Jeong Mo Bae1, Jung Ho Kim1, Ye-Young Rhee1, Nam-Yun Cho1, Tae-You Kim1, Gyeong Hoon Kang1. 1. Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Ho Kim, Ye-Young Rhee, Nam-Yun Cho, Gyeong Hoon Kang, Laboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-799, South Korea.
Abstract
AIM: To validate the utility of Annexin A10 as a surrogate marker of the serrated neoplasia pathway in invasive colorectal cancers (CRCs). METHODS: A total of 1133 primary CRC patients who underwent surgical resection at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2007 were enrolled. Expression of Annexin A10 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray and paired to our findings on clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of each individual. CpG island methylator phenotype was determined by MethyLight assay and microsatellite instability was determined by high performance liquid chromatography. KRAS and BRAF mutation status was evaluated by direct sequencing and allele-specific PCR. Univariate and stage-specific survival analyses were performed to reveal the prognostic value of Annexin A10 expression. RESULTS: Annexin A10 expression was observed in 66 (5.8%) of the 1133 patients. Annexin A10 expression was more commonly found in females and was associated with proximal location, ulcerative gross type, advanced T category, N category and TNM stage. CRCs with Annexin A10 expression showed an absence of luminal necrosis, luminal serration and mucin production. CRCs with Annexin A10 expression were associated with CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation. In survival analysis, Annexin A10 expression was associated with poor overall survival and progression-free survival, especially in stage IV CRCs. CONCLUSION: Annexin A10 expression is associated with poor clinical behavior and can be used a supportive surrogate marker of the serrated neoplasia pathway in invasive CRCs.
AIM: To validate the utility of Annexin A10 as a surrogate marker of the serrated neoplasia pathway in invasive colorectal cancers (CRCs). METHODS: A total of 1133 primary CRCpatients who underwent surgical resection at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2007 were enrolled. Expression of Annexin A10 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray and paired to our findings on clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of each individual. CpG island methylator phenotype was determined by MethyLight assay and microsatellite instability was determined by high performance liquid chromatography. KRAS and BRAF mutation status was evaluated by direct sequencing and allele-specific PCR. Univariate and stage-specific survival analyses were performed to reveal the prognostic value of Annexin A10 expression. RESULTS:Annexin A10 expression was observed in 66 (5.8%) of the 1133 patients. Annexin A10 expression was more commonly found in females and was associated with proximal location, ulcerative gross type, advanced T category, N category and TNM stage. CRCs with Annexin A10 expression showed an absence of luminal necrosis, luminal serration and mucin production. CRCs with Annexin A10 expression were associated with CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation. In survival analysis, Annexin A10 expression was associated with poor overall survival and progression-free survival, especially in stage IV CRCs. CONCLUSION:Annexin A10 expression is associated with poor clinical behavior and can be used a supportive surrogate marker of the serrated neoplasia pathway in invasive CRCs.
Authors: Frank A Sinicrope; Thomas C Smyrk; David Tougeron; Stephen N Thibodeau; Shalini Singh; Andrea Muranyi; Kandavel Shanmugam; Thomas M Grogan; Steven R Alberts; Qian Shi Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Christopher W Toon; Michael D Walsh; Angela Chou; David Capper; Adele Clarkson; Loretta Sioson; Stephen Clarke; Scott Mead; Rhiannon J Walters; Mark Clendenning; Christophe Rosty; Joanne P Young; Aung Ko Win; John L Hopper; Ashley Crook; Andreas von Deimling; Mark A Jenkins; Daniel D Buchanan; Anthony J Gill Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Kenneth P Batts; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; John R Goldblum; José G Guillem; Charles J Kahi; Matthew F Kalady; Michael J O'Brien; Robert D Odze; Shuji Ogino; Susan Parry; Dale C Snover; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul E Wise; Joanne Young; James Church Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: David Hernandez Gonzalo; Keith K Lai; Bonnie Shadrach; John R Goldblum; Ana E Bennett; Erinn Downs-Kelly; Xiuli Liu; Walter Henricks; Deepa T Patil; Paula Carver; Jie Na; Banu Gopalan; Lisa Rybicki; Rish K Pai Journal: J Pathol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Lin Zhang; Juan Ye; Qiuyun Luo; Miaohuan Kuang; Minjie Mao; Shuqin Dai; Xueping Wang Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 3.989