We studied cation exchange (CE) in core/shell Cu2-xSe/Cu2-xS nanorods with two cations, Ag(+) and Hg(2+), which are known to induce rapid exchange within metal chalcogenide nanocrystals (NCs) at room temperature. At the initial stage of the reaction, the guest ions diffused through the Cu2-xS shell and reached the Cu2-xSe core, replacing first Cu(+) ions within the latter region. These experiments prove that CE in copper chalcogenide NCs is facilitated by the high diffusivity of guest cations in the lattice, such that they can probe the whole host structure and identify the preferred regions where to initiate the exchange. For both guest ions, CE is thermodynamically driven as it aims for the formation of the chalcogen phase characterized by the lower solubility under the specific reaction conditions.
We studied cation exchange (CE) in core/shell Cu2-xSe/Cu2-xS nanorods with two cations, Ag(+) and Hg(2+), which are known to induce rapid exchange within metal chalcogenide nanocrystals (NCs) at room temperature. At the initial stage of the reaction, the guest ions diffused through the Cu2-xS shell and reached the Cu2-xSe core, replacing first Cu(+) ions within the latter region. These experiments prove that CE in copper chalcogenide NCs is facilitated by the high diffusivity of guest cations in the lattice, such that they can probe the whole host structure and identify the preferred regions where to initiate the exchange. For both guest ions, CE is thermodynamically driven as it aims for the formation of the chalcogen phase characterized by the lower solubility under the specific reaction conditions.
Colloidal inorganic nanocrystals
(NCs) are a testing ground for chemical and structural nanoscale transformations.
Cation exchange (CE), e.g., has been studied in ionic NCs also as
a means to implement current synthesis techniques.[1] An interesting aspect of CE applied to NCs is that its
intermediate steps often consist of multidomain heterostructures.
For example, partial CE performed on anisotropic NCs (i.e., nanorods,
nanoplatelets, nanowires) can lead to heterostructures evidencing
a replacement of cations only at the tips or in specific sections
of the NCs.[2] Similarly, isotropic NCs can
evolve into Janus-like or to core/shell structures when partially
exchanged.[3] Especially the Janus-like architectures
appear to indicate that there exist regions on the surface of NCs
acting as preferential entry points for cations, where the exchange
is initiated and from which it proceeds to the remaining volume of
the NC, so that both the interfacial energy and the elastic strain
between the two different phases are minimized.[2b] New insights into ion diffusion and CE reactions in NCs
came from recent works on CE in CdSe NCs[4] that demonstrated how Ag+ ions, once incorporated in
the NCs, could easily probe the whole NC lattice, via interstitial
diffusion. As soon as a critical concentration of Ag+ ions
was reached, their mutual repulsion caused their segregation closer
to the surface of the NCs, where the Ag+ ions could start
replacing Cd2+ ions. This was also proven in a recent work
by optically monitoring the same reaction with single NC resolution.[5] Therefore, while in CE reactions in NCs there
could be multiple entry points for ions (virtually the whole NC surface),
the actual exchange, initiated by ions that have already diffused
in the particles, can start from a region inside the NC that does
not necessarily coincide with the entry point(s). This should be especially
true when the guest ions are fast diffusing in the host lattice, so
that they can quickly probe the whole NC in the quest for regions
where it would be energetically more favorable for them to engage
in CE reactions. Ideal NC samples on which to probe these hypotheses
are represented by copper chalcogenide NCs, as the ones used in this
work, since they are characterized by a large density of Cu vacancies
that promote fast ion diffusion (through both interstitial and vacancy
sites),[6] facilitating CE with many different
guest cations. These NCs can be easily fabricated, e.g., from the
corresponding cadmium chalcogenide NCs (again by CE, see Supporting Information (SI) for details),[2b−2d,7] providing an ample set of samples,
in terms of sizes, shapes and architectures, to start with. It is
worth underlining that the Cu-chalcogenide NCs obtained through CE
from Cd-chalcogenide NCs are normally characterized by a slight copper
deficiency, due to the ease of formation of Cu vacancies, and as a
