| Literature DB >> 26360613 |
Clare T M Lai1, Sophia J Wong1, Janice J K Ip2, Wai-keung Wong3, Kwong-cheong Tsang3, Wendy W M Lam2, Yiu-fai Cheung1.
Abstract
Detectable low circulating level of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) may reflect subclinical myocardial injury. We tested the hypothesis that circulating levels of hs-cTnT are altered in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and associated with ventricular volume load and function. Eighty-eight TOF patients and 48 controls were studied. Plasma hs-cTnT levels were determined using a highly sensitive assay (hs-cTnT). The right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) were measured using 3D echocardiography and, in 52 patients, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The median (interquartile range) for male and female patients were 4.87 (3.83-6.62) ng/L and 3.11 (1.00-3.87) ng/L, respectively. Thirty percent of female but none of the male patients had increased hs-cTnT levels. Female patients with elevated hs-cTnT levels, compared to those without, had greater RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and LV systolic dyssynchrony index (all p < 0.05). For patient cohort only, hs-cTnT levels correlated positively with CMR-derived RV end-diastolic volume and negatively with echocardiography-derived LV and RV EF (all p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression identified sex and RV EF as significant correlates of log-transformed hs-cTnT levels. Increased hs-cTnT levels occur in 30% of female patients after TOF repair, and are associated with greater RV volumes and worse RV EF.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26360613 PMCID: PMC4566090 DOI: 10.1038/srep14050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Scatter plots showing plasma high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels in (A) male and (B) female patients after repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and control subjects. Solid lines represent the median, dotted lines represent the 99th percentile derived from non-parametric estimation.
Demographic, clinical, and cardiac parameters in patients and controls by gender.
| Male patients (I) (n = 44) | Female patients (II) (n = 44) | Male controls (III) (n = 26) | Female controls (IV) (n = 22) | p1 (I vs II) | p2 (I vs III) | p3 (II vs IV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic parameters | |||||||
| Age (years) | 23.6 ± 6.6 | 24.3 ± 6.3 | 23.3 ± 5.5 | 22.0 ± 3.7 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 0.12 |
| Weight (kg) | 56.1 ± 9.0 | 50.3 ± 9.9 | 69.0 ± 12.6 | 51.0 ± 6.2 | 0.005* | <0.001* | 0.79 |
| Height (m) | 1.7 ± 7.7 | 1.6 ± 7.0 | 1.8 ± 7.3 | 1.6 ± 6.5 | <0.001* | <0.001* | 0.017* |
| Clinical parameters | |||||||
| Need for medications | 0/44 | 4/44 | 0.009* | ||||
| Age at surgery (years) | 4.4 ± 4.5 | 4.4 ± 3.6 | 0.99 | ||||
| Duration after repair (years) | 19.3 ± 6.8 | 19.0 ± 6.0 | 0.82 | ||||
| Echocardiographic parameters | |||||||
| RV EDV (mL/m2) | 121 ± 45 | 118 ± 44 | 71 ± 15 | 59 ± 15 | 0.33 | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| RV ESV (mL/m2) | 61 ± 28 | 63 ± 22 | 30 ± 7 | 24 ± 6 | 0.41 | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| RV EF (%) | 51 ± 7 | 53 ± 6 | 57 ± 4 | 58 ± 4 | 0.20 | <0.001* | 0.007* |
| LV EDV (mL/m2) | 67 ± 16 | 63 ± 23 | 64 ± 10 | 55 ± 13 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.10 |
| LV ESV (mL/m2) | 32 ± 8 | 31 ± 12 | 28 ± 5 | 25 ± 7 | 0.69 | 0.01* | 0.022* |
| LV EF (%) | 52 ± 8 | 55 ± 7 | 57 ± 4 | 55 ± 4 | 0.15 | 0.001* | 0.63 |
| LV SDI (%) | 7.5 ± 3.8 | 7.4 ± 3.4 | 4.0 ± 0.9 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 0.91 | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| Cardiac magnetic resonance | (n = 21/44) | (n = 29/44) | |||||
| RV EDV (mL/m2) | 156 ± 52 | 140 ± 38 | 0.22 | ||||
| RV ESV (mL/m2) | 83.5 ± 33.4 | 74.0 ± 30.7 | 0.31 | ||||
| RV EF (%) | 49.4 ± 8.4 | 50.1 ± 8.0 | 0.75 | ||||
| PRF (%) | 32.4 ± 17.8 (n = 23/44) | 37.5 ± 15.1 (n = 28/44) | 0.65 | ||||
| LV EDV (mL/m2) | 76.1 ± 18.0 | 66.0 ± 14.0 | 0.03* | ||||
| LV ESV (mL/m2) | 32.4 ± 8.5 | 26.9 ± 9.8 | 0.04* | ||||
| LV EF (%) | 56.8 ± 9.7 | 60.3 ± 7.4 | 0.15 | ||||
Abbreviations: EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESV, end-systolic volume; LV, left ventricular; PRF, pulmonary regurgitant fraction; RV, right ventricular; SDI, systolic dyssynchrony index. *Statistically significant.
Comparisons of demographic, clinical, and cardiac parameters between female patients with plasma hs-cTnT levels above versus those with levels below the 99th percentile cutoff.
| ≤3.46 ng/L (n = 31) | >3.46 ng/L (n = 13) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic parameters | |||
| Age (years) | 24.4 ± 6.0 | 24.0 ± 7.3 | 0.83 |
| Weight (kg) | 51.4 ± 9.3 | 47.8 ± 11.2 | 0.27 |
| Height (m) | 1.6 ± 7.4 | 1.5 ± 6.0 | 0.49 |
| Clinical parameters | |||
| Need for medications | 3 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Age at surgery (years) | 4.75 ± 4.20 | 3.58 ± 1.29 | 0.37 |
| Duration after repair (years) | 19.7 ± 6.1 | 17.1 ± 5.8 | 0.22 |
| Echocardiographic parameters | |||
| RV EDV (mL/m2) | 109 ± 37 | 143 ± 51 | 0.035* |
| RV ESV (mL/m2) | 50 ± 18 | 71 ± 32 | 0.018* |
| RV EF (%) | 54 ± 5 | 51 ± 8 | 0.29 |
| LV EDV (mL/m2) | 62 ± 24 | 68 ± 18 | 0.49 |
| LV ESV (mL/m2) | 30 ± 13 | 33 ± 11 | 0.55 |
| LV EF (%) | 55 ± 6 | 52 ± 6 | 0.16 |
| LV SDI (%) | 6.7 ± 2.8 | 9.6 ± 4.1 | 0.018* |
| Cardiac magnetic resonance | |||
| (n = 29/44) | |||
| RV EDV (mL/m2) | 130 ± 28 | 163 ± 48 | 0.027* |
| RV ESV (mL/m2) | 64 ± 19 | 96 ± 41 | 0.008* |
| RV EF (%) | 52 ± 5.3 | 46 ± 11 | 0.14 |
| PRF (%) | 37 ± 18 | 38 ± 8 | 0.96 |
| (n = 28/44) | |||
| LV EDV (mL/m2) | 66 ± 13 | 66 ± 16 | 0.95 |
| LV ESV (mL/m2) | 26 ± 9 | 28 ± 12 | 0.74 |
| LV EF (%) | 61 ± 6 | 59 ± 9 | 0.65 |
Abbreviations as in Table 1. *Statistically significant.
Figure 2Scatter plots showing a negative correlation between log-transformed hs-cTnT levels and echocardiographically-derived right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) in male and female patients.