity of cellulase, β-1,3-glucanase, pectinase, and amylase was highest in the exponential phase, whereas the activity of proteases and chitinase was noted highest in the stationary phase. Morphological changes such as hyphal swelling and distortion were also observed in the fungal pathogen grown on potato dextrose agar containing stationary phase culture filtrate. Moreover, the antifungal activity of the filtrate was significantly reduced but not entirely after heat or proteinase K treatment, demonstrating substantial role of certain unknown thermostable antifungal compound(s) in the inhibitory activity.Entities:
Keywords: Camellia sinensis; Trichoderma viride; cell free culture filtrate; extracellular antifungal metabolites; protease
Year: 2015 PMID: 26361476 PMCID: PMC4564153 DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2015.0004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Pathol J ISSN: 1598-2254 Impact factor: 1.795
Fig. 1In vitro antifungal activity of the potent Trichoderma antagonist SDRLIN1 against (A) P. theae and (B) F. solani on PDA plates.
Growth characters of Trichoderma viride strain SDRLIN1
| Characters | Description |
|---|---|
| Colony morphology | Dark green with cushion shaped structures |
| Microscopic features |
Conidia round, diameter 1.5 μm Chalmydospores, 7.3 × 6 μm Phialide, 7.1 × 1.3 μm Conidiophore branched, 10.5 × 1.2 μm |
| Growth rate (mm)/day | Colony matures approximately in 3 days; 26.66 mm / day |
Fig. 2Phylogram based on ITS rDNA region, showing the position of Hypocrea rufa (Trichoderma viride) strain SDRLIN1. The evolutionary history was inferred using Neighbour-Joining method and evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The analysis involved 22 nucleotide sequences.
Assessment of antagonistic activity of strain SDRLIN1against isolates of Pestalotia theae and Fusarium solani
| Isolates | Test fungi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| |||||
| Percent inhibition | Significance | Percent inhibition | Significance | |||
|
|
| |||||
| Dual culture assay | 50% v/v Cell free assay | Dual culture assay | 50% v/v Cell free assay | |||
| 1 | 52.6 | 55.5 | n.s. | 44 | 60.4 | |
| 2 | 54.4 | 48.8 | 32 | 50 | ||
| 3 | 60.5 | 70 | 50 | 40 | ||
| 4 | 55.4 | 60 | 57.6 | 58 | n.s. | |
| 5 | 70.4 | 60 | 60.6 | 42.2 | ||
| 6 | 59.9 | 57.1 | n.s | 49.6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 42.4 | 55.3 | 55.8 | 56.4 | n.s. | |
| 8 | 50 | 46.6 | 46.2 | 57.4 | ||
| 9 | 75 | 60 | 55.3 | 55 | n.s | |
| 10 | 69 | 48.8 | 36.4 | 69.6 | ||
| 11 | 59.6 | 60 | n.s. | 64 | 66.1 | n.s |
| 12 | 58.2 | 48.8 | 36.3 | 65.8 | ||
| 13 | 66.2 | 58 | 43.5 | 63.2 | ||
| 14 | 68.1 | 53.3 | 43.2 | 63.8 | ||
| 15 | 75.8 | 54 | 42.5 | 64.2 | ||
| 16 | 67 | 53.3 | 58.2 | 72.7 | ||
| 17 | 72 | 47.5 | 41.1 | 46.4 | ||
| 18 | 62.5 | 73.3 | 63.4 | 70 | ||
| 19 | 66 | 56.2 | 58.9 | 59.2 | n.s. | |
| 20 | 64 | 58.4 | 71.1 | 56.4 | ||
| 21 | 74.4 | 70 | 51.1 | 60.1 | ||
± Standard deviation,
Significant p<0.05,
Not Significant p≥0.05
Assessment of antagonistic activity of strain SDRLIN1 against phytopathogenic fungi
| Phytopathogenic fungi | Percent inhibition | Significant | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| (Dual culture assay) | (50% v/v cell free culture filtrate assay) | ||
| 65.7 | 18.7 | ||
| 56.0 | 69.0 | ||
| 55.1 | 53.1 | n.s. | |
| 54.7 | 68.7 | ||
| 51.1 | 22.2 | ||
± Standard deviation,
Significant p < 0.05,
Not significant p ≥ 0.05
Fig. 3In vitro antifungal activity of SDRLIN1 against (A) C. capsici MTCC 3414, (B) A. alternata MTCC 8459, (C) C. senegalensis MTCC 8463, (D) C. lindemuthianum MTCC 8474 and (E) C. gloeosporioides on PDA plates.
Fig. 4Antifungal activity of cell free culture filtrates of the antagonist SDRLIN1against P. theae isolate.
Fig. 5Effect of culture filtrates of strain SDRLIN1 on radial growth of P. theae.
Fig. 6Activity profile of hydrolytic enzymes secreted by the antagonist SDRLIN1.
Fig. 7Light microscope photography (40×) showing hyphal morphology of 3 days old culture of P. theae on PDA amended with 50% (v/v) culture filterate of Trichoderma strain SDRLIN1. The arrows indicate distortion of hypha.
Fig. 8Effects of proteinase K and heat on the antifungal activity of culture filtrates of Trichoderma strain SDRLIN1to phytopathogenic fungi.
Fig. 9Light microscope photograph (10×) (A) showing profuse growth of antagonist (SDRLIN1) and its interaction with the pathogen resulting in barrier formation (indicated by red arrows). (B) Showing scanty growth of pathogen and disintegration of its hyphae (indicated by blue arrows).