direct consequence, they exhibit a localized surface plasmon resonance
band (see Figure S1).[2h,7a] As test cations, we chose Ag+ and Hg2+, as
they have already been proven to induce CE in metal chalcogenides
at room temperature conditions.[2a,8] The different reactivities
of the two cations were taken into account when choosing the appropriate
feed ratios when performing CE reactions.When Cu+ cations in Cu2–S nanorods (NRs)
were partially replaced by Hg2+ ions, the NRs evolved into
multidomain structures, similar to what
was observed by other groups when exposing CdS NRs or Cu2S nanowires to Cu+ or Ag+ ions, respectively.[2e,6,7b] This is seen in the high-angle
annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy
(STEM) images of Figure a,c, and in the compositional maps acquired via energy dispersive
X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). In the Ag+ case, the NRs were
converted into a mixture of rods with a segmented structure and rods
with ternary composition (see Figure b and selected area electron diffraction analyses in Figure S2). In some of the partially exchanged
NRs, a slightly Ag-rich shell was also visible. The two cations, despite
having similar ionic radii (Ag+ = 1.0 Å and Hg2+ = 0.96 Å in tetrahedral coordination),[9] seemed to behave differently: the Ag+ ions appeared
to probe the entire NR volume, while the Hg2+ ions were
mainly engaged in reactions that started at the tips of the rods.
We then extended this reaction scheme to core/shell Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs.
A comparison of HAADF-STEM and EDS analyses of the initial sample
with those after partial exchange indicated a selective replacement
of Cu+ ions in the selenide core region (see Figures and S3, S4).
Figure 1
CE in Cu2–S NRs with Ag+ and Hg2+ ions. HAADF-STEM images of representative
groups of (a) pristine, (b) Ag+, and (c) Hg2+ partially exchanged Cu2–S NRs
with the corresponding STEM-EDS elemental maps. Scale bars are 20
nm.
Figure 2
CE in Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs with Ag+ and Hg2+ ions.
HAADF-STEM images of groups of (a) pristine, (b) Ag+, and
(c) Hg2+ partially exchanged Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs with the corresponding
STEM-EDS elemental maps. Scale bars are 20 nm.
CE in Cu2–S NRs with Ag+ and Hg2+ ions. HAADF-STEM images of representative
groups of (a) pristine, (b) Ag+, and (c) Hg2+ partially exchanged Cu2–S NRs
with the corresponding STEM-EDS elemental maps. Scale bars are 20
nm.CE in Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs with Ag+ and Hg2+ ions.
HAADF-STEM images of groups of (a) pristine, (b) Ag+, and
(c) Hg2+ partially exchanged Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs with the corresponding
STEM-EDS elemental maps. Scale bars are 20 nm.These findings were supported by elemental analyses (via
STEM-EDS),
which yielded a Hg/Se ratio of ∼1 and a Ag/Se ratio of ∼2
for the Hg-treated and Ag-treated NRs, respectively (Table S1). High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of partially
exchanged Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs, with both Ag+ and Hg2+ ions, reported in Figure S5, confirmed
the selective ion replacement in the core region and, importantly,
showed a continuous shell, exhibiting no cracks, surrounding the cores.
The exposure of Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs to a higher amount of Ag+ or Hg2+ ions led to an almost complete replacement
of Cu+ ions (see Figures S6, S7 and Table S1). The peculiarity of these results stands in the evidence
that cation replacement in the Cu2–Se core must be preceded, both for Ag+ and Hg2+ cations, by diffusion of cations through the Cu2–S shell. The structural transformations of the core/shell
Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs upon partial CE were monitored via X-ray diffraction
(XRD). The XRD patterns of the pristine Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs (Figure c) were dominated
by the hexagonal Cu2S (high chalcocite) peaks, with other
minor reflections ascribable to the metastable Cu2Se “chalcocite-like”
phase, as previously reported by us.[7a] The
XRD patterns of partially exchanged NRs, instead, evidenced in both
cases the presence of high chalcocite Cu2S, together with
a second majority phase that, in the case of Ag+-treated
NRs, could be indexed according to the orthorhombic Ag2Se (naummanite) phase (see Figure b), while for the Hg2+-treated rods, it
could not be indexed to any known bulk HgSe or to any alloyed HgSeS1– phase.
