Gareth Morris-Stiff1, Gabriele Marangoni2, Abdul Hakeem2, Shahid G Farida2, Dhanwant Gomez2, Giles J Toogood2, J Peter A Lodge2, K Raj Prasad3. 1. Departments of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK; Department of General Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, A100 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. 2. Departments of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. 3. Departments of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. Electronic address: raj.prasad@leedsth.nhs.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A major hepatic resection is currently defined as resection of 3 or more segments. The aim of this study was to analyse the post-operative morbidity and mortality of hepatic resections in relation to the number of segments excised. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2010, 1111 liver resections were performed for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database and analysed according to the extent of resection performed. RESULTS: 457 patients had 1-2, 362 had 3-4 and 292 had 5-6 segments resected respectively. In comparing 1-4 vs. 5-6 segments, overall morbidity (16.7% vs 40.7%; p < 0.001), hepatic failure (0.6% vs 10.6%; p < 0.001); mean hospital stay (8 vs 13.5 days; p = 0.000), mean ICU stay (4.4 vs 6.5 days; p = 0.01), 60-day mortality (0.7% vs 3.4%; p = 0.002), and 90-day mortality (0.7% vs 3.4%; p = 0.002) were significantly different. When analysing the 3-4 vs 5-6 segment resections, morbidity (21.8% vs 40.7%; p < 0.001), hepatic failure (1.4% vs 10.6%; p = 0.000), 60-day mortality (0.7% vs 3.4%; p = 0.002), and 90-days mortality (0.8% vs 3.4%; p = 0.023) remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in outcome would suggest a revision of the current classification. Only when 5 or more segments are excised for CRLM should a liver resection be considered "major".
INTRODUCTION: A major hepatic resection is currently defined as resection of 3 or more segments. The aim of this study was to analyse the post-operative morbidity and mortality of hepatic resections in relation to the number of segments excised. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2010, 1111 liver resections were performed for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database and analysed according to the extent of resection performed. RESULTS: 457 patients had 1-2, 362 had 3-4 and 292 had 5-6 segments resected respectively. In comparing 1-4 vs. 5-6 segments, overall morbidity (16.7% vs 40.7%; p < 0.001), hepatic failure (0.6% vs 10.6%; p < 0.001); mean hospital stay (8 vs 13.5 days; p = 0.000), mean ICU stay (4.4 vs 6.5 days; p = 0.01), 60-day mortality (0.7% vs 3.4%; p = 0.002), and 90-day mortality (0.7% vs 3.4%; p = 0.002) were significantly different. When analysing the 3-4 vs 5-6 segment resections, morbidity (21.8% vs 40.7%; p < 0.001), hepatic failure (1.4% vs 10.6%; p = 0.000), 60-day mortality (0.7% vs 3.4%; p = 0.002), and 90-days mortality (0.8% vs 3.4%; p = 0.023) remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in outcome would suggest a revision of the current classification. Only when 5 or more segments are excised for CRLM should a liver resection be considered "major".