Literature DB >> 26361088

In vitro evaluation of peri-implantitis treatment modalities on Saos-2osteoblasts.

Selena Toma1, Jerome Lasserre1, Michel C Brecx1, Catherine Nyssen-Behets2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mechanical treatment of the implant surface through surgical approach is recommended to control peri-implantitis. Few conclusive data exist about the physical and chemical properties of treated titanium surfaces and their biocompatibility towards osteoblasts. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate four clinical procedures: plastic curette, air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow(®) ), titanium brush (Ti-Brush(®) ) and implantoplasty in terms of biocompatibility and osteogenic effect when cultured with Saos2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Titanium disks were treated with plastic curette, air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow(®) ), titanium brush (Ti-Brush(®) ) and implantoplasty. Their surface microtopography (SEM), chemical composition (EDX) and wettability were evaluated. After seeding with Saos-2, cell morphology (1 h, 24 h), viability (three and 6 days) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and osteocalcin (OCN) production (7 days) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Control, plastic curette, Perio-Flow(®) and Ti-Brush(®) groups presented complex microstructures including craters and micropits, whereas the implantoplasty group appeared much smoother (SEM). Titanium, oxygen, aluminium and carbon were identified as the main components in all disks with a decrease in the percentage of oxygen, carbon and an increase in the percentage of titanium in the implantoplasty group (EDX). Implantoplasty disks were also significantly more hydrophilic than the other ones, whose surfaces appeared hydrophobic. Saos-2 showed no morphological difference at 1 h. At 24 h, they appeared round shaped in all groups, except the implantoplasty group where the cells appeared stretched and elongated. Viability was similar in all groups, but significantly higher in the Perio-Flow(®) than the control group at day six. ALP, OPG and OCN protein expression at 7 days was similar in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although implantoplasty was the only modality to modify the titanium surface morphology, composition and wettability, all treatment modalities promoted ALP, OPG and OCN production and appeared as valid approaches in terms of biocompatibility.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomaterials; bone implant interactions; periodontology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26361088     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  The influence of implantoplasty on the diameter, chemical surface composition, and biocompatibility of titanium implants.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Gordon John; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Improvement of Cr-Co-Mo Membrane Surface Used as Barrier for Bone Regeneration through UV Photofunctionalization: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Oscar Decco; Jésica Zuchuat; Nicolás Farkas
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Min-Joong Kim; Il-Hyung Kim; Na-Hee Chang; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  The Effect of Microcosm Biofilm Decontamination on Surface Topography, Chemistry, and Biocompatibility Dynamics of Implant Titanium Surfaces.

Authors:  Vanessa Sousa; Nikos Mardas; Dave Spratt; Iman A Hassan; Nick J Walters; Víctor Beltrán; Nikolaos Donos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments.

Authors:  Marco Lollobrigida; Lorenzo Fortunato; Giorgio Serafini; Giulia Mazzucchi; Giuseppina Bozzuto; Agnese Molinari; Emanuele Serra; Francesca Menchini; Iole Vozza; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.