Figure 3
XRD patterns
of (c) pristine, (b) Ag+, and (a) Hg2+ partially
exchanged Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs, with bulk reflections
of hexagonal Cu2S (high chalcocite, ICDD 98-016-6578) and
orthorhombic Ag2Se (naumannite, ICDD 98-026-1822). Reflections
of the Cu2Se “chalcocite-like” phase are
adapted from ref (7a). The Bragg peaks emerging after Hg2+ partial exchange
correspond to the bulk reflections of hexagonal CdSe (cadmoselite,
ICDD 96-901-6057). In all samples, other minor peaks (labeled with
*) can be assigned to a substoichiometric tetragonal Cu116S64 phase (roxbyite, ICDD 96-901-5183), probably appearing
due to slight oxidation of the NC films exposed to air during pattern
acquisition.
XRD patterns
of (c) pristine, (b) Ag+, and (a) Hg2+ partially
exchanged Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs, with bulk reflections
of hexagonal Cu2S (high chalcocite, ICDD 98-016-6578) and
orthorhombic Ag2Se (naumannite, ICDD 98-026-1822). Reflections
of the Cu2Se “chalcocite-like” phase are
adapted from ref (7a). The Bragg peaks emerging after Hg2+ partial exchange
correspond to the bulk reflections of hexagonal CdSe (cadmoselite,
ICDD 96-901-6057). In all samples, other minor peaks (labeled with
*) can be assigned to a substoichiometric tetragonal Cu116S64 phase (roxbyite, ICDD 96-901-5183), probably appearing
due to slight oxidation of the NC films exposed to air during pattern
acquisition.By extending the search
to other known phases, these peaks could
be well matched with the hexagonal CdSe (cadmoselite) structure (Figure a). Since no traces
of Cd were detected by elemental analysis, the formation of a “cadmoselite-like”
hexagonal HgSe phase is likely due to the topotactic replacement of
Cu+ ions with Hg2+ ions in the core region,
with preservation of the hexagonal structure of the Se2– anion sublattice. Overall, XRD analyses corroborated the preservation
of the Cu2S shell and, at the same time, the selective
replacement of Cu+ ions in the core region with Ag+ or Hg2+ cations. By combining results from experiments
on Cu2–S and on core/shell Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs, we can state that the initial step in the CE reactions
is represented by the diffusion of the guest cations (Ag+ and Hg2+) in the NCs, most likely from multiple entry
locations. In the Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs, the guest ions, after having
diffused through the Cu2–S shell
and probed the whole NC volume, selectively replaced Cu+ host ions within the Cu2–Se
core. If one considers bond dissociation energies, CE involving Cu2–S or Cu2–Se NCs should not occur, since stronger Cu–S or Cu–Se
bonds are broken to form weaker M–S and M–Se (M = Ag,
Hg) bonds (Table ).
However, the overall energy balance includes also solvation energies
of the exchanging cations, which in most cases creates the actual
driving force.[1b] Since in these CE reactions
no phosphine was used, and methanol was the only Lewis base promoting
the exchange (see SI for details), the
thermodynamic feasibility of CE can be tentatively rationalized by
the trend in solubility product constants (KSP) of the materials involved[1e] (Table ). It is known that
a ionic solid with a relatively high KSP can spontaneously transform, through CE, to another ionic solid
with a lower KSP. As Ag2E and
HgE (E = S, Se) are less soluble in polar solvents than the corresponding
Cu2E solids, the former are thermodynamically favored.
Moreover, metal selenides are generally characterized by lower KSP than their corresponding sulfides.[10] Therefore, when both Cu2–Se and Cu2–S
domains are exposed to an amount of guest cations that enables competition
between the two, CE is more likely to occur in the metal selenide
domain.
