Sandra H Sulzer1, Elizabeth Muenchow2, Annabelle Potvin2, Jessica Harris3, Grant Gigot1. 1. a Department of Family Medicine , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA . 2. b National Alliance on Mental Illness , Minneapolis , MN , USA , and. 3. c University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has historically been difficult to diagnose, and laden with stigma, leading to a variety of clinical responses to patients who present with symptoms. AIMS: (1) To understand how clinicians communicate the diagnosis of BPD with patients. (2) To compare these practices with patient communication preferences. (3) To use patient preferences to evaluate clinician practices. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with mental health care providers and experts (n = 32) were compared with patients (n = 10) and primary patient-written accounts (n = 22). Grounded theory was used to explore causal pathways between clinical practice and patient responses. RESULTS: The majority of clinicians sampled did not actively share the BPD diagnosis with their patients, even when they felt it was the most appropriate diagnosis. The majority of patients wanted to be told that they had the disorder, as well as have their providers discuss the stigma they would face. Patients who later discovered that their diagnosis had been withheld consistently left treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians believed that by not using the BPD label they were acknowledging or sidestepping the stigma of the condition. However, from the perspective of patients, open communication was essential for maintaining a therapeutic relationship.
BACKGROUND:Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has historically been difficult to diagnose, and laden with stigma, leading to a variety of clinical responses to patients who present with symptoms. AIMS: (1) To understand how clinicians communicate the diagnosis of BPD with patients. (2) To compare these practices with patient communication preferences. (3) To use patient preferences to evaluate clinician practices. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with mental health care providers and experts (n = 32) were compared with patients (n = 10) and primary patient-written accounts (n = 22). Grounded theory was used to explore causal pathways between clinical practice and patient responses. RESULTS: The majority of clinicians sampled did not actively share the BPD diagnosis with their patients, even when they felt it was the most appropriate diagnosis. The majority of patients wanted to be told that they had the disorder, as well as have their providers discuss the stigma they would face. Patients who later discovered that their diagnosis had been withheld consistently left treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians believed that by not using the BPD label they were acknowledging or sidestepping the stigma of the condition. However, from the perspective of patients, open communication was essential for maintaining a therapeutic relationship.
Authors: James Phillips; Allen Frances; Michael A Cerullo; John Chardavoyne; Hannah S Decker; Michael B First; Nassir Ghaemi; Gary Greenberg; Andrew C Hinderliter; Warren A Kinghorn; Steven G LoBello; Elliott B Martin; Aaron L Mishara; Joel Paris; Joseph M Pierre; Ronald W Pies; Harold A Pincus; Douglas Porter; Claire Pouncey; Michael A Schwartz; Thomas Szasz; Jerome C Wakefield; G Scott Waterman; Owen Whooley; Peter Zachar Journal: Philos Ethics Humanit Med Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 2.464
Authors: Marsha M Linehan; Katherine Anne Comtois; Angela M Murray; Milton Z Brown; Robert J Gallop; Heidi L Heard; Kathryn E Korslund; Darren A Tutek; Sarah K Reynolds; Noam Lindenboim Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-07
Authors: John G Gunderson; Robert L Stout; Thomas H McGlashan; M Tracie Shea; Leslie C Morey; Carlos M Grilo; Mary C Zanarini; Shirley Yen; John C Markowitz; Charles Sanislow; Emily Ansell; Anthony Pinto; Andrew E Skodol Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-04-04
Authors: James Phillips; Allen Frances; Michael A Cerullo; John Chardavoyne; Hannah S Decker; Michael B First; Nassir Ghaemi; Gary Greenberg; Andrew C Hinderliter; Warren A Kinghorn; Steven G LoBello; Elliott B Martin; Aaron L Mishara; Joel Paris; Joseph M Pierre; Ronald W Pies; Harold A Pincus; Douglas Porter; Claire Pouncey; Michael A Schwartz; Thomas Szasz; Jerome C Wakefield; G Scott Waterman; Owen Whooley; Peter Zachar Journal: Philos Ethics Humanit Med Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 2.464
Authors: James Phillips; Allen Frances; Michael A Cerullo; John Chardavoyne; Hannah S Decker; Michael B First; Nassir Ghaemi; Gary Greenberg; Andrew C Hinderliter; Warren A Kinghorn; Steven G LoBello; Elliott B Martin; Aaron L Mishara; Joel Paris; Joseph M Pierre; Ronald W Pies; Harold A Pincus; Douglas Porter; Claire Pouncey; Michael A Schwartz; Thomas Szasz; Jerome C Wakefield; G Scott Waterman; Owen Whooley; Peter Zachar Journal: Philos Ethics Humanit Med Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 2.464
Authors: Jordan Troup; Billie Lever Taylor; Luke Sheridan Rains; Eva Broeckelmann; Jessica Russell; Tamar Jeynes; Chris Cooper; Thomas Steare; Zainab Dedat; Shirley McNicholas; Sian Oram; Oliver Dale; Sonia Johnson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 3.752