Table 1
Bond Dissociation Energies (BDEs,
expressed in kJ/mol) (from ref (11)) and Solubility Product Constants (KSP, at 25°C) of Different Metal Chalcogenides (from refs (1e and 12))
E = S
E = Se
material
BDE
KSP
BDE
KSP
Ag2E
216.7 ± 14.6
6.3 × 10–50
210.0 ± 14.6
3 × 10–54
CdE
208.5 ± 20.9
1 × 10–28
127.6 ± 25.1
4 × 10–35
Cu2E
274.5 ± 14.6
2.5 × 10–48
255.2 ± 14.6
N.A.
HgE
217.3 ± 22.2
6 × 10–53
144.3 ± 30.1
4 × 10–59
Also, the Cu2–Se core, compared
to the Cu2–S shell, has a stronger
tendency to form Cu vacancies, as found by us in a previous work by
exposing the rods to oxidizing agents:[8c] this led to the formation of hollow particles by coalescence of
the Cu vacancies that had gathered in the Cu2–Se core. Here, it is possible that a larger density
of Cu vacancies in the core would additionally favor the diffusion
of guest cations in such region. Our experiments show that in “simple”
Cu2–S rods, which lack such preferred
region, the guest Hg2+ ions, after having likely probed
the whole rod, found the outer surface layers and/or the rod tips
as the most convenient regions to initiate exchange. For Ag+, this preference was less marked, since also particles with ternary
composition were found (see Figure b).[4b] These considerations
may help elucidating how CE can proceed in NCs in which ions have
high diffusivity: guest ions can diffuse in host NCs and target the
preferred region where to initiate CE rather than necessarily replace
original cations starting from the NCs surface, as commonly believed.
This argument is supported by additional tests employing Au3+ ions as guests in core/shell Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs. Here too, partially
exchanged samples evidenced a selective localization of Au ions in
the core (see Figure S8). This was corroborated
by STEM-EDS elemental analyses in which a Au/Se ratio of 0.7 was measured,
suggesting the formation of a Au1–Se phase in the core region (Table S1).These experiments were then benchmarked against CE on CdSe/CdS
nanoheterostructures. In cadmium chalcogenide structures, where the
density of vacancies is considerably lower than in Cu-based ones,
ion diffusion proceeds mostly interstially. When CdSe/CdS NRs were
partially exchanged with Ag+ ions, no preferential exchange
of the core was observed (see Figure S9). Instead, at the early stage of the CE process, Ag-containing domains
started “decorating” the CdS outer layer, accompanied
by the replacement of Cd2+ ions at the tips of the rods,
producing heterostructures similar to the Ag2S-CdS NRs
reported in the literature.[2a] Also, in
a previous work of ours, we studied CE involving CdSe/CdS octapod-shaped
NCs with Cu+ ions, in conditions that are similar to those
of this work;[2c] in that case too, the CE
started at the extremities of the CdS pods and left the CdSe core
unaltered. Furthermore, our data are in line with those of recent
works where it was shown that partial exchange of core/shell CdSe/CdS
nanoplatelets and NRs with Cu+ ions resulted in a selective
replacement of Cd2+ cations in the CdS shell.[13] In the light of the data discussed on Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs so far, these results suggest that, in CdSe/CdS NRs,
even if the thermodynamically preferred phases would be Cu2Se and Ag2Se (Table ), the limited diffusivities of both the entering Cu+ or Ag+ cations and the exiting Cd2+ ions are mainly responsible for the preferential nucleation of the
Cu2S or Ag2S phases at regions of the NCs close
to their surface. We also ran control experiments starting from “inverted”
core/shell Cu2–S/Cu2–Se NRs, prepared by complete Cu+ exchange
on CdS/CdSe NRs (see SI).[8c] When partial exchange with Ag+ or Hg2+ ions was carried out on them, the replacement affected selectively
the shell region (i.e., the Cu2–Se phase), as shown in Figure (see also Table S1). It is interesting
to notice that, in CE reactions involving Hg2+ ions, there
was a substantial anion interdiffusion throughout the NRs (Figure b). This further
proves that CE, affecting in this case mainly the shell region, represents
only the final step of a series of events in which Hg2+ ions had previously probed extended regions inside the rods, in
this case partially “dragging”, along their way, S2– and Se2– ions.
Figure 4
CE in “inverted”
core/shell Cu2–S/Cu2–Se NRs,
with Ag+ and Hg2+ ions. HAADF-STEM images of
representative “inverted” NRs partially exchanged with
(a) Ag+ or (b) Hg2+, along with the corresponding
STEM-EDS elemental maps. The scale bars in the images are 20 nm.
CE in “inverted”
core/shell Cu2–S/Cu2–Se NRs,
with Ag+ and Hg2+ ions. HAADF-STEM images of
representative “inverted” NRs partially exchanged with
(a) Ag+ or (b) Hg2+, along with the corresponding
STEM-EDS elemental maps. The scale bars in the images are 20 nm.In yet another control experiment,
a mixture of Cu2–S and Cu2–Se
NCs, prepared by standard direct synthesis protocols and not via CE
(see SI for details), was exposed either
to Ag+ or to Hg2+ ions. Here too, the experiments
were run with Ag/Cu or Hg/Cu feed ratios that were insufficient to
achieve a complete replacement of the copper ions, in order to trigger
competition between the two different types of NCs toward CE (see SI for experimental details). In analogy with
the experiments discussed above, CE selectively affected the Cu2–Se NCs rather than the Cu2–S ones (see Figure ). These experiments rule out any potential influence
of the preparatory history of the copper chalcogenide NCs (i.e., whether
they were synthesized directly or they were prepared instead by CE)
on their reactivity toward the guest cations.
Figure 5
CE in a mixed population
of Cu2–S and Cu2–Se NCs with Ag+ and Hg2+ ions.
HAADF-STEM images of groups of
copper sulfide and copper selenide NCs exposed to (a) Ag+ or (b) Hg2+ ions with the corresponding STEM-EDS elemental
maps. The scale bar in each image is 20 nm.
CE in a mixed population
of Cu2–S and Cu2–Se NCs with Ag+ and Hg2+ ions.
HAADF-STEM images of groups of
copper sulfide and copper selenide NCs exposed to (a) Ag+ or (b) Hg2+ ions with the corresponding STEM-EDS elemental
maps. The scale bar in each image is 20 nm.In conclusion, we have shown that in partial CE involving
core/shell
Cu2–Se/Cu2–S NRs exposed to Ag+, Hg2+,
and Au3+ ions, a selective replacement of the core cations
occurred. This selective CE is made possible by the high ion diffusivity
in copper chalcogenides, as it allows guest cations to probe the whole
structure and initiate the exchange in the core rather than in the
shell. The overall process, on the other hand, is driven by thermodynamic
factors which favor the formation of metal selenides over the corresponding
sulfides in our reaction environment. Our hypotheses were supported
by various control experiments. The ability to selectively transform
the core in core/shell copper chalcogenide NCs offers an additional
tool to tailor the topology and the chemical composition of colloidally
synthesized nanoparticles.
Authors: Richard D Robinson; Bryce Sadtler; Denis O Demchenko; Can K Erdonmez; Lin-Wang Wang; A Paul Alivisatos Journal: Science Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Bryce Sadtler; Denis O Demchenko; Haimei Zheng; Steven M Hughes; Maxwell G Merkle; Ulrich Dahmen; Lin-Wang Wang; A Paul Alivisatos Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Karol Miszta; Rosaria Brescia; Mirko Prato; Giovanni Bertoni; Sergio Marras; Yi Xie; Sandeep Ghosh; Mee Rahn Kim; Liberato Manna Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Kui Yu; Xiangyang Liu; Ting Qi; Huaqing Yang; Dennis M Whitfield; Queena Y Chen; Erik J C Huisman; Changwei Hu Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Renyong Tu; Yi Xie; Giovanni Bertoni; Aidin Lak; Roberto Gaspari; Arnaldo Rapallo; Andrea Cavalli; Luca De Trizio; Liberato Manna Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 15.419